• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A model is a simplified representation of some aspect of the world. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge? A model is a representation of a complex structure or concept that is used to explain it and represent it in a more simplistic manner with the aim of facilitating the understanding of it. Models are used in a variety of subjects such as natural sciences, government structures, history and many more. Although they are simplified simulations, they provide a representation of reality that help our learning and understanding of the phenomena that occur. However, models have the possibility of leading us into an error or incorrect information and thus present limitations that have the potential of hindering the knowledge. Models can be broken down into four main categories. Experimental models which can be constructed and put to use in a laboratory. A ?scale models would fit under this category, representing spatial relationships, and ?working models? representing temporal sequences. At the other end of the spectrum are logical models. These start from the axioms and theorems of a formal deductive system, they are used to illustrate abstract systems and provide a possible interpretation of it. Lastly, there are theoretical models. ...read more.

Middle

Generally speaking, dotted arrows should be added coming in from other familiar situations, on the left. When imagining a model, there are explicit or implicit references to what is similar and previously intelligible, furthermore there is freedom allowing to interpret a phenomena in the desired model. It can be assigned to any property that are thought of as fruitful contributors to the theory. This depends on the perception of the scientist of the phenomena in question. Therefore, since theoretical models are based on a scientists interpretation of what they perceive and the analogy that is made to an already known model, models do not provide a fully reliable and accurate representation of reality. Theoretical models can further be perceived as subjective and self determined, thus the numerous debates and disagreements amongst scientists concerning more complex models. Theoretical models convey associations and implications that aren?t specifically determined and that may be transferred if a shit in paradigm occurs due to the application of a different analogy to the phenomena. Additional developments and modifications may be proposed. ?A metaphor proposes analogies between the familiar context of a word and a new context into which it is introduced ?. Models can be compared to metaphors due their similar property of open-endedness. ...read more.

Conclusion

Metaphors help illustrate a model by drawing a direct comparison between the phenomena that is desired to be represented with an analogy that is already existent in our world, defined, explained and understood. The ?double-helix? model of the DNA molecules in biology is also considered as a theoretical model, but that one specifically is closer to observational evidence that can be collected in a lab and can therefore be literally taken. Nevertheless, even in this theoretical model, only a defined number of aspects that compose world are brought into prominence, while a few more are neglected. For instance, the model exhibits the spatial relationships between the DNA components but doesn?t take account of the character of the existing bonds between them. In conclusion, models are used in various manner in science. They serve different functions among which you may find practical and theoretical. Theoretical models are innovative mental constructions based on imagination, perception and the ability to relate to already existing models. They end up in a combination of analogies that are usually open-ended and leave space for further development and possibility for shifts in interpretation. Models are usually taken very seriously but not literarily as they are only simplistic representations of complex phenomena. They can?t be defined as pictures of reality nor useful fictions, rather as inadequate and partial manners of imagining and creating what is not observable ? in theoretical models. http://www.religion-online.org/showchapter.asp?title=2238&C=2076 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Does language help or hinder the way we acquire knowledge?

    Knowledge is widely based upon the things we learn from our education. Education is a system that we use to develop our own knowledge. Teachers are an example that knowledge can be passed from a person to another. Every day students in classes gain knowledge from their teachers.

  2. Are scientific models useful, despite their inaccuracies?

    Basically Bohr's model has been oversimplified to the point of it being, arguably, wrong. However, from a teacher's point of view, it is not necessarily wrong; Bohr's model effectively conveys the idea of different shells which is true and this cannot be illustrated through the model of the electron cloud.

  1. What might be meant by Nietzche's comment that "rational thought is interpretation according to ...

    In addition, I believe spontaneity also comes from the desire to do something because you feel that it would be fun, and you have your motives to believe so. Now, how does this influence the way we acquire knowledge? I think that it conditions which things actually we remember and which we don't.

  2. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Most likely yes. Do the majority of people in the world agree upon this? Most likely not, but I find that in the end it matters not of what people think of who and who are not to be called experts, more if the people who are willing to be called experts, meet the requirements in order to carry this prestigious title.

  1. Comparing Flatland and Plato's analogy of the cave.

    Finally the circle is completed and the sphere says, "Now what I want you to do is to rotate the circle! What he has in mind is that the man in Flatland will rotate the circle about its diameter producing a sphere, but

  2. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Let us take history as an area of knowledge for example. Today's events are tomorrow's history, thus if this very day was ever mentioned in history books, nobody but nobody can ever tell me what I was doing as they are not authorized to say so.

  1. TOK essay- Can language be said to hinder thought?

    When labels are used on people, they are called stereotypes. These stereotypes limit our view on people, therefore limiting our thought. A stereotype is an idea or belief (often inaccurate) about what another person is like, based on what group that person belongs to. Stereotypes are a type of prejudice.

  2. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Thus opinions can be dangerous as well. It is the fundamental right of a man to speak and express his opinions freely. But opinions are only opinions; they represent the belief and perception of man. They cannot always be held true. Moreover opinions vary from person to person, and knowledge is not based on opinions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work