• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Alix Emden November, 2012 Period 1 Prescribed Title 1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences? The word ?disagreement? can mean a lot of different things; for example, it could refer to a slight difference of opinion politely stated, or it could describe a full blown, knock down fist fight, or even a war. Some kinds of disagreement are more productive than others. For example, the Indian political and spiritual leader Mahatma Gandhi said that ?honest disagreement is often a good sign of progress.? On the other hand, the author William Faulkner declared that, ?The last sound on the worthless earth will be two human beings trying to launch a homemade space-ship and already quarreling about where they are going next.? While I do believe that in some cases differences of opinion in the human and natural sciences can lead to further disagreements leading to fewer findings, the majority of the time this is not the case. The basis of disagreements tends can often be traced back to both perception and reason; when people's perception or reason do not match, this often leads to disagreements in everyday life as well as in the sciences. ...read more.


Natural science is the study of natural phenomena of the universe that we live in. This field includes chemistry, biology, physics, among other disciplines. Human science can be defined as the study of people themselves and their behaviors, including matter in subjects including history, anthropology, economics, etc. Because human sciences usually uncover trends rather than absolute facts, much is open for dispute. Human sciences thus provide a fertile breeding ground for disagreements since generally studies take the form of questionnaires and observation rather than incontrovertible numbers or equations which form the basis of natural science. A clear example of how disagreement can advance knowledge in the natural sciences can be found in Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, which is a continuation of Newton's Law of Gravity. Because Einstein questioned Newton's law ? i.e., disagreed with certain aspects of it - he conducted further research and produced a theory that today gives us a better understanding of the universe and interactions of objects even in strong gravitational fields. Einstein's theory starts with Newton's law and makes it applicable in a more sophisticated and complex realm of gravitational fields. ...read more.


There is no amount of scientific evidence that will change their opinion. Similarly, those who accept the theory of evolution are not persuaded by religious doctrine. About the only thing the two sides agree upon is that there must be some theory for how humans came to be on Earth ? beyond that, there is little room for productive disagreement. Indeed, there are two very different kinds of knowledge that are at stake ? one is scientific and one is religious. Disagreements within the two camps might advance knowledge in each, but disagreements between the two aren?t likely to persuade anyone to switch sides. Climate change is an area in between where is there is not only disagreement based on rational science but also disagreement based on other, less quantifiable and provable areas as well. Disagreements as to the cause or extent of human actions in causing climate change may well serve to advance knowledge, but those who flatly deny that climate change is happening at all base their position on emotion rather than reason. As in the case of creationism vs. evolution, disagreement between those two camps is unlikely to advance knowledge overall. When the basis of argument is so fundamentally different ? i.e., emotion rather than reason and evidence ? the prospect of productive disagreement diminishes sharply. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes ...

    These claims are certainly not based on 'good science' that is controlled and fair but rather on 'bad science' that ignores all tests that don't prove it to select the data that proves it. Geocentric astronomy for example, is very convincing because, if you stand on the ground and look

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    The law of large numbers enables us to predict group rather than individual behavior. This is an important point because the average behavior of a group is more predictable than that of an individual, which is subjected to distinctive differences and biasness.

  1. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    Progress is defined by the development in adjusting an explanation to the physical world?s mechanisms and processes. Despite the objective approach, natural sciences may need to use creativity in order to expand their imagination on possible models to explain scientific phenomena.

  2. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

    From this assumption, a theory can be put forward, the one of Kinetic Theory of Gases that involves equations interrelating the velocity (p), mass (m), momentum and energy of the hypothetical spheres. None of these theoretical properties can be physically observed.

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    While they both wanted different things, they both dealt with societies pressures. The major struggle for characters in Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre are their positions in society. Both Heathcliff and Jane are placed in houses were a higher class family lives.

  2. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    The last theory, which further challenges both previous theories, the Lewis Theory, which again does not exclude the previous two theories, but just further challenges and re-evaluate the theories.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    Keynesian economics was presented in an extensive economic theory in the 1930s. His belief was that a prosperous economy could be created by a combination of the private sector (investors unrelated to the government) and the aid of the government, through monetary and fiscal policies.

  2. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    Is how we behave under pressure really a part of who we are at the core? On the other hand, there are those who would claim that one is what one behaves i.e. one?s actions are what gives on a sense of who one is.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work