• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Many differences and similarities can be seen whist taking science and poetry as a way of knowing; however, it is imperative we notice the links between the two as tools for human knowing.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry it's the exact opposite." (P A M Dirac) Do both the approaches suggested in the quotation enjoy equal success in expanding human knowledge? The expansion of knowledge is many a person's main goal. Like most goals, expanding knowledge ("familiarity, awareness, or understanding gained through experience or study"1) can be attained via many paths. These paths, or ways of knowing, include, among other channels, two very important, seemingly conflicting ones: science (a methodological activity, discipline, or study) and poetry (a piece of literature written in meter or verse). In order to explore each discipline's success in expanding knowledge their differences, similarities, links, and impacts must be explored. A difference that lies between the two could be in how each one serves in creating acceptable truths. Scientific truths, for example, are discovered while poetic truths are arbitrated. The former are known to already exist, as scientists seek them, while poetic ones are infinite and created via mediation. ...read more.

Middle

There are many differences between the two, with campaigners of both parties claiming each one more important to expanding human knowledge and criticizing each other's successes. Another view is that these differences are superficial and superfluous in the light of their similarities and importance to each other while expanding one realm. To understand each realm's contribution to human knowledge their similarities how they are connected to each other is also of vital importance. It is generally accepted that poets and scientists are both ingenious but the former lack analytical skill; the latter lack a powerful creative muscle. In an interesting speech made by Mae Jemison (who in 1992, was the first African-American woman to go into space and is now a campaigner for science education) she clearly identifies their links and similarities. She claims that science and art (poetry) work are both incarcerations of human creativity. She explains that science vs. poetry is not the analytical vs. the intuitive, as most believe. An example given was Albert Einstein's infamous formula E=mc2. ...read more.

Conclusion

Their sources are the same (human creativity), their results are the same(expanding human knowledge), and differ only in superficial and formal ways, with one being incomplete without the other. They are both immersed in each other's existence, weather one be the origin of the other, an extension of the other, or in collaboration with the other to create real solid outcomes, or expansions of human knowledge. In conclusion, many differences and similarities can be seen whist taking science and poetry as a way of knowing; however, it is imperative we notice the links between the two as tools for human knowing. They might yield different results achieved through different paths but both arise from the human quest to understand themselves and the universe. Without each other neither would be complete and neither would human potential to gain concrete knowledge, credible enough to satisfy the intuitive as well as the analytical aspect found in every single person. To me, expanding human knowledge is simply a goal. Science and poetry are different paths that intertwine continuously creating a third intermediary path, which is the only way to reach any expansion of knowledge, which, if restricted to any single realm, would be utterly futile. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    Nonetheless, the observation made for historical and scientific explanations both take into account the significance of perception. Perception can be defined as Perception plays a major role as a "way of knowing" for historiographers because each historiographer is different and will have had different experiences in life which would lead

  2. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    Science must be exact. The definition of the word "history" is: "1. the branch of knowledge dealing with past events, usually written as a chronological account;"2 History has the aim of accounting for past events without being biased, but it is difficult of assuring its veracity if there aren`t eye witnesses.

  1. Imagination as a Fifth Way of Knowing.

    This essay will discuss the role of imagination at large in our search for knowledge with respect to the areas of knowledge such as natural science and literature. I consider God as the first scientist and the first architect. Could He have made this beautiful world, swarming with beautiful life and diverse colors, without his imagination?

  2. As an IB student, how has your learning of history and science ...

    Darwin?s theory of evolution shows that both the individual and the society are still deluded. The modern man still believes that he is the offspring o Adam and Eve, and so is the case with modern societies. Most of the men and communities still believe that we have not descended

  1. As an IB student, how has your learning of literature and science contributed to ...

    And if science could achieve this impossible goal, we would be living in a Utopian society, and not in a patriarchal one, where there would be no crimes and injustice. Literature is very helpful in learning about the nature of an individual.

  2. P. Dirac quote - both poetry and science contribute in the expansion of humans ...

    These poems are the core of poetry. The sentences in poems create images and ideas in each person?s minds; this can be labeled to be ones imagination. In this case, imagination is the thought of a specific event, idea, or image in a person?s brain resulting from reading of sentences.

  1. Reason as a way of knowing

    Example: ?All boys I know love football. I am a boy. Therefore, I love football.? But although the process makes sense, since the first piece of information that ?all boys I know love football? may not be an accurate statement (as not all boys love football), then the statement cannot be correct.

  2. Emotion as a Way of Knowing

    This means for the Christians or Jews or people that believe in any ethnicity have loyalty to a certain belief of God and his way of how he believed people should live their lives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work