• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this true in the Human Sciences and Ethics?

Extracts from this document...


[Kevin TOK Essay] July 6, 2013 ?Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are.? To what extent is this true in the Human Sciences and Ethics? Socrates once said, ?To know, is to know that you know nothing. That is the meaning of true knowledge? [1]. In similar vein, Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, ?Knowledge is knowing that we cannot know? [1]. A great Indian master, Nisargadatta Maharaj once quoted, ?To know what you are, you must first investigate and know what you are not? [2]. What were Socrates, Emerson, Nisargadatta hinting at? Is there any such thing as ?knowledge? and if so, can this knowledge ever give us a sense of who we are? Is there one concrete sense of ?who we are? that persists all throughout our lives or is our sense of identity a montage of ever-changing psychological and behavioral dynamics? Is the knower even capable of using ways of knowing to grasp a sense of who he/she is? If so, which way of knowing is more trustworthy and which area of knowledge should these ways of knowing be applied to, to get a better sense of who one is? Human sciences provides a sense of how we behave in the social context but not a sense of who we are at a personal level while Natural sciences while Thesis (?.) ...read more.


All in all, over time, such cultural acclimatization forms one?s sense of identity. Even though, the cultural idiosyncrasies defined through diverse language interpretations are subjective, as part of a race, tribe or group in society, the language used is objective, unaffected by the growing circumstances of humans. Therefore, although humans are a specific species of animals, social and cultural knowledge gives us a larger sense of who we are as collective bodies. But does this Cultural and language identity, give one a sense of who one really is? Isn?t it wise to first understand what is this ?sense of identity? that we are applying this knowledge to ? In the first place, is there a common identity that we humans share? Or, are we individual bubbles with our own unique set of psychological and physiological identities? National and cultural identities aim to segregate humans to different sense of belongings, but knowledge about such social roles may not define who each individual really is. A certain culture of humans may have a sense of nationalistic or cultural identity, however, each individual is free and entitled to their own rights, opinions and unrestricted in their thoughts. Thus, knowledge in the human sciences does not give humans a sense of who they are but rather, it only gives humans a sense of who they are in terms of social position and function, but not what differentiates them from other humans as unique beings. ...read more.


On a more philosophical note, is there a part of one?s identity that is beyond of knowledge? In other words, is there a sense of the knower that isn?t derived from knowledge concepts? Enlightened mystics have claimed time and again that there is an unchanging ?self? that is devoid of all knowledge labels. In fact, Indian mystic U.G. Krishnamurthi, once said that, ?We are using the neurons, our memory, constantly to maintain our identity. Whether you are awake, asleep or dreaming, this process is carried on. But, it is wearing you out? The so called self-realization is the discovery for yourself and by yourself that there is no self to discover? [13]. If U.G is given the benefit of the doubt, then with what ways of knowing does the knower traverse on the inward path of self-realization? If Socrates? statement that true knowledge is knowing that one knows nothing is agreed with, then does Knowledge, in the TOK sense of the word, still give one a sense of what one really is? Having said this though, in the normal sense of who we think we are, Ethics, as an area of knowledge, by way of emotions/intuition, provides a strong sense of who we are. On the other hand, since reason, sense perception and language are part of knowledge acquisition in most Human Science fields, one has to exercise caution to prevent being a victim of fallacious deductive and inductive reasoning traps in one?s buildup of identity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Also, the dominant paradigm in psychology influences what aspects of personality to observe, and how to observe it.

  2. "The arts deal in the particular, the individual, and the personal. While the sciences ...

    This brings about the traditional opinion of how "sciences" and "arts" are two completely dissimilar areas of knowledge and any links between the two can only be found as differences. Over centuries of dismissing arts and sciences into two completely different corners of knowledge, opinions have been formed by humans

  1. TOK Essay on Natural Sciences

    I do not think there are any specific areas of scientific knowledge which are morally unacceptable or required however I do consider certain methods of obtaining knowledge and some intended usage of gained knowledge are morally unacceptable. For example, to investigate and discover stem cells, embryonic cells are required as

  2. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    These subjects are based on observations and want to achieve theories and new discoveries about human nature. But studying humans is much more than studying animals or other existing things because human have characteristics other species do not have such as self-consiousness,language,reason,free-will and creativity.

  1. Human sciences - the language of questionnaires

    For example, if someone asked something in a very formal tone, the person answering would use logic to understand how to answer and with what type of language. An other example can be when someone is asked a question in a certain language, logically this person will answer in that language.

  2. TOK Socrates Summary of Euthyphro, The Apology, and Crito. Applying This To ...

    In the dialogue, The Apology, Socrates makes his argument as to why he is not guilty for corrupting the youth of Athens. He explains that the oracle of Delphi claimed he was the wisest of all men. Socrates came to the conclusion that this meant he was wise in the sense that he was aware that he knew nothing.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and ...

    Although this shows that disagreement aids the pursuit of knowledge but many of these pursuits will be pointless ones. When a scientist produces a generally acceptable theory, such as ?Cells are the smallest unit of life?, it will be more likely for it to be true than for it to be false.

  2. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    In some cases it could be argued that the general public will often believe what they want to believe despite evidence to the contrary. In these instances we have to rely upon the integrity and honesty of those presenting the ideas, data etc.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work