• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Knowledge is generated through the interaction of critical and creative thinking. Evaluate this statement in two areas of knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TOK Essay 1. Knowledge is generated through the interaction of critical and creative thinking. Evaluate this statement in two areas of knowledge. It is important to be able to distinguish between critical and creative thinking. As an international baccalaureate student, it's important for me to apply these two ways of thinking. Rather than simply critically analyzing a lot of problems, such as solving math based on rules and equations taught, I am expected to create new ways to help me understand every subject. Though creative and critical thinking may be the two sides of the same coin, they are not identical and go hand in hand when making predictions and gaining knowledge. In one of my favorite genres of television, murder mystery, exploring the areas of human sciences and history can be used to help make predictions upon which the killer might act (creative) as well as evaluating their possible motives for doing so (critical). I shall attempt to evaluate the interaction between these two thought processes within the areas of human sciences and history in forensics. In the ABC hit show, Castle, a famous murder mystery writer accompanies a New York City detective on her cases. What draws these two together is their interest in why murderers do what they do to their victims, or their motives for murder. ...read more.

Middle

Are they experiencing any emotional distress? Are there any "tells" to their reactions? Do they have any reason to kill the victim? So, we can see how the two types of thinking interact in the process of forensics. Psychology, which is part of human sciences, comes into play when the detectives need to understand the suspects and try to find every possible explanation to the murderer's motive and get the suspect to either confess their crime or help them in their investigation. Sometimes, it's a mind game that tries to get the other player to "show his cards." The detectives need to know what works and what doesn't in order to effectively get a suspect to talk. In their experience with their job, most of the time, their intimidation and use of "threats" eventually pays off, with the exception of cases with professionals, or contract killers. Psychology is used to predict the suspects' possible next move, which is effective for cases involving tracking down a serial killer. The use of psychology, or human sciences, to gain knowledge is very limited. Because every person is unique in their actions and reactions, people cannot be expected to react the same way under the same circumstances, but there are a few generalizations that may still be useful. ...read more.

Conclusion

In reference to the knowledge issue, history and human sciences play an essential part in a homicide investigation because that is where explanations about why people do what they do come from and whether it's actually "normal" for the person to do it. One very good quote from the TV show helps generalize the killer's mind and allows their motives to make sense. "There are only three reasons to commit a murder: love, money, and to cover up a crime." However, I would probably include that a serial killer is somewhat with great trauma in their past, and they commit murders because their minds are unstable. Either way, this is still a very simplistic idea that addresses the history of why humans do what they do. Once the murderer's motive is verified, then the rest of the investigation would be based on evidence and analysis on how the murderer carried out this crime. Most of the knowledge that detectives gain their knowledge during the investigation come from the interaction of creative and critical thinking, which make up their occupation of being a detective, or a murder mystery novelist. Their whole thought process is engaged with these two ways of thinking and the outcome of the investigation relies on their skill to analyze the facts and find different perspectives or motives. The use of such cognitive skills or strategies must be in coexistence to increase the probability of a desirable outcome, like solving a case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Science has both similarities and differences in the way it approaches knowledge as compared ...

    It's not real, it's just the delusion. Secondly, objective is not real. Objects are just the illusion of our eyes, and thirdly, the world is too mysterious that our mind and technology cannot explore anything or know nothing about the world.

  2. Doubt is the key to knowledge (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true ...

    is modified by using these doubts about its rules and statements, is mathematics which is "the study of shape structure and quantity, also seek out patterns and formulate new conjectures, furthermore seek for new statements from known definitions through deduction".

  1. To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas ...

    Belief and opinion can change the information, as the stories can become exaggerated, the meanings of words can be changed or misunderstood, and emotive language can sway people's views. But language should be relied on because if it has been passed on through generations, it must be important.

  2. To what extent are areas of knowledge shaped by their past? Consider with reference ...

    However, these same verses are interpreted differently by Islamic extremists who claim that the specific words used in this ?eye for an eye? passage place an emphasis on a violent path to justice in a wider majority of circumstances and then use this interpretation to justify their many abhorrent attacks on humanity.

  1. TOK Essay - Can we trust reason in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider 2 ...

    Should one pull the lever? Based on which type of reason is being employed by the knower, the ethical landscape is filled with myriad of solutions.

  2. Doubt is the key to knowledge, explain with reference to two areas of knowledge.

    But is there any evidence which religion is true? As per Genesis, god created the earth out of chaos in 7 days. He created Adam and Eve in his own image. Be it the Greek, roman or the Christian civilization, the god is described as anthropomorphic. The famous Greek philosopher Xenophanes claimed that if Oxen or Horses or Lions

  1. Can we know when to trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider ...

    History is an area of knowledge that plays a momentous role in our quest for knowledge. It is said that out future is built on the pillars of the past, and that in order we have a glorious future we need to unravel the past layer by layer.

  2. "That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider some of ...

    entirety, claiming it had no sound theological basis.? Lord Bentinck wrote that this practice led to gender bias on the society, and gave a number of rational explanations why this practice had started in India. Gradually the Hindus learned that this practice was outlawed and illegal, and many reforms were created in the society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work