• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Knowledge Vs Opinion Vs Propaganda

Extracts from this document...


Theory of Knowledge Essay 1. There are many different authorities, including academies, politicians, global organisations and companies, who make knowledge claims. As an experienced TOK student, what criteria do you use to distinguish between knowledge, opinion and propaganda? In the modern and technological age of the 21st century, every human being around the world is united through the relentless flow of information that is forcefully being driven into our minds. As we live out our lives, we are continuously presented with this information at every turn, which, through the aid of our senses is then processed and interpreted in the appropriate procedure. Although this process is largely accepted, the flow of information has reached alarmingly high levels, to the extent that as a species we have not only gotten too familiar with the process, but have also learnt to overlook it completely. While this process of reasoning and classification has deteriorated, the veracity of information being presented to us has followed suit to capitalize on our credulousness, and by so leading us into readily accepting knowledge lacking both accuracy and reliability. It is by this nature that we have been introduced into two phases of knowledge known as opinion and propaganda, both deriving off information and carrying potential for knowledge, yet both ultimately facing severe inquiry if not disregard in our quest for understanding. ...read more.


While analysing any source, whether propaganda, opinion or even knowledge, it is crucial to understand the motivation, experience, research, and citations behind each of the references given. By doing this, and assuming that the source did in fact have reliable information, we are then required to test this out against the opinions present. However when looking at the opinions, this is not just limited to the outsiders perspective but also to the message behind the propaganda. This process makes a large portion of the procedure, where opinions in conjunction with facts are combined to create a final consensus, which we believe to be completely accurate in both a theoretical and practical sense, with no necessary relation to either the opinion or the propaganda presented. This end result can then be classified as a conclusion in science, or knowledge in terms of understanding. On the opposite scale of this equation lies the propaganda of knowledge interpretation. In this example this takes shape as religion, acting as the evident force fighting against stem cell research, while using any lengths to defame it. Having received the information from science, which is ultimately accurate and truthful, this party acts out against this, attempting to steer away the impression that the knowledge of stem cell research is spreading on its public. ...read more.


The search for understanding does in fact stem off information, opinion and propaganda, where critical thinkers undergo the procedure that they have grown used to. For me this criterion has been narrowed down to the knowledge area of science, where the differentiation between knowledge, opinion and propaganda takes place through a scientific experiment write up. This can however relate back to limitless areas of knowledge, however the choice is largely based on the individual and their way of knowing. For example, another criteria could be shown in a mathematical manner, where the original data, in either a graph of numbers can be interpreted as propaganda. Which is then put into an equation (acting as opinion), to create a constant or a formula (knowledge) applying to the entire data. There is no single criterion to distinguish between knowledge, opinion and propaganda as the information we are receiving is constantly changing. However as critical thinkers we can adapt to this by applying information to different areas of knowledge, where variables or 'double checking' are evident to ensure that the information we are receiving is in fact reliable, aiding us to form our opinion on it, and if this opinion is largely shared by the people involved and cannot be disproved, it can finally be seen as knowledge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Freewill vs Destiny and Science vs Religion essays

    What if destiny is real? Are all the choices we make useless? Are we going to end up in the same location no matter what we do? If destiny is real have we ever really made a choice in life? What is reality if what we believe to be real truly isn't?

  2. How does vocabulary shape our knowledge?

    However, some pieces of the meaning will always be lost to a certain degree, causing gaps within the translation of vocabularies and the doubts on their absolute meanings. When we observe from the aspect of mathematics, where Amazonians are restricted to count due to the limitation of numerical vocabularies, this

  1. Supernatural causes vs. Pathogen model of infectious disease

    There were no 'real' medicines as we understand them today. The art of medicine was largely in the hands of the Benedictine monks who provided only practical remedies that aimed at relieving the symptom and not actually cure the cause of the disease.

  2. Defining and Analysing Violence

    It is only a picture, displaying a snapshot of a situation with so many unknowns. Simply by judging the picture, a large number of classmates think it is violence, as there is physical contact and seems rather intense, while few thinks that there might a good reason behind such act,

  1. Empiricism vs. Rationalism

    rationally without falling back on the scientific theory that it must be physically evident to be true.

  2. Critical consideration: ethics of use of embryonic stem cells

    What might be the views of other-stakeholders in the debate-patients, doctors, parents, and research companies? Every people will have different opinions because they are in different positions, For the people in the stem cells research company, I think they have different purpose, some of the people only want to

  1. Emotion Vs Reason

    With regard to any science or experiment, a devised structure has been developed to allow for the end result gathered being both correct and reliable. This is achieved through the formation of an aim designed to either support or disprove a hypothesis by undertaking a variety of experiments bound by a number of variables.

  2. Free Will vs Determinism Questions

    is most influential? Any other factors? Do we have any choice over these categories? 1. I personally consider a person?s environmental nurture to be most influential over what decisions a person will make. Individuals all act so differently in every aspect of life, even though we all stem from the same human nature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work