• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real and what we are told is true.

Extracts from this document...


"Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real and what we are told is true." by Nicola Montague-Patel Firstly, what is science? There are numerous possible answers to that, one of which could be ?Is it to question, observe, and hypothesize about what we see or at least think we can see?? Over the millennia scientists have used tools and instruments to observe, conduct experiments, to record data from those experiments and to draw logical conclusions be they practical (i.e. visible) or purely hypothetical. Often in order to conduct scientific study in a new area scientists also needed to invent the very tools and instruments needed to perform the experiments. In all instances we know that conducting single experiments in isolation will not provide enough data to prove or disprove any theory. Scientist?s always seek to build a viable case; this process can often involve many years of striving to collect further experimental evidence and proof for their theories. There is a repetitive element to scientific experimentation due to inherent uncertainties, especially if the area of study is new. In the world of science proving a scientific theory is just as important as perhaps disproving the theory. In many cases scientific theories are frequently proved or disproved many years after the original proposals were made and all too frequently many years after the demise of the proposer. ...read more.


Plato with his ideas that every object is working towards the perfect mathematical form (perhaps he had conceived an early draft of the Grand Unified Theory?) Jumping forwards to the current millennium, in the world of high-energy particle physics, as recently as this year (2013) scientists have used vast man made devices to all but prove the existence of one of the fundamental building blocks of the universe. A particular type particle first envisaged by Professor Peter Higgs (amongst others) back in the previous century has needed 50 plus years of slow methodical observation and invention of larger and larger particle accelerators culminating in the building at huge expense of the large Hadron Collider at Cern in Switzerland, along with huge instruments to detect the smallest traces of proof that the Higgs boson actually existed for a few milliseconds before decaying almost as rapidly it was created. In this instance an enormous amount of effort and money has been expended throughout the scientific community over the last 50 years in the search for this elusive particle; it should be noted that the search could easily have ended with the conclusion that the particle did not exist or possibly that we did not have the means to detect it. In either case the scientists involved in the search had enough belief in the theory to pursue the cause relentlessly for many decades. ...read more.


Many a dictatorship of a secular state has used the some basic principles of restricting information and freedom of thought to control the populous for their benefit. As a counterpoint to the long held version of the ?truth?, science is readily providing convincing evidence to the contrary; almost always by the basic principles of ?questioning, observing, and hypothesizing about what we see or at least think we can see?. Certain groups and individuals are defending their beliefs using the notion of ?intelligent design? the idea that this universe that we know cannot have come about randomly in amongst many others and therefore we must be part of a bigger picture in which control is being exorcised by someone or something with a purpose, although obviously we don?t know what that purpose is of course. The openly anti-religious attitudes and ideas of prominent thinkers of our generation such as Professor Richard Dawkins should be leading the majority of the world?s independent people to the conclusion that ?no? we can?t tell the difference between the real and the unreal or that we should always believe what we are told. We must therefore have the right to question everything and we have the freedom of thought that has allowed us come to our own conclusions, be they right or wrong; that surely is the object of science and the tool that it has provided to us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. How can different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is ...

    Also there are relationship between religions and reason. Several religions can give some religious reasons to believe things around you and not allow you to search for the truth. In contrast, empiricism looks only to explain what is able to be observed, and applies those observations to a certain set of rules which mean that we based our

  2. If facts themselves never prove or disprove anything, what else is involved in the ...

    This is an important point, and one that distinguishes fact from knowledge. Facts do not require proof or even evidence or justification, they do not even need us to believe in them; they just are. Knowledge, at least knowledge of a propositional nature, requires us to satisfy the criteria of justified, true belief (Abel, 1976).

  1. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    In such a scenario we see that the view of the absolute changes from person to person. Moreover this implies that each opinion is valid and there is no correct view that shares universal commonalities in belief. Impractical, as it is to carve out all our knowledge systems by ourselves,

  2. The Law of the Universe: Entropy

    illustrative demonstration of the fact that different disciplines are really only descriptions of reality at different levels and thus if we assume that there is one uniting principle at the heart of all processes in the universe then in a strange fractal kind of way we should have one law

  1. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    Consequently, what we believe as being true is modeled by inductive reasoning. It is increasingly common for us to rely on inductive reasoning when experimentation on that particular subject is not viable. In the first trimester, as part of my assignment in physics, I was to make a brief presentation in class about the 'chaos theory' (butterfly effect).

  2. How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that ...

    know as a chemistry student that the test for hydrogen will always be a ?squeaky pop sound?, this is because I have tested this myself and I heard the sound a made.

  1. TOK Socrates Summary of Euthyphro, The Apology, and Crito. Applying This To ...

    Many revolve on how it will look bad on his friends because people will think they did nothing to save him. He also explains that if he stays, he will aid his enemies in wronging him unjustly making him unjust himself.

  2. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    From the human comparitier level, the ramdom variation of each of these genes and their unique combinatory permutaions, creates no two individuals alike. This scientific genetic determinim seems to be at the core of what one really is. Inductive and deductive reasoning have placed ?Homo Homo Sapiens? at the forefront of evolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work