• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Psychology a Science? According to one of the articles read in class, Is psychology a science? by Ellie Dommett, many suggest that psychology is indeed a science as it uses scientific methods.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is Psychology a science? According to one of the articles read in class, 'Is psychology a science?' by Ellie Dommett, many suggest that psychology is indeed a science as it uses scientific methods. Psychologists who defend their subject also use this as an argument. Initially, when looking into this question I believed that psychology is a science to some extent; it really depends on what approaches are used in psychology. I would first think that when only biological factors (e.g. hormones in the role of attraction) are used to explain a certain human behaviour, then that would make psychology a science. However, the human mind (especially over the recent years with exposure to media) is too complex to be explained with the Biological Perspective solely. These days, the cognitive perspective seems to be more popular for explanations of the human behaviour, and unfortunately the cognitive approach (internal processing of the mind) cannot be so easily studied, as it is the study of 'unobservable mental processes'. ...read more.

Middle

rather than differences in personality. Now, to elaborate into the definition of science, the requirements for something to be defined as a science are: (still from the same source, simplypsychology) "Empirical evidence, objectivity, control (over variables), predictability, hypothesis testing, and replication". Just about all psychology experiments have all these (except unethical studies which are less likely to be replicable), except for objectivity. Claims in psychology come easily biased as it depends a lot on the psychologist's mind. For example, in observations psychologists may to have different interpretations of what they observed, leading to different conclusions. In experiments, psychologists choose the independent variables though it can be a well many other things that could've been the independent variable and lead to the same result. In a way psychology is almost as subjective as the arts. Like previously mentioned, we are able to conduct research and collect empirical data for psychology, draw a hypothesis and theory in order to attempt a phenomena, just like science. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps one day if a machine was invented to really read and analyse minds, then psychology could be seen no different to the study of particles and electrons. The machine would help to obtain objectivity, which is a component that psychologists up to these days still lack. An American philosopher Thomas Kuhn (1990), said that 'psychology is a pre-science' which supports my theory above. As philosopher Kinder (1929) said, the lack of progress in certain sciences - and I will be referring to psychology here - is because of the 'lack of suitable methods for the investigation'. The instruments used in psychology are human minds - humans study humans in psychology. The instrument itself so far is deemed as impossible to obtain objectivity. In conclusion, I believe that psychology is a science, but we have not yet found an appropriate method that would let us discover things about the human mind that have certain laws, just like biology, chemistry, and physics. Note: Science itself is a term created by humans - the definition for this can very well change. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    them to different conclusions, this means that the way they would perceive situations would be different resulting in different explanations for the events that take place.

  2. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    strictly from the perspective of a young Arabian immigrant in Stockholm and is exceptionally subjective in it's storytelling I experienced understanding of the main character and his cultural confusion, thusly gaining knowledge of his behaviour and feelings, and therefore of his personality.

  1. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    This data must support a hypothesis, and it must be confirmed by practical experimentation. History on the other hand may leave questions unanswered or give many unsure answers to one question, which in many cases creates enigmas. Modern historians can only obtain knowledge about past events if they have data explaining the happenings.

  2. work based project

    The Ward Manager mentioned that cutbacks in the food menu and other areas were needed to meet the budget and therefore I was urged to quash hopes of games sessions as funding would be needed for items such as balls etc.

  1. Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between ...

    if we will be able to travel to the future one day? Science cannot give an answer yet because we do not have the philosophical understanding nor the technology to make us travel to the future and the information we have it is not enough but as technology keeps advancing

  2. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    As she experiences new things, she starts to blend in with them and change to where she is. The setting is important because it helps us better understand who and why Jane and Heathcliff are who they are. Being stuck in a mansion and working for the rich stopped them from achieving their goals.

  1. P. Dirac quote - both poetry and science contribute in the expansion of humans ...

    Science is mostly based on facts and theories. The theories will either eventually turn into facts or be disproved due to new advanced investigations. Scientists live their life seeking the ultimate truth, answers of unanswerable questions, and answers of and about things in the world we live in.

  2. What are good reasons and bad reasons for funding scientific research ? Refer ...

    Instead research funded by public domains as the government, should and usually is not driven by profit because it's research findings belong directly to the public. It is always good to fund research, because it is essential that we continue to question and investigate our world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work