• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and human sciences?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐TOK Essay Title: In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and human sciences? Disagreement is the lack of consensus or general approval amongst two or more individuals or parties. It transpires when two or more individuals have contradicting or opposing opinions. Every Individual has personal opinions and, thus, disagreement is eventually inevitable. Although most see disagreement as a negative thing and a hindrance to furthering knowledge, disagreement may actually stimulate the pursuit of knowledge. Unless disagreement occurs, people will have blind faith in every knowledge claim without testing them. Knowledge is defined as a justified true belief; however, if people have blind faith in everything they hear knowledge will simply become a belief. In my essay I will use examples from the natural and human sciences to prove that eventually disagreement will lead individuals to pursue knowledge rather than cause a hindrance to their learning. Empedocles, a Greek pre-Socratic philosopher, came up with a theory of spontaneous generation whereby life, and thus cells, are spontaneously generated and do not require pre-existing life to generate. This theory was universally accepted because nobody disagreed with it until very recently, when the French chemist and microbiologist, Louis Pasteur, decided that life can?t simply generate out of nothing and, thus, he disagreed with Empedocles? theory. ...read more.


And it has to be substantiated empirically. Today we know that the core of the earth is made of molten lava, and that its liquid state makes the tectonic plates to shift or collide with one another, thereby causing earthquakes. And anyone who disagrees to this fact is shooting arrows in the thin air purposelessly. Disagreement will prevail on most issues until some answer that is empirically substantiated is proposed in its support. In the words of Locke ?we can achieve genuine knowledge only when we have clear ideas and can trace the connection between them enough to perceive their agreement or disagreement.? In the absence of anything concrete and substantial one has to resort to epistemological expectations. But do the conventional ways of knowing are decisive always? Are they not subject to disagreement given the fact that there are so many languages and that man?s perception, emotion and reason vary individually from one person to the other. In the area of knowledge human sciences, The great philosopher Nietzsche once said,? ?that reality is absurd and unknowable, and that it is language that imparts meaning to reality. ? but I disagree with Nietzsche and think that instead of giving meaning to reality it creates bias and prejudice, and that reality is not absurd. ...read more.


Just disagreeing with something will not always be fruitful as we live in a world of binary opposites. If there exist sciences we have pseudo sciences as well. Every science has its corresponding pseudoscience. For example: astronomy and astrology; medicine and homeopathy; psychology and parapsychology. Seeing is not always believing. We don?t see electricity, microwaves and infrared yet we believe in them, and cannot disagree with their existence. So is the case with the god. In this essay I have elaborated on the function of disagreement with the prevailing concepts and notions. And to deal with the question if disagreement can aid the pursuit of our knowledge I answer in the affirmative. Disagreement is essential whether it is Descartes (who suggested that we doubt everything) or I. It is the prerogative of every human being to judge the things for himself and look at the things from the point of view of a scientific enquirer. However, I must say that disagreement will not always serve to out interest for everything in this universe does not bring in its train empiric evidence. Disagreement is conducive to our knowledge but to a certain extent and it is necessary that it should come equipped with the other conventional ways of knowing, as it may not always amount to something substantial standing on its own. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    the sample population used in a test, the more accurate the predictions of the behavior of that sample, and smaller the expected deviation in comparisons of outcomes." (businessdictionary.com) Repeatability naturally comes into play and a broad range test subjects are used to support a proposed theory.

  2. TOK Essay on Natural Sciences

    The society also puts up moral values in the form of laws and social standards. For example, it is established as a social standard that murdering, raping, robbing are morally wrong since there are laws and punishments for the doing of those acts.

  1. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    then demonstrated for third parties, as an advance in understanding of the objective world. Such demonstrable knowledge would ordinarily confer demonstrable powers of prediction or technological construction. (Wikipedia) In Science,Paradigms are the main theories in a subject.It is noticed that dring `normal science` period most of the scientists wee trying

  2. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    The traditional form of paintings such done by Pedro Campos was emotionally and visually gave more of an impression to me as opposed to art pieces made from technology generated geometric shapes arranged together. Yet contrariwise, I could find Sean Augustine?s In Vanity light and reflective sculptures using unexplored territorial

  1. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    But, as a knower, can one?s sense of who one is be irreducibly boiled down to molecular variation? Since, Genes, are in fact, at the basic level just macromolecules of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and other elements, just like everything else around us, how is it that we are any different from anything around us?

  2. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    Although they are basically on two opposite sides of the class scale, they face very similar issues. While society had expectations set up for the characters to meet, they did not let these limitations stop them from achieving what they desired. Setting Both novels take place in 19th century England.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    It is possible for ideas to be improved by peer disagreements and criticism. These disagreements, instead of extinguishing the idea, they cause further motivation to obtain more evidence of accuracy. Challenged ideas allow for the conduction of new studies and increased developments.

  2. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

    The implications implied by the use of a metaphor to refer to a model is not merely subjective as it is employed by the majority of a community using a language. For instance, the use of an analogy that might not have been essential to the formulation of the model could potentially influence the development of the paradigm.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work