• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Psychology a Science? According to one of the articles read in class, Is psychology a science? by Ellie Dommett, many suggest that psychology is indeed a science as it uses scientific methods.

Extracts from this document...


Is Psychology a science? According to one of the articles read in class, 'Is psychology a science?' by Ellie Dommett, many suggest that psychology is indeed a science as it uses scientific methods. Psychologists who defend their subject also use this as an argument. Initially, when looking into this question I believed that psychology is a science to some extent; it really depends on what approaches are used in psychology. I would first think that when only biological factors (e.g. hormones in the role of attraction) are used to explain a certain human behaviour, then that would make psychology a science. However, the human mind (especially over the recent years with exposure to media) is too complex to be explained with the Biological Perspective solely. These days, the cognitive perspective seems to be more popular for explanations of the human behaviour, and unfortunately the cognitive approach (internal processing of the mind) cannot be so easily studied, as it is the study of 'unobservable mental processes'. ...read more.


rather than differences in personality. Now, to elaborate into the definition of science, the requirements for something to be defined as a science are: (still from the same source, simplypsychology) "Empirical evidence, objectivity, control (over variables), predictability, hypothesis testing, and replication". Just about all psychology experiments have all these (except unethical studies which are less likely to be replicable), except for objectivity. Claims in psychology come easily biased as it depends a lot on the psychologist's mind. For example, in observations psychologists may to have different interpretations of what they observed, leading to different conclusions. In experiments, psychologists choose the independent variables though it can be a well many other things that could've been the independent variable and lead to the same result. In a way psychology is almost as subjective as the arts. Like previously mentioned, we are able to conduct research and collect empirical data for psychology, draw a hypothesis and theory in order to attempt a phenomena, just like science. ...read more.


Perhaps one day if a machine was invented to really read and analyse minds, then psychology could be seen no different to the study of particles and electrons. The machine would help to obtain objectivity, which is a component that psychologists up to these days still lack. An American philosopher Thomas Kuhn (1990), said that 'psychology is a pre-science' which supports my theory above. As philosopher Kinder (1929) said, the lack of progress in certain sciences - and I will be referring to psychology here - is because of the 'lack of suitable methods for the investigation'. The instruments used in psychology are human minds - humans study humans in psychology. The instrument itself so far is deemed as impossible to obtain objectivity. In conclusion, I believe that psychology is a science, but we have not yet found an appropriate method that would let us discover things about the human mind that have certain laws, just like biology, chemistry, and physics. Note: Science itself is a term created by humans - the definition for this can very well change. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    them to different conclusions, this means that the way they would perceive situations would be different resulting in different explanations for the events that take place.

  2. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    used to explain the events in each of the both knowledge areas must be shown. The most lucid divergence between science and history is that science must always be exact. There is no space for estimations in science, because it is a knowledge area that relies on accurate quantitative data.

  1. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Tu Bao : Yes, I agree. Novels and scientific psychology basically portray both human life and personality. But it also bugs me that, to what extent can we gain reliable knowledge of human personality and human life through these two mediums?

  2. Theory of Knowledge; Scientific Methods Essay.

    it's impossible to test that hypothesis unless you try to become an astronomer. Finally, I will talk about the third scientific method which known as the "Scientific Revolution". This method is simply we replace the old system with completely new or fixed system. There are already normal science paradigm exists.

  1. For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view ...

    As we have explored the scientific method and problem with inductive knowledge we know that science is ever changing and constantly evolving. New observations and discoveries are made every day therefore we have to constantly bear in mind that a single idea backed up by a particular observation may be changed or falsified entirely in time to come.

  2. The Provisional Nature of Science

    These interpretations can vary because of many aspects; one of the most important ones is religion. For instance, if there is a painting of a cow, a Christian might think of it as a source of meat, while a Hindu might look at this image and see a sacred animal that can't be killed for meat.

  1. Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between ...

    if we will be able to travel to the future one day? Science cannot give an answer yet because we do not have the philosophical understanding nor the technology to make us travel to the future and the information we have it is not enough but as technology keeps advancing

  2. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    For some, image is more important than true love. Catherine decided it was best for her and her family to give up her true love, and that?s exactly what she did. Whether or not Catherine was happy with Edgar Linton is questionable, but it wasn?t important.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work