• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Problems With Interpreting Meaning. What do the problems with interpreting meaning discussed by the keys and the textbook tell us about the nature of language, its capabilities and its limits? Be sure to consider the four theories of meaning (van de Lage

Extracts from this document...


Carter Els Mr. Fum/Theory of Knowledge P.2 Problems with meaning 20 November 2011 Word count: 1402 "What do the problems with interpreting meaning discussed by the keys and the textbook tell us about the nature of language, its capabilities and its limits? Be sure to consider the four theories of meaning (van de Lagemaat 51-55) and the five categories of problematic meaning (55-60). Use specific examples wherever you can. Try to build up a general description of what language can and cannot do, not just a laundry list of theories about language and its problems." The Problems of Interpreting Meaning Language is a thick concept that can be described as a deliberate form of communication that makes use of arbitrary symbols rather than direct expressions of intention ( 1). However, in order for those symbols to be considered language, they must be rule-governed, creative and intended. Since we receive the majority of our knowledge through language, it is crucial to be clear on the meanings of words in order to understand what is being communicated. However, language is susceptible to misinterpretation and misunderstanding. ...read more.


and involve the most remarkable assumptions, even in the case of very simple concepts, such as what counts as a possible thing," (Chomsky 29). With this in mind, these two theories can only be applied to concrete words and cannot relate to more abstract words, such as love and freedom, which can be further understood by the meaning as know-how theory. The image theory assumes that the meaning of a word is the mental image it stands for ( 1). It is constituted on each person having his or her own mental representation of an object or feeling, which is private and customized to each individual experience. Therefore when trying to communicate through language, one can never be sure if the other understands the meaning of a word in the same way (van de Lagemaat 54). For example, when a tourist asks a local for directions, the local's mental image of his own directions is based on his knowledge of the city and his own experience when traveling that city, while the tourist's mental image of those same directions could be distorted and inaccurate causing a miscommunication between them. ...read more.


Language contains both precise words and vague words because they serve different functions that are necessary for communication. Another category of problematic meaning is metaphors. A metaphor is a deliberate extension of a word beyond its normal meaning; buzz words, idioms and clich�s all derive from metaphors. Dead metaphors are phases that were originally metaphors but have become so familiar that people no longer think of them as metaphors, such as 'nightfall' and 'chair leg.' The last category of problematic meaning is irony: saying the opposite of what one truly means. Irony is another example of the versatility and flexibility of language. Language is a thick concept, one whose meaning cannot be exhausted by a simple definition; the arbitrary symbols that language is composed of are considered to be language when they are rule governed, intended and open-ended. Language's many capabilities and limits are elaborated through the four theories of meaning and the five categories of problematic meaning. Overall, language can be vague, precise, extended, inverted and can be a lot more than what one thought. Language is ambiguous, for vagueness, connotation and irony can all fall into the category of ambiguity. Regardless of its limits, language is a necessary part of life, since most of our information is retrieved through this way of knowing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. How Inner nature and survival of the fittest relate to the relationship of mind ...

    However he came out of retirement at the age of 34 and won his comeback debut fight with ease against a rather weak opponent, after the fight he decided it was time to take a shot to fight for the World Title and perhaps regain his position as World champion.

  2. To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language? ...

    Sometimes when people talk they say things which mean the exact thing as it sounds. For example, when someone says "I like your shoes" it means they actually like your shoes, there are no other multiple meanings to that. On the other hand, language can be very ambiguity at times.

  1. TOk Discussion - Do we impose mathematics upon nature or is it naturally inherent ...

    V: But do these qualities apply to all theorems? We know that there are many methods to solve a problem. But is the simplest and most direct solution to a mathematical problem established as the most aesthetically appealing? Perhaps there may be a solution that is longer but demonstrates leaps in logic that are inspirational and elegant?

  2. Language limits what you can think.

    The linguistic realism is a theory that states that language merely influences your thoughts about the real world but does not determine what you think. The main proof that the language does not limit our though are the babies. When we born we are not able to speak but we are able to think and it is scientifically proven.

  1. Language defining difficult, language and translation and language has influenced of geography.

    If we can't get a meaning of the word, our thinking will change and we cannot gain the knowledge from the language. When we translate a word, we need to truth the meaning that we got from the translator. We must believe that the word is true and justified.

  2. United They Stand, Divided They Fall

    Its accuracy allows us to extrapolate more general laws using the deduced law given its accuracy. Historical explanations may not allow such freedom in extrapolation, but the formation and purpose of one is quite similar to that of a scientific explanation, despite the rather widely held opinion is that in

  1. The Language Instinct - theories of Pinker and Chomsky

    Pinker uses the phrase structure rules and diagrams to support his claim. He demonstrates how limiting the traditional grammatical categories are; he even describes verbs as little despots. Pinker also offers that ?grammar offers a clear refutation of the empiricist doctrine that there is nothing in the mind that was

  2. Which of the three Theories of Meaning is most useful in distinguishing meaningful words ...

    Dictionaries help point us in the right direction, but they do not give us the precise meaning of a word. The denotation theory says that what distinguishes a meaningful word from a meaningless one is that the former stands for something while the latter does not, and that meanings are found in the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work