• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing and can only people are harmful?

Extracts from this document...


TOK Essay by Almos Antolik; Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing and can only people are harmful? First of all you must look at the definition of the word knowledge to be able the tackle both questions. What is knowledge? According to the encyclopaedia knowledge is what a person knows, the facts and information, skills, and understanding that one has gained through learning and experience. According to my notes knowledge is information evaluated and organised in the human mind so that it can be used purposefully. It is based on facts, it is something that can be justified, it is what you have been told and you think is correct and true. Knowledge is information associated with rules; it is something we can use for useful purposes during our life time. Also important to mention that knowledge can be justified belief: it is what you need develop certain skills and be able to use those skills. After defining the word knowledge, I can easily conclude my point of view on the second question "is all knowledge inherently a good thing and can only people be harmful". I think that knowledge itself is no harm to anyone; it is only harmful when people start using it in the wrong way. ...read more.


In fact, in some countries it is strictly forbidden to study cloning. Why do you think this is? Governments can already see that some of us will use cloning in the wrong way and will make money out of it. It can be a huge business in the future. How awesome would it be to create another Einstein or Stalin? Government therefore want to avoid this in the future and ban cloning. I believe that there should be no knowledge at all which we should not seek, because knowledge itself is neutral, it does not harm anyone. The problems only start to come when we start using them in the wrong way. Some people's religions for example disagree with certain types of knowledge. It is really a matter of opinion of each individual of what type of knowledge we should or should not seek. Going back to the middle-ages, the Christian churches forbid the study of science. At the time hundreds and thousands were killed who claimed that the earth was round. That knowledge was simply forbidden to keep the majority under control, under the control of religion, although a little later everybody knew that in fact the earth is round. ...read more.


We are destroying other life so that we survive. By cutting down rainforests and releasing harmful gases into the atmosphere creating global warming we are at the same time wiping out entire species of animals and plants and at the same times we are harmful to ourselves. So I assume that again, possessing knowledge itself does not harm anyone, nor benefit anyone. Knowledge from a harmful person can be passed on to a good person without the result of any harm. The second person still has the choice of whether to use the knowledge for good or harmful purposes. This, l think is the most important point that we should consider when tackling the question, is there knowledge we should not seek? Therefore to the other question, is all knowledge inherently a good thing and can only people are harmful, l would say that yes only people can be harmful, knowledge itself cannot help anyone nor harm anyone in any possible way at all. If someone is harmed, that is the result of the people not the knowledge itself which we can say was miss used in this case, it is the people's decisions how to use there knowledge after all. Since knowledge itself is neither good nor harmful, there is no reason to avoid certain categories of knowledge. Every type of knowledge equally has the potential to develop daily life, and interfere with it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Should Chemical and Biological Weapons be banned?

    No one has ever been arrested." (Otis Kramer, Chemical Weapons Are A Necessary Evil,2009) This supports the idea even though CBW is dangerous the casualties which can be caused by a single attack is still limited. With the government responding to these attacks quickly and efficiently and putting effective and rigorous controls over the harmful chemicals the number of victims suffering can be reduced even more.

  2. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    Humans are visually oriented and use their smell the least. Empiricism - school of philosophy that says all knowledge is based on perceptual experience Common-sense realism - a theory according to which perception is passive and only gives us an accurate image of reality.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    It anticipates how sleep-learning would be used to change the society by controlling the minds of the children. But it was not born totally out of his imagination. He studied the effects of the advanced technologies of chemical industries and Industrial Revolution and based on the contemporary concerns of the early 20th century he made predictions about the 24th century.

  2. Theory of Knowledge

    The first statement basically just regurgitates the idea of cultural relativism in a different way. Cultural relativism proposes that people of different cultures, have different upbringings, different experiences in life, and generally receive a different amount of perceptual evidence. In the modern context, however, the general content of that which

  1. Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good ...

    But unfortunately it is not possible to prognosticate such things, hence we cannot know whether the knowledge should or should not be sought. But still, if it was real to predict the results, it would be possible to evaluate the necessity of seeking the particular knowledge, by assessing the benefits and harms brought by the knowledge.

  2. What has driven you to seek out certain kinds of knowledge?

    If a poor family requires their child to help with the business and cannot afford the school tuition fees, that child will likely never develop the desire to seek out certain types of knowledge that is offered in educational institutions, such as geography, history or chemistry.

  1. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now ...

    Until and unless the person doesn?t acquire or is hungry to acquire knowledge, he won?t be able to imagine because that is where the power to manifest in you lies. If we look at the scenario from the psychological point of view of the person?s developing stage then there we get to unfold the reality of the Albert?s statement.

  2. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    With this technology applied, the Facebook system could recognize a person?s facial features and save all the data they have collected into a database. The Facebook system can identify the person in any photo with help from information saved in the database and tag the person immediately.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work