• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should we trust science to give us a complete understanding of the world?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should we trust science to give us a complete understanding of the world? Being aware of the fact that in our society anything that is scientifically proven to be true is more likely to be believed than for example any spiritual ideas, might give a sufficient estimate of how important science has become in everyday life. But what does the term 'scientifically proven' actually represent? Is anything investigated by a group of men, so-called scientists, and eventually found to be 'true', definite truth? Analysing this question, one should ask oneself when science started to increase in its importance in our society, nowadays almost replacing traditional religions. Will there ever be the situation in which all old religions will die out, and science will take over their place and be worshipped? Will science, given enough time and effort, be able to answer all human questions, as Emile Durkheim predicted? ...read more.

Middle

If hypothesis proved to be true, result was achieved. 2) If hypothesis was incorrect, the experiment failed. Step 6: Possible further steps if failure: - what was wrong with hypothesis? - was a poor selection made? - was experiment flawed? - forming new hypothesis, based on additional research. - testing new hypothesis. The table shows the use of the scientific method in the first of its three possible ways by performing experiments and critically observing the results, a solution was achieved. Already in 130 CE, the Greek physician Galen used this method when dissecting animals to find out about muscle structure. Carl Hempel argued that science was based on what he called hypthetico-deductive reasoning. By this expression he meant the importance of formulating hypothetical laws on observations, which can be used as a premise in a deductive argument such as: The scientific method demands certainty Inductive logic can never be certain Therefore the scientific method cannot use inductive logic. ...read more.

Conclusion

He concludes that people such as Popper, Hempel and others have not described the real methodology of science but fictional states of affairs. In my conclusion I want to mention the philosopher Paul Feyerabend, who stated that science has anarchistic features, and can therefore not be estimated in any way by observation of experiments and concluding hypotheses, as the same problem might have a completely different solution the next time it was stated. Therefore he argues, as already Popper had suggested, that theories are not so much constructed on the basis of observation and careful experiment, but have their basis in (irrational) conjecture, speculations and moments of inspiration. This might create a mental relation between artists and scientists. Therefore science can be seen as a means to promote one's ability to understand his surrounding, but only when taking into account the possible distortion which might be caused by such a restricted approach. Frank Pillukeit No 8 04.05.2007 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. The Provisional Nature of Science

    know we can't reach perfection; however, today we get close to those ideal situations. We are about a billionth of a degree away from the zero Kelvin mark. Science is so heavily funded for the reason that it advances our society.

  2. Free essay

    When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    can be untrue as emotion and reason are used to interpret according to experience. This experience might not apply to the situation or make it unjustifiable resulting ultimately in the lack of truth. Then again, this situation would lead to every human having no access to the truth which is not the case.

  1. Vemos las cosas tal y como son, o tal y como somos

    Es dif�cil para cualquier persona ser objetivo cuando el tema toca las creencias personales del autor, que generalmente trata de modificar u omitir cierta informaci�n inc�moda, quiz�s para convencerse a si mismo de que esas verdades no son as�. Respecto al �mbito de lo cient�fico, se pueden aplicar algunas propiedades parecidas a las que fueron descritas en el primer argumento.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    Human science is the area where we are seeking to know meaning- related realities1 that are not bound to specific time and places. When performing scientific experiments it is given that you will use and trust your senses to give you the right answer.

  1. Neither Art nor Science can give us a complete knowledge of the world. Discuss.

    Those 'requirements of knowledge' leads us on to a very important sub-question, does truth exist, and if so, is it possible to identify it? It might very well be that there is something 'out there' that is absolutely universally true beyond doubt, I have no reason to proclaim otherwise, but

  2. Defining and Analyzing Mixed Method Johnson and Christensen (2007) describe mixed research as the ...

    To aid in the efforts of effective leadership, researchers may need to alter the methodology used for leadership studies organizational requirements in the 21st century will differ from requirements faced by businesses today. Consequently, research methods used to study the realm of leadership has been based upon the paradigm of how aspects should be managed.

  1. As an IB student, how has your learning of history and science ...

    But is it really always so? Are not there incidents that throw light on Man?s progress? Yes there are. And to know them it is literature again that paves the way. Reading the Elizabethan age, we realize that England was ruled by a woman, Queen Elizabeth.

  2. As an IB student, how has your learning of literature and science contributed to ...

    Through literature we can know what it is to live in poverty, and how it feels when one falls in love. Literature tells us that sometimes an individual does not change with the changing times. We have many societies in the world, where racism, caste and creed are still the order of the day.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work