• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Alix Emden November, 2012 Period 1 Prescribed Title 1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences? The word ?disagreement? can mean a lot of different things; for example, it could refer to a slight difference of opinion politely stated, or it could describe a full blown, knock down fist fight, or even a war. Some kinds of disagreement are more productive than others. For example, the Indian political and spiritual leader Mahatma Gandhi said that ?honest disagreement is often a good sign of progress.? On the other hand, the author William Faulkner declared that, ?The last sound on the worthless earth will be two human beings trying to launch a homemade space-ship and already quarreling about where they are going next.? While I do believe that in some cases differences of opinion in the human and natural sciences can lead to further disagreements leading to fewer findings, the majority of the time this is not the case. The basis of disagreements tends can often be traced back to both perception and reason; when people's perception or reason do not match, this often leads to disagreements in everyday life as well as in the sciences. ...read more.

Middle

Natural science is the study of natural phenomena of the universe that we live in. This field includes chemistry, biology, physics, among other disciplines. Human science can be defined as the study of people themselves and their behaviors, including matter in subjects including history, anthropology, economics, etc. Because human sciences usually uncover trends rather than absolute facts, much is open for dispute. Human sciences thus provide a fertile breeding ground for disagreements since generally studies take the form of questionnaires and observation rather than incontrovertible numbers or equations which form the basis of natural science. A clear example of how disagreement can advance knowledge in the natural sciences can be found in Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, which is a continuation of Newton's Law of Gravity. Because Einstein questioned Newton's law ? i.e., disagreed with certain aspects of it - he conducted further research and produced a theory that today gives us a better understanding of the universe and interactions of objects even in strong gravitational fields. Einstein's theory starts with Newton's law and makes it applicable in a more sophisticated and complex realm of gravitational fields. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is no amount of scientific evidence that will change their opinion. Similarly, those who accept the theory of evolution are not persuaded by religious doctrine. About the only thing the two sides agree upon is that there must be some theory for how humans came to be on Earth ? beyond that, there is little room for productive disagreement. Indeed, there are two very different kinds of knowledge that are at stake ? one is scientific and one is religious. Disagreements within the two camps might advance knowledge in each, but disagreements between the two aren?t likely to persuade anyone to switch sides. Climate change is an area in between where is there is not only disagreement based on rational science but also disagreement based on other, less quantifiable and provable areas as well. Disagreements as to the cause or extent of human actions in causing climate change may well serve to advance knowledge, but those who flatly deny that climate change is happening at all base their position on emotion rather than reason. As in the case of creationism vs. evolution, disagreement between those two camps is unlikely to advance knowledge overall. When the basis of argument is so fundamentally different ? i.e., emotion rather than reason and evidence ? the prospect of productive disagreement diminishes sharply. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    The law of large numbers enables us to predict group rather than individual behavior. This is an important point because the average behavior of a group is more predictable than that of an individual, which is subjected to distinctive differences and biasness.

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes ...

    These claims are certainly not based on 'good science' that is controlled and fair but rather on 'bad science' that ignores all tests that don't prove it to select the data that proves it. Geocentric astronomy for example, is very convincing because, if you stand on the ground and look

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    Absolute ideas in science are non-existent, everything has the possibility to be questioned. Hypotheses develop into theories, theories become laws, and even laws may be questioned. Scientists use reason to seek the true answers of any question. In conjunction with the differing types of disagreements, the value of contentions in

  2. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

    From this assumption, a theory can be put forward, the one of Kinetic Theory of Gases that involves equations interrelating the velocity (p), mass (m), momentum and energy of the hypothetical spheres. None of these theoretical properties can be physically observed.

  1. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    There seem to be many such layers, each one derived from the unique desires, past experiences, knowledge concepts from various areas of knowledge employing different ways of knowing and so on. In that sense, the ?I? seems to be the sum total of all these mannerisms, cultural traits, experiences, and knowledge concepts learnt so far.

  2. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    Progress is defined by the development in adjusting an explanation to the physical world?s mechanisms and processes. Despite the objective approach, natural sciences may need to use creativity in order to expand their imagination on possible models to explain scientific phenomena.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and ...

    Although this shows that disagreement aids the pursuit of knowledge but many of these pursuits will be pointless ones. When a scientist produces a generally acceptable theory, such as ?Cells are the smallest unit of life?, it will be more likely for it to be true than for it to be false.

  2. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    These include policies that actively control money supply and interest rates as the economy changes, in an effort to keep employment high. (Giants of Finance: John Maynard Keynes.) By contrast, the free-market economists advocate that the government take a "hands off" policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work