• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is it possible to justify the different ways of knowing?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐TOK Essay 1/2011 Question: Is it possible to justify a hierarchy of different ways of knowing and, if so, on what basis? Name: Valerie Ng Suying TOK group: P1b (Mr Eric Lau) Index Number: 21 For many generations, humans have learnt to attain knowledge through many different ways including reason, sense perception and emotion. Reason is the way in which truth can be ascertained by thinking and the process of reflection alone (SOTA TOK Lecture 1). Sense perception is the awareness or apprehension of things by sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) and emotion, is any of the natural instinctive affections of the mind which come and go according to one?s personality, experiences and bodily state: a mental feeling (New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary). These ways of knowing have their own advantages and shortcomings and often lead to different new knowledge for a given environment or data set being considered or examined. Over time, humans have come to realize that the acquisition of knowledge can be made more efficient and effective if these ways of knowing are applied in a more structured manner. ...read more.

Middle

On the contrary, the one who is color-blind may see that the color has changed to say, purple instead of blue. Therefore, knowledge derived from sense perception is often not as precise. In spite of reason giving us a plausible and logical conclusion, there is a problem of induction where it is based on assumptions and sometimes prone to fallacies like hasty generalization. For example, in the area of mathematics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Premise 1: 0 has the property F. Premise 2: For every number n, if n has the property F then n+1 has the property F. Conclusion: Every number has the property F. The conclusion in the above example may not necessarily be true, but it nevertheless illustrates that the inductive reasoning process requires the examination of observations, ideas, outcomes and events, in order to find common themes to reach a unified conclusion (mindtools.com). In contrast, data is derived solely from the senses in sense perception, at times introducing bias in the process. Further, despite the shortcoming of induction, a reliable and accurate conclusion can still be achieved, given that one can easily state the exception to the universal statement or conclusion. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hence, emotion can easily mislead and impede a person from deriving at reliable and accurate knowledge. For example, valid scientific data cannot be obtained entirely through feelings or instincts. The same can be said about mathematics where emotions cannot be used to solve an equation or to prove a theorem (weblamp.princeton.edu). Conversely, sense perception, to a certain extent, could bring about a more reliable and accurate knowledge compared to emotion. Perception in some ways can be reliable if majority arrived at the same information using their senses, though this may not always be the case. In summary, though these ways of knowing work interdependently for one to obtain knowledge, they differ in their ability to provide consistent and precise knowledge. Emotion is heavily influenced by one?s belief, culture and religion, which may render it unreliable and inaccurate. Our senses have limitations, thus restricting us in attaining Knowledge as well. Reason however, provides a logical process that enables us to assimilate the information that is gathered through emotion and perception, thereby allowing us to decide whether the information is reliable and accurate. Hence, it can be concluded that it is indeed possible to justify a hierarchy of the different ways of knowing according to the criteria presented above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    have seen These can be eliminated by: Confirmation by another sense - If we doubt something which one of our senses perceives, it is reasonable to prove it by another one. Coherence - when things do not "fit in" they are to be doubted Independent testimony - when more people see the same thing, it is likely to be true.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    And because of the knowledge that I possess on each religion, I know that killing for selfish reasons (i.e. for one's own desires) is considered to be 'wrong', and is strictly forbidden in all the religions. The truth in ethics can also be considered 'absolute' because there are some rules that (depending on the person)

  1. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time Perception Deception

    These are instances which would normally cause people to erupt with emotion; grief, exaggeration, and extreme infatuation. However, because emotion, just like perception, is unique to the one who experiences it, Christopher experiences tremendous feeling when he discovers that his father lied about his mother dying and killed Wellington, his neighbor's dog.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

    Because of these truth's dependency upon emotions, at what point should a fine line be drawn between personal opinions and "soft" truths actually based on some evidence? Honestly, I do not think such a separation is necessary. They go hand-in-hand with each other and "soft" truths ought to be built off opinions, emotions, and facts.

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    The murdered do haunt their murderers, I believe. I know that ghosts have wandered on earth. Be with me always ? take any form ? drive me mad! only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you!

  2. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    This can lead us to believe that as experience increases, then the more reliable our senses can become to lead us to truth, although not in the case of an independent reality. Reason is an invaluable way of determining whether something is true or not.

  1. Examine the Claim That It Is Possible to Attain Knowledge Despite Problems of Bias ...

    Say for instance, the book Records of the Grand Historian also known as Shi Ji which was the magnum opus of Sima Qian. It is a book which he recounted Chinese history from the time of the Yellow Emperor until his own time.

  2. TOK Essay. The entire accuracies of mathematics and the natural sciences rely on the ...

    So language is a necessity in the natural sciences. For perception, the natural sciences require you to use your senses almost always. In chemistry, biology, and physics, you need your eyes to observe your experiments. You may also need to touch, for example in chemistry, to see if a reaction is endothermic or exothermic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work