• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tell the Truth

Extracts from this document...


" A picture is worth a thousand words." Many people use this quote, but is it true? Can you really get more out of a picture than a 1000 word piece of literature? Can a picture "tell the truth" better than literate or literature "tell the truth" better than a picture or work of art? What area of knowledge can "tell the truth" the best? Knowledge gained by literature and art is gained through emotion. The difference lies with the fact that knowledge gained by literature is also gained through language, where as that gained by art is gained through empiricism. Also, both literature and art are subjunctive to the knower, so the knowledge one person gains from a piece or literature or work or art may be different then that gained by another person who reads or sees the same thing. The truth told by these two forms of knowledge are going to be based on personal perspective. So, doesn't that mean that both art and literature do not tell the truth, but rather evoke a truth because of their subjectivity? ...read more.


Can you explain things better with words than painting, sculptures or music? I feel that it depends on what it is. The truth of true love for example may be told better with a McMullin 3 picture of the two together. Pictures often call on your emotions and let you see for yourself how the two are together. It is often harder to describe things such as true love with words. Other things however are much better explained in a long piece of literature. Therefore, it may depend on what truth you are trying to tell? Perhaps one might think of the different areas of knowledge as different musical instruments. They can all play or tell the same note, for example C sharp, but, they do it in different ways. Does it sound better on one instrument or the other? I believe not! We also have to take into consideration the question of can truth (or even just "significance") be better realised through your own words or those of someone else? Because with literature you are leaning the truth through the words of others, where with a work of art you are using your own words to describe the truth you are learning. ...read more.


The learning process depends on agreement, and this agreement rests on pure reason. If you agree with the general concepts, it is the most simple of all the areas of knowledge, there is only one correct answer, 2 + 2 will always equal 4. Math is a universal language, with nothing lost in translation. It "tells the truth in the most simple and straightforward McMullin 5 way. Can literature or art ever "tell the truth" better than math? In conclusion, I do not believe that literature can not "tell the truth" better than other Arts or Areas of Knowledge. I believe that because of their subjective nature literature and art are less likely to reach the truth than the other areas of knowledge. I believe that the best ways to " tell the truth" are through sciences and math. There is less to no room for interpretation or personal opinion. On the other hand everyone finds the truth in different places. Some find it in math calculations, some in music, some in visual arts, and others in natural sciences. We're all different, and for many literature doesn't quite provide what they're looking for. For many more, however, it does. Therefore, this question comes down to a matter of personal opinion. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Truth.People think that truth is relative because they could look at others points of ...

    The world encountered many changes bit by bit, it has been a time of change and improvement, a time of

  2. Difference of Truth and knowldge

    However, one could also argue that the statement "It is certain" can be used in certain circumstances, such as if there is a law or rule against a certain action, then said action is wrong as it breaks the rule.

  1. Context is all. Does this mean that there is no thing as the truth?

    for example in certain moral codes, which are universal, such as do unto others as you would have them do unto you. The fact that some moral values such as this are implemented in most societies could be considered proof of an absolute moral truth.

  2. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    in fact I could say on the basis of what I have been taught that the USSR under Stalin was not a nice place to live in. But does that mean that it is true? It has come to my understanding that the history of that time period is taught quite differently in Russia, even today.

  1. The Meaning of Truth

    Many people believe that science is the best route, if not the only route, to truth about the natural world. Other people, including many scientists, believe that scientific knowledge may not be perfectly true, but it is closer to the truth than other sources of knowledge and beliefs.

  2. For it is in the long run that, somehow, Truth may Survive-through the Decay ...

    This is because there is so much research and tests that go into determining whether something is true or not in science. When there is an instance in which something does not acquiesce an answer, then people go to science for an explanation.

  1. Tok vocabularies - defining terms like "Truth" and "Belief"

    For example, when I want to say that UFOs exist, I should provide positive evidence such as photography or a video. There should also be evidence to prove that the photo and the video are not manipulated. By saying that there is no evidence to prove that UFOs don?t exist does not make the fact that UFOs exist true.

  2. Tok Art Assignment: My reactions on visiting the Art Gallery

    It boasts gothic-style architecture which resembles old universities in England such as Oxford. Frank Clair stadium is a building I would not consider art. Its design is very bland and almost resembles a strangely shaped concrete box. Its exterior does little to attract people passing by with little or no emotion inspired in them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work