• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Some scientific theories relate to physical objects e.g. atoms or bacteria. Others are concepts, such as 'heat' or 'force'. We cannot 'point to' physical examples of these concepts, as we can with atoms or bacteria. How do we know they are real?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Some scientific theories relate to physical objects e.g. atoms or bacteria. Others are concepts, such as 'heat' or 'force'. We cannot 'point to' physical examples of these concepts, as we can with atoms or bacteria. How do we know they are real? The essential question that first comes to mind is not if a concept can be shown to be real but instead, how do we know what is real and what is not, and thus, how do we define real? It is my belief that reality, the quality of being real, is an extension of truth, thus, begging the question of what is true. For the purposes of this essay let us take truth to be the wide consensus of society as a whole with regard to morality, the law and religion. ...read more.

Middle

Thus, God, an intangible being, one that no living person has evidence of seeing, despite many claims of visions, is real and true yet not a physical object. This same argument can be applied to scientific theories, supporting my belief that theories do not need to relate to physical objects in order to be real, as in general, truth and reality arise from the intangible as well. On the other hand, how can we truly know that scientific theories are real as many such theories have been disproved to date? For example, Newton's laws of motion were shown to be real only at the scale in which humans lived and the earth existed. However, Einstein and the theory of relativity later proved that these laws would be inapplicable when placed in regard to different scales. ...read more.

Conclusion

Secondly, how can we know that what is true at our scale applies to other scales relative to ours? What this implies is that even if a scientific theory is taken to be accurate and applicable beyond doubt, has the theory of relativity made it uncertain as to whether this theory has taken into account all scales and relatives, thus rendering it a truth and real? Therefore, in conclusion, I believe it is this doubt that forces us to view all scientific theories sceptically, not just ones with regard to physical objects as even those are fallible and it is my personal view that scientific theories that have been accepted by society, after the examination of a scientific board, are real, regardless of their regard to the tangible or intangible. ?? ?? ?? ?? Magdalene Chan Theory of Knowledge Science Lesson #4 Homework Assignment ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is Gentleman? What are the characteristics of the Gentleman? Is it possible to ...

    "Is it possible to be the Gentleman?" Nowadays this question has two answers: "yes" and "no". First answer leads to theoretical approach but second one leads to practical approach. Theoretically it is possible to achieve Gentleman's qualities and it is to say that I am the Gentleman.

  2. Are scientific models useful, despite their inaccuracies?

    one, as the economy is always changing due to money supply, government expenditure and global interest rate.

  1. Can a machine know?

    Furthermore, he argues that his lack of understanding goes to show that computers do not understand Chinese either, because they are in the same situation as he is. They are mindless "manipulators of symbols"4, just as he is, and they do not understand what they are 'saying', just as he does not.

  2. Is Santa Real

    Next, Santa would have to give up his jovial, innocuous ego and mutate normal reindeer into strong, flying animals that would somehow carry 321,300 tons of presents (assuming that each child gets 2 pounds worth of presents). Since the average normal reindeer can carry no more than 300 pounds, these

  1. How Inner nature and survival of the fittest relate to the relationship of mind ...

    prepare for one fight where as in other sports; athletes and teams train constantly but also participate in official contests weekly and even nightly in some cases such as football, baseball, basketball, etc, but not boxing. After nearly half of one full year of training and preparing everyday for hours, the fighters met in the ring.

  2. Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between ...

    We cannot answer this question because we do not have any evidence that supports nor refutes it. M1: Explain how science can address some of these but not others, using examples of questions science can currently answer, question science cannot answer yet, and question science will never be able to answer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work