• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


Kamila Wojciechowicz IB 1 PRINCIPLES ARE VALUABLE ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ARE USEFUL NOT FOR THEMSELVES. DISCUSS. BEFORE DISCUSSING PRINCIPLES WE SHOULD FIRST DEFINE them. We can define principle as a dogma or doctrine, which supports our investigations and thus can be used in practice. It has been invented by humans, who like to put things into order. Xenophanes, Socrates and Plato were the ones who enquired after the meaning of principles and analyzed them thoroughly. However, the Greeks believed that principles have long existed before mankind, since they emerged beyond human reason and have always been a part of the Cosmos. Principles therefore, determine all existing things (the nonliving as well) and play a crucial part in life. Principles can be either regarded as laws such as e.g. The Law of Archimedes, but most of principles are not determined by science. Morality is a set of laws artificially created by men to retain order. However, we have never agreed to obey these laws. I would like to devote this essay to the meaning of morality, for this is the only set of principles that can be discussed upon. ...read more.


It is merely an act of pragmatism, so that the probability of miscarriage decreases. Many say that morality tells us to let the woman sit down, but it can just as well have nothing to do with morality. Why should we care whether the woman will miscarry or not? It is not our business and it does not affect us in the slightest way. On one hand, it might not be our business, but on the other hand it is not pleasant to look at a woman bleeding on the floor and screaming her head off. It is therefore a better solution to resign from the luxury of sitting instead of provoking a situation of potential miscarriage. Hobbes has been greatly intrigued with the meaning of morality and law. According to him, there was no such thing as morality-people used to kill each other like animals, without guilt. However, at some stage they became tired with the constant struggle for survival and decided to maintain a ruler, who will dominate all people and thus prevent them from further fighting. ...read more.


All these common situations that take place in our life evoke certain feelings which can be caused by our morality. Gratitude has no particular use, but if we were to function without it, this would signify that we live in a determined world, where we can neither blame nor show appreciation towards others. Morality helps us in building relationships with people and it is a feature present only in human beings. It is, therefore related to the soul rather than the body. To conclude, it appears that morality is a non substantial feature, present in all humans. Many philosophers tried to explain the reason for morality and even though neither has found a perfectly valid argument for and against morality, it must be somehow present in all of us. Quoting a bluesman: "You can't live with it-you can't live without it."- fully shows what a peculiar thing morality is. Despite this quotation, I believe that morality as a principle of our life is valuable and useful. It may not always seem useful from the practical point of view, but from the perspective of our "soul" or our "Inner Self", it may provide us with peace and positive energy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Are scientific models useful, despite their inaccuracies?

    The purpose of the periodic table (to show an element's weight, structure, etc, relative to other elements) was changed due to inaccuracies (missing elements). If we assess Bohr's model, the space between the electrons and the nucleus is evidently mistaken.

  2. The Solution.

    I was absolutely amazed by the fact that every force had an equal and opposite reaction. I would not fully understand that concept until my 10th grade honors Pre-IB physics I course, but my interests were sparked. I have always enjoyed learning and my pursuit of knowledge has led me

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work