• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Northrop Frye in The motive for metaphor compares science and art. The common element between the two seems to be imagination. In science it becomes the final element and in art the starting point.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The motive for metaphor' Northrop Frye Northrop Frye in 'The motive for metaphor' compares science and art. The common element between the two seems to be imagination. In science it becomes the final element and in art the starting point. In Frye view, a scientist examines the world which we are given to live, scrutinises all the data and attempts at forming certain theories which would underlay the rules governing the world. I doing so, he moves from the known realm, tangible world towards the concepts in his mind, therefore a creation of imagination. ...read more.

Middle

He must make his creation as real as possible, therefore he must employ his intellect which through logical planning captures the emotions and converts them into an ordered world of his. Both a scientist and an artist fall back on intuition and logic in their work. A scientist intuitively undertakes one of the possible streams of his theories and also uses the logic to verify their plausibility. An artist feels what his world should resemble and then with his intellectual resources tries to achieve so. A scientist and an artist differ in respect as in what way they perceive the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

Without the theories and inventions of today, the theories and inventions of tomorrow will not have the opportunity to appear. An average scientist, though not having an excellent mind, has greater knowledge than a genius scientist living two centuries ago. A modern phone is far better than the phone used by Bell's contemporaries. The same cannot be said of art. A masterpiece yet not created will not be better or worse, from already existing ones, it will be just different. A masterpiece once created, becomes a model and a part of a cannon, called classic. No work of art can outdo King Lear for instance, only a new, different jewel of literature can be created. Word count: 468 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    It was a major transition from the aboriginal life, but one thing remained in common - the evident determination in the work the people were doing. The settlers had shown their hard work through the means of farming and settling their homes and families, whereas the aboriginals showed this through hunting and surviving the nature of Canada.

  2. A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    For example, the political differences which have resulted in the creation of two branches of Muslim religion-the Shias and the Sunnis. The shias believe that Ali, the prophet's son in law, should have followed in throne after the prophet Muhammad died.

  1. Pseudo-science or science

    Such theories like these won't be counted as 'scientific' because it's merely a prediction based on theory but not in practical. How can you prove that the occurrence from one mistake can cause a huge problem? How can scientist prove that it can actually happen?

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    aspects which weaken each other when the are cross-bred like in history. The compromise between the objective and subjective forces of history, hence, implies the specific problems of historical conclusions. Admittedly, all knowledge could be regarded as a combination of subjectivity and objectivity, 30 since all information needs to pass our subjective minds to become knowledge.

  1. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    But history involves humans, and the information and facts of history can only with human imagination be 25 interpreted and put into a context. While scientific and artistic knowledge are both strong forms of knowledge, in which the knower has a high degree of confidence about his conclusions, they contain

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    McMullin 2 Next, lets talk about the three types of knowledge this discussion is mainly concerning. There is the knowledge resulting from the scientific method, which strives to be objective and replicable. This knowledge is exposed to high demands of rigour, since to be regarded as knowledge it has to

  1. Tok Art Assignment: My reactions on visiting the Art Gallery

    A102 Portraits of important people, Colonial Society, Canadian Geography Colonial Dark ominous colours, brown and grey are common Oil on Canvas, Watercolour Light M A103 Pioneers, early settlers, interactions with aboriginals Detailed Paintings Passive, not strong nor dark Oil on canvas Accurate and neat M A104 Halifax, Dundas, Niagara Falls

  2. TOK Speech on Art

    you can observes the physical properties of one and the other you cannot. The main point being the fact that if you were given the artists intent for visual art you have something to question and debate as to whether or not you wish to accept it to be genuine.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work