• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Neither Art nor Science can give us a complete knowledge of the world. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Neither Art nor Science can give us a complete knowledge of the world. Discuss. The most formal and probably also most correct (in TOK sense) way to define knowledge is something like "something to regard as true beyond doubt", or in other words something which is true. Personally, I believe that since the definition of knowledge says that what you know has to be true, it is incorrect to say that you know something. Who are we to claim what's true and what's not, when even the greatest of scientist and thinkers have claimed to know something which some hundred years later has been proved false? To simplify it, as Manuel in Fawlty Towers would have said; "I know nothing". ...read more.

Middle

In other words, although I don't deny the existence of absolute truth(s) , I do claim that it is not possible for us to with 100% certainty identify these possible truths, and hence my answer to the question is: no, we cannot know anything. It follows that if it is not possible to know anything, then knowing is impossible, and thus nothing, including art and science, can give us a complete knowledge of the world. This conclusion, in a nutshell, answers the question1, but I need about 400 words extra to fulfill the requirements of this essay-work. These words will be used to discuss the reliability of my conclusion, and the boundaries limiting me when writing. ...read more.

Conclusion

The second boundary is the capacity of my mind. The limits of my cognitivity makes it fairly "wrong" to make conclusions about something as "big" as knowledge and absolute truth. I believe that what I perceive is information, and the conclusions I make based on what I perceive is nothing but new information, and, as said by Albert Einstein, "Information is not knowledge". With this said, I can change my conclusion from "nothing can give a complete knowledge of the world", to a very simple: I don't know. 1 As it is impossible to know anything, then I don't know what I just concluded, but that is what I believe is the best and most correct answer to the questions raised in my discussion. Skagerak International School IB2 2003/2004 Subject: Theory Of Knowledge Teacher: Mr. Noakes Student: Robin Dominik Havre ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. "The theory of art as representation say we value art because it faithfully informs ...

    flawed, not perfect, is illuminated as men are shot and blown apart by their fellow man. However, whilst this is imparted upon us, another type of human experience is also illuminated; that of heroes and selfless acts of bravery in an effort to uphold the rightful laws of equality.

  2. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    Senses not only reflect the reality but actively construct it. Perceptual illusions Perception consists of two elements: Sensation - provided by the world Interpretation - provided by our minds ( usually subconscious) These things play an important role in perception: Context - what we perceive depends on the context, the

  1. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    Moreover, our perception has biological limitations. Humans can only perceive what our senses and nervous systems allow us to perceive.

  2. Should we trust science to give us a complete understanding of the world?

    To explain the procedure, in which the scientific method can be used to solve a problem I want to give the following example: Step 1: Stating the problem One cannot solve a problem without knowing what it is. Problem: 'For what values of x and y can 2x + y

  1. As an IB student, how has your learning of literature and science contributed to ...

    ?The evolution of the society when viewed from an unbiased, detached angle of perception will appear no more than an institutionalized journey of man towards progressive self-imposed slavery. For example, Blake in his Poem London says, In every voice, in every ban, The mind-forg'd manacles I hear.

  2. Tok Art Assignment: My reactions on visiting the Art Gallery

    Natural scenery can be considered art simply because it is beautiful or appealing. Depending on how one looks at things, anything can therefore be classified as ?art? to them. As long as it inspires an emotion of more than ordinary significance, ?it? can be classified as art.

  1. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Discuss.

    how could the humankind survive if we would not know that hot things can hurt us? That kind of knowledge is essential for human survival, without it, we would be in big trouble. There are lots of other examples of why knowledge is more important than imagination: Imagine a world

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. Discuss

    of the present and past but not the future, the ?real absolute? truth. History is founded by historians and archeologists are trying to obtain it by discovering scriptures, evidences to support events that happened in the past. They sometimes add their own imagination or assumptions which seems ?humanly? and ?logical? to fill the gaps in missing scriptures.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work