• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In expanding the field of knowledge we but increase the horizon of ignorance.- Henry Miller. To what extent can a knower agree?

Extracts from this document...


"In expanding the field of knowledge we but increase the horizon of ignorance."- Henry Miller. To what extent can a knower agree? By approaching this quotation with a simplistic viewpoint the knower may feel more inclined to disagree with Miller's statement. They might ask themselves, "How can this be true? If we know something, we know it." However, when considering this quote from my perspective, I could not help but think they are wrong. It must therefore be questioned whether this idea of Miller's can be both true and false. Placing myself into the position of the knower I deliberated over this statement and concluded that, yes, it is valid. However, as I am a physics student I may be considered bias, as there may be a great likelihood that I am more inclined to apply this statement to the scientific areas of knowledge. Although this may be the case I found that throughout science we use reasoning and observations to conclude answers to our questions, often through experiments. Nevertheless, after these experiments have been completed we are often left facing many more questions than we had to start with. To use a personal example as a way to further explain this point, recently I participated in an experiment in physics where we used a jelly-like substance to model human's skin, and dropped ball bearings at different heights, in an attempt to recreate and compare gun shot wounds. ...read more.


Feynman appears to have realised that by modelling the results of our experiments to the results of other scientists we have stopped looking for answers to our questions but have rather started looking for questions to fit our answers. For example if a group of scientists had been funded by a particular company, such as Range Rover to find the effects of carbon emissions on the environment, we know that the results found by these scientists will prove some benefit for Range Rover, and will not be entirely truthful. The reasons for this being that Range Rover would have been depending on the scientists to find an answer that benefits their company. As a result of these bias findings we cannot progress our knowledge any further. It is because of this that I feel we have condemned ourselves to lives of ignorance. The halt to intellectual advancement is not solely the fault of the scientists; we are all to blame. The ignorance in our lives is only further perpetuated by the laissez-faire way in which we simply accept information without question. By not asking these questions and aspiring to increase our knowledge we can never hope to reach the equilibrium between understanding and ignorance. An example that may help to clarify this declaration that I am attempting to justify would be the paradigm shift of the Sun's pattern of orbit. ...read more.


Although this example verifies the first point that, by knowing the answer to the historical question, there is simply nothing left to know about this question, it also contradicts it. In considering this example we relies there is a reiterates of the point prior, the point that suggests, yes, in expanding our knowledge we increase our ignorance. The reason for this being that in order to be certain the knower is not ignorant the knower must be 100% certain their knowledge is correct. The historian who thinks that Archduke Franz Ferdinand has died peacefully in his sleep is wrong, and therefore by knowing the false answer he has still increased his horizon of ignorance. To conclude this argument I feel that the best answer to suggest to a knower is that, yes it is valid, but at the same time, it is not. The knower must think about the context to which they are applying this idea to before they can make a reasonable judgment. By first considering the context, whether it be science or history, or art even, they have progressed further in their ignorance, and if the knower is assured that the knowledge they have gained is 100% accurate they again have come even closer to understanding the extent to which increasing our knowledge increases the horizon of ignorance. It is only after both of these variables have been considered that the knower can truly reach equilibrium of knowledge to ignorance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    Whether or not an artist becomes famous or recognized throughout his lifetime does not matter. Many artists go unrecognized throughout their career, yet they still continue to make art which still goes up in galleries. Many pieces of art in the Gallery are by artists who are usually not known

  2. The knowledge that we value the most is the knowledge for which we can ...

    the laws of science and logic, that man would either trust his own senses completely or seriously ponder the possibility of a real floating carpet in front of him, but he would not reject his own senses immediately as weaker justifications compared to that of science.

  1. The Law of the Universe: Entropy

    emits an electric implus at an incredibly steady rate when a current is applied to it if this interaction were to take place faster, it would indicate a speedier progression of time. This suggests that time can be stopped by causing all interactions between particles to cease which happens when

  2. Seek simplicity and distrust it. (Alfred North Whitehead). Is this always a good advice ...

    He may finally conclude, that the implementation of appeasement policy was a mistake. He therefore uses reason to simplify complex thoughts and considerations and to develop a general hypothesis. Although speaking, again, about simplicity and the same conclusion, in this case it may be defined as profound simplicity, which reaches a conclusion after evaluating the complexity of the issue.

  1. The knowledge that we value the most is the knowledge for which we can ...

    This interest has caused me to gain a deeper knowledge in the field. It has caused me to investigate and gain more knowledge. This means there is more justification. Justifications for a piece of knowledge are the facts backing the piece of knowledge.

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    Historian's, like everyone else are affected by the time in which they live, with its specific society, ideas and attitudes. Whereas facts do not change over time, our interpretation of them do. We now have way better means of technology to discover and examine our finds, perhaps leading us to more specific results.

  1. A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    For example, the prediction of Osama Bin Laden being dead. Because of his liver problems, his walking using a cane and an immobilized arm, he was said to be dead.

  2. Knower's profile. My history and experiences are responsible for the knowledge-seeking-individual I am ...

    In order to understand and comprehend my desire for knowledge, one must know my history. I was born in Missouri, Columbia to Egyptian parents. Everyone has that one person they hold in high regards and look up to- people call them role models - I refer to them as 'Dad.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work