• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing, and can only persons be harmful?

Extracts from this document...


Orlovska Lasma 11IB Essay #1 Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing, and can only persons be harmful? Knowledge itself is actually neutral, it is neither good, nor bad. It can be partially evaluated only after it has been obtained and applied by a person, assessing the means how the knowledge has been obtained and the consequences that have occurred after applying the knowledge. However, even then the evaluation is very subjective, as the criteria of good and bad may vary, depending from the society, which is the judge in most cases, and in fact all the knowledge can be used in both, good and the bad way. As knowledge is neutral, all of it should be sought, but the attention should be paid to the way it is being used. The first step is obtaining the knowledge. Different knowledge can be acquired in different ways and there are also ways that cause a lot of harm and damage. A serious decision has to be made, if one sees that the output of a particular knowledge brings a lot of impairment. The person has to try to prognosticate whether the knowledge obtained will be worth all the victims and damages, or better the output of the knowledge should be cancelled, because the knowledge will of a smaller value than everything lost in the search of it. ...read more.


Another reason for not using the knowledge could be the fact that doing it, will bring damage. Knowing that getting hit by a car can injure or even kill you, but not employing the knowledge, is an example of it. Knowledge may remain unemployed also in cases when one does not know how to apply it. For example, I cannot make use of knowing that acid rain damages tree leaves. There is actually a lot of unapplied knowledge in most human beings, but as all of it is neutral, nothing is changed by the fact that it exists somewhere in our brains. If the knowledge itself would be bad, then it would do some harm, for example, to our brain. Knowledge could be called bad if it constantly destroyed parts of our brain, or it would erase other knowledge. Of course I cannot prove that we do not forget some knowledge because of acquiring another, but it also has not been proved that it is that way, therefore we might consider all the knowledge to be neutral as it does not perform any good or bad processes while it is being kept into our brains and mind. If the knowledge has been obtained and kept into one's mind (or maybe written down somewhere), sooner or later a situation in which the knowledge can be put into use appears. ...read more.


As an example I could mention a very current issue - probable war in the Afghanistan. Lets accept the fact of the atomic weapons in Afghanistan as certain, so they have already applied the knowledge of constructing the weapons, and undoubtedly they have the knowledge how to apply those weapons. In case if they decide to make use of the in ware against USA, then the consequences of it will be destructive to the inhabitants of the United States, but the people of Afghanistan probably will be rather satisfied. For me, it seems obvious that the consequences are negative as I cannot approve killing of innocent people, but for those in Afghanistan it may seem fine, and neither person has the rights to say that their perception of things is wrong. Knowledge, as a justified true belief, is neutral, it is only possible to make subjective assessments of the way the knowledge has been obtained and the way it has been applied, but as those evaluations are highly biased no quality of knowledge can be estimated. As knowledge can be neither good, nor bad, people are those who may use the knowledge in harmful or destructive manner, but only subjectively harmful or destructive manner, as also the evaluation of it can vary. Therefore it is possible to conclude that the knowledge itself is highly neutral, and the assessments made in connection with it are greatly subjective. Word count: 1308 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Is Greed good?

    as a motivator spurring people on to succeed in achieving their wants, biographies and television and magazine interviews about successful, greed-orientated people being some of the dominant sources. Therefore, 'greed' may no longer be considered a principle that should be utterly avoided but rather, a principle that can hopefully spice up one's motivation.

  2. How can we know when we have made progress in the search of knowledge?

    Throughout history, totalitarian governments, just like the one in 1984 have used phrases and slogans to convince their citizens that unethical actions are right. Language is another thing that ethics and history have in common, and it is how history is passed down from generation to generations.

  1. Theory of Knowledge

    Because the United States allows its citizens to choose, some of my cousins, uncles, and friends chose to become gay, believing it was due to change in ideas and environment. There is nothing wrong to have homosexual aspects in part of someone's life, like my own relatives.

  2. Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge a good thing? ...

    have been developed more and are more dangerous and life threatening than in early times. The knowledge of how to use these weapons has circulated in the populations of the world meaning more and more weapons are used for self-defense hence leading to more deaths.

  1. Theory of Knowledge

    The first statement basically just regurgitates the idea of cultural relativism in a different way. Cultural relativism proposes that people of different cultures, have different upbringings, different experiences in life, and generally receive a different amount of perceptual evidence. In the modern context, however, the general content of that which

  2. Justification, what distinguishes a good justification from a bad one?

    Richard Lagemaat and I agree that life is too short to be skeptical about everything, so you should only doubt things when it is appropriate. Many philosophers agree that reason gives us a greater certainty than perception. And although reason is the best way to justify a claim, it still could have many errors.

  1. What has driven you to seek out certain kinds of knowledge?

    The last motivating factor in the pursuit of knowledge is self-improvement, which holds the biggest potential of all. Self-improvement includes pursuing goals and aspirations, incentives, growth in oneself, and ultimately, happiness.

  2. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    is highly under persuasive censorship and the surfers have a limited access to the Internet. China is a prime example. It has marked itself out and highly censors and represses the use of the Internet and access to information about sensitive topics in China.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work