• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the development of mathematical and scientific knowledge, how problematic is the problem of induction?

Extracts from this document...


11.04.2012 Sofiya Koval In the development of mathematical and scientific knowledge, how problematic is the problem of induction? People always have been curious about the world and universe around. New theorems, laws and improvements to previous pieces of knowledge are found almost every day. We acquire new knowledge by using reason: wonder why the Earth is moving around the Sun and not vice versa, made hundreds and hundreds of scientists to devote their lives for observations and analyzing how both the planet and the star behave in the universe. Finding the ?reason?, therefore a cause, always has been the interest of mathematicians and scientists. There are 3 known forms of reasoning: informal reasoning, deductive and inductive. The most popular, widespread and, unfortunately, most unreliable form of reasoning in the development of knowledge in science and mathematics is induction. Induction implies going from particular to the general, for example if we know that aluminum can be expanded, iron can be expanded and nickel can be expanded and these three matters are metals, we can conclude that all the metals can be expanded. ...read more.


But there is always a chance, that tomorrow, this month or next year, someone will provide the evidence of its invalidity. Falsifiability can be considered both as a positive and a negative side of one coin. On the one hand, till knowledge is valid and useful for everything where it has been used and if it was based on good observations under high level control we can continue using it, but on the other hand, if knowledge is falsifiable and there is a chance of it being invalid in different conditions, is it possible that all our previous results obtained by this knowledge were actually invalid but only seemed for us as valid? Does it mean that all knowledge that we have can become invalid one day and that all efforts of mankind were all in vain? Uncertainty about whether the truth in science and mathematics exists or not makes us concern about understanding of the world around. ...read more.


for which theory didn?t work, but no one was able to formulate a general law, that will prove that this theorem is working for every number from range of infinity. For Andrew it took ages to prove and to find this general law. According to Karl Popper?s theory ?human knowledge in general, is irreducibly conjectural or hypothetical, and is generated by the creative imagination in order to solve problems that have arisen in specific historico-cultural settings? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper, 23.04.2012). The mentioned-above statement gives us an example of critical way of thinking: from this point of view, all pieces of knowledge, which are mostly achieved by induction reasoning, in sciences and mathematics have no sense. In conclusion I would like to point out that nevertheless without inductive reasoning most of the ?ocean? of knowledge we have about the universe around us and our behavior will not exist, we shouldn?t rely with no doubts on these knowledge and always do best to prove, make improvements to it and try to justify our conjectures to understand the world around more precisely. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Are scientific models useful, despite their inaccuracies?

    Through a teacher's perspective, a model is still very reliable as it still illustrates the basics which are needed to understand the more complicated elements of the theory. However through a scientist's point of view, like Muller's, a model is still close to inaccurate as it is far from the bigger picture.

  2. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    This pain includes such major scourges as poverty, oppression and persecution, war and all the injustice, indignity and inequalities that have occurred throughout history".2 The extent to which evil acts have caused human suffering is one of the most compelling reasons for atheism because as it is, it makes many

  1. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    Knowledge means understanding - seeing logical patterns and relations Knowledge is information organized in a meaningful whole E.g. a parrot "knows" information but it doesn't KNOW knowledge Second-hand knowledge Culture - knowledge shared between people Authority worship - blindly accepting what is given SH knowledge = Knowledge by authority =

  2. The Law of the Universe: Entropy

    The idea of entropy seems universal across all disciplines but it must be realised that there are various levels of purity in disciplines. For arguments sake, let us propose a classification. First there is logic, then there is mathmatics, then physics, chemisty, biology, psychology and finally sociology.

  1. Seeking the truth in the ocean of knowledge

    This opinion pool showed that 94% of American college teachers consider themselves as better that an average college teacher(2). Unfortunately this optimism is against the laws of statistics. No more than 50% are better, and no more than 50% are worse than average (in this meaning of the word ?average?),

  2. Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between ...

    logical answer, an example could be why abortion is immoral wrong ? D1: Describe the process to which a scientific question paper is subjected in order for it to be published, including the peer review process. Peer review is a process of self- regulation by a profession or a process of evaluation involving qualified individuals within the relevant field.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work