PRINCIPLES ARE VALUABLE ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ARE USEFUL NOT FOR THEMSELVES. DISCUSS.

Authors Avatar

Kamila Wojciechowicz IB 1

PRINCIPLES ARE VALUABLE ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ARE USEFUL NOT FOR THEMSELVES. DISCUSS.

BEFORE DISCUSSING PRINCIPLES WE SHOULD FIRST DEFINE them. We can define principle as a dogma or doctrine, which supports our investigations and thus can be used in practice. It has been invented by humans, who like to put things into order. Xenophanes, Socrates and Plato were the ones who enquired after the meaning of principles and analyzed them thoroughly. However, the Greeks believed that principles have long existed before mankind, since they emerged beyond human reason and have always been a part of the Cosmos.  Principles therefore, determine all existing things (the nonliving as well) and play a crucial part in life. Principles can be either regarded as laws such as e.g. The Law of Archimedes, but most of principles are not determined by science. Morality is a set of laws artificially created by men to retain order. However, we have never agreed to obey these laws.

I would like to devote this essay to the meaning of morality, for this is the only set of principles that can be discussed upon. Morality is a rather general notion, but basically it requires the presence of human kind, whilst other principles can exist independently. The meaning of morality changes constantly, depending on the culture that you were brought up in and history. For instance, in Poland nobody would stand up against a pack of Wszechpolska  Młodzież persecuting an African. If it were happening in the U.S, either these people would go to jail or be beaten up by a black gang. Conformism has the advantages that it does not demand anything from you. Most of Poles are either conformists or cowards, too frightened to even call the police. Morality demands some effort which is why people find it rather uncomfortable. Should we help an elderly lady, even though we gain nothing by doing so? The only person that takes advantage of our deed is the lady, but sooner or later she will forget about the event.  Why should we let a pregnant woman sit down in the bus? Neither of the sides really gains anything. It is merely an act of pragmatism, so that the probability of miscarriage decreases. Many say that morality tells us to let the woman sit down, but it can just as well have nothing to do with morality. Why should we care whether the woman will miscarry or not? It is not our business and it does not affect us in the slightest way.

Join now!

On one hand, it might not be our business, but on the other hand it is not pleasant to look at a woman bleeding on the floor and screaming her head off.  It is therefore a better solution to resign from the luxury of sitting instead of provoking a situation of potential miscarriage. Hobbes has been greatly intrigued with the meaning of morality and law. According to him, there was no such thing as morality-people used to kill each other like animals, without guilt. However, at some stage they became tired with the constant struggle for survival and decided to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay