• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Pseudo-science or science

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The existence of Pseudo-Science suggests that the very basis of Science itself is flawed.' How far do you agree with this statement? People often believe Science as it is because it is said to be 'Scientifically Proven'. But how do we know if it really is true? What about Pseudo-Science? Pseudo-Science is a claim or belief which is presented to be scientific but lack of supporting evidence for it to be proven, rather it is more of a belief, yet some people still choose those over real Science. Pseudo-Science also has its relations with the Religion. Why? Because Science cannot prove that all that is said in Religions are true or not since it's not part of understanding the nature of science, it is a belief. The claim that it is grounded in observation is supposed to be what distinguishes genuine science from pseudo-science. But the traditional picture of the scientific method consists of observation, hypothesis, experiment, law and theory. Where as pseudo-science don't need all those key steps to make a statement about something because it is a belief and not to be proven. ...read more.

Middle

Another example would be the process of Reincarnation, which comes from the belief of the Hinduism. Ian Stevenson, a scientist, found that the vast majority of cases investigated with explained personal traits involved people who had met some sort of violent or untimely death. Stevenson also provided evidence that it is true. But if we include the basis of Pseudo-science in this evidence, how much of it do we know is true? Science is only based on evidence that can be scientifically proven, whereas in this case Reincarnation involves the moving of souls from one body to another, from one generation to another; and Science by far could not even prove that the souls even exist or not. Thus Reincarnation could not be science even though some scientist proves that it is with their evidence. As I have mentioned above about the different theories there are to identify the differences, let us now take an example from the Theory of Chaos, such as the 'Butterfly Effect', which basically shows that from such a tiny mistake occurring can cause a huge problem not only for one person but for many others around them as well; chaos also imply that there is no order. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even if it were to work or not, no scientist can prove whether crystals has its own power within it to help cure pains on parts of the human body. Just like the use of Acupuncture, but in different ways. It also used to generate a field of positive crystalline energy depending on which crystals gives out which type of energy fields. This kind of magic pendant although it cannot be proven has been believed and stated that it is scientific due to its unexplained capability. As I have mentioned above, science needs its key steps to prove whether or not the relevant data scientists collected can be concluded to develop a theory and unifies various laws in terms of some underlying principal. But we don't surely know whether the new discovered scientific laws are correct or not, now do we? If we connect it with pseudo-science, people's belief and real science collide with each other in various ways. But pseudo-science helps and motivates scientists to find out more about how it works. Through many of the examples I have described above, have made some points from my own perspective that science itself is flawed due to the existence of pseudo-science, but whether it is completely true we don't know, and that it is, and will forever be incomplete. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. The Provisional Nature of Science

    This theory was soon disproved by many scientists such as Bohr and Rutherford. Today, we have a much different prediction of what the atom looks like thanks to quantum mechanics. With science we accept our limitations that we have with today's instruments, and we look at what we can potentially do with them.

  2. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    This had led, quite recently, to the development of a kind of 'protest theodicy': an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm God's omnipotent and omnibenevolent in the face of the existence of evil. An example of protest theodicy is God's apparent failure to act during the Holocaust seems to suggest he is not all loving.

  1. The Law of the Universe: Entropy

    illustrative demonstration of the fact that different disciplines are really only descriptions of reality at different levels and thus if we assume that there is one uniting principle at the heart of all processes in the universe then in a strange fractal kind of way we should have one law

  2. supernatural science

    They have become more serious and they are traumatized by life. Science and technology is changing faster than ever before, thus mankind is at its apex. But science still has not proved the existence of God. People argue that God has been created by man to help control and govern the masses.

  1. TOK IB IA presentation. On what basis do spiritual beliefs rest? I have ...

    Ian Stevenson's colleague Dr. Jim Tucker who has furthered Stevenson's research by looking at the memories in many young children all over the world. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZTtU7akrfQ Boy 1: All this looks interesting but there is chance that a big chunk of these 3000 cases just might be frauds or cases where children are lying etc.

  2. Dianetics - a science or pseudoscience?

    There are considerable clues that indicate that Dianetics is not a science. For example, Hubbard's a priori idea that a science's aim is to find a single source to all mental ills appears to be a convenient postulation, not being a confirmed fact and neglecting all knowledge accumulated by humanity up to today.

  1. A Discussion of the Understanding of Religion In the Lights of Relativity and Interpretation

    Some spirits are helpful to humans, or at least benign, but most are evil and harmful. Usually they are considered to be less powerful than true gods. In Christianity, the Devil is served by evil spirits called demons. Originally these were angels, but they were turned into demons after they assisted Satan in his revolt against God.

  2. What are good reasons and bad reasons for funding scientific research ? Refer ...

    Of course we can all agree that theoretically public domains are supposed to be the most appropriate funders, because they are supposed to provide information useful and available to everyone in the world (the public). For example they concentrate research on important fundamental factors which mainly concern health, trying to find new remedies to cure illnesses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work