• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Perception Discuss the following quote: We perceive the world the way we see it, not the way it is The Talmud

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Matthieu Robin 25/11/08 11PCL Theory of Knowledge - Tom Williams Perception Discuss the following quote: "We perceive the world the way we see it, not the way it is" The Talmud This quote from The Talmud, (a collection of ancient Jewish laws and tradition for religious and social matters1) may be interpreted into two different ways. In a more literary sense this quote means that human beings see the world through the five senses, but not the way it actually is. The world can also be perceived empirically, through experience. This latter explanation has a deeper significance and extends further in terms of approaches to the external world than the limited five senses. Either way, it would be impossible for humans to perceive the real external world. Humans throughout their lives are conditioned to the belief that the world they live in is a material reality. They grow up under the effect of this influence and their belief on this view point strengthens. ...read more.

Middle

It is an image formed inside our brain. If one sees a flower in a vase in the external world, in reality it is not in the external world but in our brain. As humans we are not in direct contact with the external world and what separate's us from this 'world' is our five senses. The five senses enable the brain to create or interpret an image of the real world. As humans we also perceive the world empirically, which means that we obtain knowledge through our senses. This knowledge is based on experience (observation and experiment), especially the experience of the senses. The knowledge we acquire through experience is the basis of understanding, which is the making of that experience meaningful to us. Empiricism is what separates us, from the physical objective reality. It is a way for the human being to differentiate himself individualistically. It is a perception that enables someone's ability to notice and understand things that are not obvious to other people. ...read more.

Conclusion

It shows that the world can be perceived far beyond objective reality. It proves that empiricism is a boundless way of looking at the external world. The world can be seen in two ways, through our sensory perception, and through the knowledge gained from experience of the senses (empiricism). When the world is seen from the sensory perception, it is quite limited in terms of knowing what the external world is because our brain is not in direct contact with the external world and the brain can only receive knowledge of the external world through the senses. Since every human being is built differently and perceives the world in different ways, the external world is viewed and altered from person to person. This reality is reasonably objective, and through empiricism, it is a matter of experience, and the more experience you get, the more knowledge you acquire. This is a better way of understanding the world 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud 2 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    Cube" by Hans Haacke made from 1963-65, made of acrylic and distilled water. The pieces of so called 'bad' contemporary art to me were not all that bad. I would prefer to classify them as the ones that I least preferred or enjoyed while touring the contemporary room.

  2. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    be for everybody: "He causes the sun to rise on the evil and the good".

  1. TOK speech - Does experience with mathematics influence perception of beauty?

    The numbers are actually players that obey the rules of the "game" per say. Therefore, any form of beauty in the mathematical world is more valid than the perceived beauty in the physical world. V: Now, let's all take a figurative step back and see where all this discussion has taken us.

  2. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time Perception Deception

    Upon discovering something of this sort, most people would not assume that just because the father killed the dog in a fit of rage (without even meaning to murder), it is likely that he will kill them too. Additionally, most people would be angry yet after a while, relieved that the mother is still alive.

  1. Language and Perception

    These two methods work against the personality and value of experiences, and generalize them in many different ways. So what is the result of a generalized experience then? Many times, it is disregarded and ignored. If someone tells a story about how they ran for an hour, nobody is going

  2. Do we perceive the world directly?

    However, direct realists can counteract this argument, saying that naive realism does in fact account for illusions. In this situation, what we see is actually there ? the image of the stick bending is due to refraction. We cannot focus solely on the stick, but must take into account the

  1. Human Brain is no more than a highly complex computer. Discuss

    However, once again, the biggest limitation of Deep Blue was that he could only be better at chess, and nothing else, mainly because it was the only area that he was taught to be good at. Thus, the Deep Blue can solely play chess, and nothing more.

  2. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better it is. Discuss.

    However, the public is usually the final beneficiary of the development of science. And if they have a bias on the falsifiability, then many applications can?t have their impacts. Moreover, actually there are no perfect theories. Limitations are not a shame to see.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work