• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Knowledge is a true organ of sight

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Knowledge is a true organ of sight, not the eyes" is a quite interesting quote by Panchatantra. To answer this question it would be easiest that one would first translate it into an easy understandable sentence with a clear message, since this quote can have multiple meanings. The way I found this quote to make the most sense is when I translated it into the following sentence; Knowledge is a real consultable source of seeing, not the eyes. I find this the best translation to understand this quote, since it is very clear and straightforward. The next questions one could ask him/herself is: Is the quote true, and till what extent is this quote true. Is the quote "Knowledge is a true organ of sight, not the eyes" true or not? To say if the quote is true or not is a big statement to make right away, therefore I found It easiest to look at an example which could help to understand this quote better. A good example to start off with is this: When one is watching television and one sees something on the news about an arrested murderer and one sees his face one might think, he looks like such a nice guy, but one knows that he did commit murder and therefore is probably not such a nice guy as one thought initially. ...read more.

Middle

When taking this in account it can be said that the quote by Panchatantra "Knowledge is a true organ of sight, not the eyes" might not be fully correct, since the human depends on both the sources, knowledge and sight. It therefore only applies till a certain extent. When we relate this quote to science a whole new view gets created, when we look at biology we can see that observation by eye sight is needed to gain knowledge most of the time. Eye sight is initially needed for the first researchers to have gained this information. How would we have had all this knowledge if we did not find it out initially, it was initially found out by observing by eye, and therefore the eyes can also be seen as a true organ of sight. If eye sight was not available human beings would not have gained a lot of knowledge, and therefore human beings have to rely on both sources of sight and not just one. For facts; known things, one could say that knowledge is the only true organ of sight. This because if one does not know red is red he/she could call if differently. ...read more.

Conclusion

When this knowledge was not available, one could not depend on our knowledge mostly to develop our sight, therefore it would need, what can be seen as more primitive ways of creating sight. By looking at all of the previous examples one might conclude that knowledge is incredibly a better organ of sight than the eyes, it is more fundamental, however to say that the eyes are not an organ of sight would be wrong. This would be wrong, since a lot of knowledge is achieved by observing with your eyes. All of the known knowledge did not come naturally it had to be observed or found in a different way initially. If one of the organs is not working properly for instance when one believes blue to be red a faulty image will be created as said before, therefore both organs are dependent on each other, and both needed to have sight. I found it nice to look at it as a body; a body has various organs, some more important ones than others, but when one of the organs malfunctions an error will occur; therefore we cannot neglect a single organ like knowledge, or eyes. All organs have a certain importance to them and they all apply till a certain extent. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What can be meant by the Panchantantra saying, Knowledge is the true organ of ...

    as being a farce, as one day running late for school I looked outside the window and saw that it was sunny, I thus decided to run to school without a coat, big mistake. This thus resulted in me freezing like an icicle, not the best start to a day.

  2. "What I tell you three times is true." (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula - ...

    One thing that is important to notice is that the aforementioned formula does not essentially have to be used to prove things that are not necessarily true to be true, but can also work with things that are already know to be true.

  1. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    This phenomenon is referred to as confirmation bias. Consequently, this confirmation bias could prove repetition as an ineffective method of arriving at truth because a scientist could simply discount a conclusion or any experimentation results as long as they do not conform to what they believe.

  2. "What I tell you three times is true" (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula- or ...

    For example, Newton's First Law of Motion, which states that in the absence of an unbalance force, a body in motion will remain in motion. We can't test this theory since we don't have the physical capabilities. As we encounter things that we cannot test, we use logic and trust.

  1. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    During the last few years of the search some scientists were even relishing the idea that the particle might not exist, allowing for whole new avenues of theoretical physics and the standard model. The obvious benefit being the opportunity to rethink our basic understanding of sub-atomic physics and produce new theories to be explored and postulated.

  2. Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes". Discuss.

    To explain this further let me take an example. When we drive to work or school, we generally take the same route daily. When taking that route, we use of knowledge of the first, second and however many more drives to allow us to know what we should see and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work