• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.(Christopher Hitchens) Do you Agree?

Extracts from this document...


Adam McSweeney Per. 7 10/17/12 000315 W.C.1,519 ?That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.?(Christopher Hitchens) Do you Agree? To understand the statement ?That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence?, one must first consider the assumptions made by Christopher Hitchens. Should all assertions made without evidence be dismissed immediately and without any further consideration? While seemingly straightforward, we tend to take the meaning of ?evidence? for granted. Upon careful consideration, we are able to realize that while evidence is indeed much more subjective. This uncertainty over what constitutes ?evidence? is almost a prerequisite to determining which particular assertions can be dismissed, and indeed which particular assertions should be dismissed. While evidence can be accepted as being any particular event or phenomenon that indicates a particular conclusion, evidence becomes subjective depending on particular context. For me, I am much more willing to accept evidence that is well argued, even if it is not necessarily true. As new theories are put forward, their acceptance is largely contingent upon the quality of evidence. However, the use of evidence as the litmus test for theories validity is not entirely accurate, as many theories one thought to be incorrect have been proven, and vice versa. Thus, while I agree with Christopher Hitchens insofar as while evidence certainly makes the dismissal of unsubstantiated theories and ideas possible, the subjectivity of evidence means that these ?unsubstantiated assertions? are not always incorrect, and the assumption that unsubstantiated need to be dismissed is fundamentally flawed. ...read more.


Because many were so quick to condemn the ruling, few actually took the time to investigate the trial itself, and so there was very little evidence that actually proved the men innocent. Relying instead on a more visceral reaction, the pardoning of the men was ultimately grounded in little more than guilt over police brutality related to the incident. However, careful examination of all mainstream accounts of the trial say the trial dragged on for 6 weeks, with the prosecution introducing absolutely no evidence. The trial itself was a fairly black and white issue, so why did it take court 6 weeks to convict the defendants? Further examination of this oddity by Professor Timothy Messer-Kruse yielded the actual transcripts of the trial, which indicated that the prosecution team did indeed have substantial evidence against the defendants. However, within 5 minutes of being published on Wikipedia, the revisions were taken down, with the editors citing a ?lack of verifiability?. In this case, despite the fact that both sides had ?evidence? supporting their beliefs, the acceptance of the more mainstream view goes to show the subjectivity of evidence. While Professor Messer-Kruse cited some of the only first-hand evidence available, Wikipedia refused to acknowledge his findings because they did not to conform to the evidence cited by every other primary source on the topic. The irony of this is the fact that all of the primary sources cite a lack of evidence as the only evidence necessary to pardon the defendants. ...read more.


Yet to the critics who praise Gaudi, my ?evidence? is only superficial, and ignores much of the religious significance of his work[4]. None the less, in such a subjective subject as art, it is virtually impossible to actually determine how to evaluate evidence. Because our perception of art is based on context, our evidence becomes opinions supported by a handful of subjective reasons. As a result, should my opinions on art be disregarded by a renowned art critic whose assertions are no better supported than mine? Because evidence can vary from situation to situation depending on context, dismissing evidence, or a lack of thereof, is infinitely subjective. What might be a well-supported claim backed by evidence to us might simply be nonsense to someone else with a different view point. Thus, I disagree with the assumption that all unwarranted assertions must be disregarded because determining the difference between an assertion and evidence is purely subjective. In the most literal sense of his words, Christopher Hitchens was correct in saying that ?that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence?. However, upon closer examination of not only the author?s intent behind the quote, as well as the inherent subjectivity behind the term ?evidence?, I ultimately disagree with Christopher Hitchens. While Hitchens was literally speaking of rejecting organized religion, the assumptions posited by the author?s social viewpoints are fundamentally flawed and serve to enlarge the potency of his thoughts. The inherent difference between what ?can be done? and what ?should be done? ultimately make Hitchens? position incorrect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    Write down the title and the artist. Research the piece at the library or on the internet, or speak to an art expert to understand the artist and the intended message. The piece of art work which puzzles me at best is called, "Lever", by Carl Andre, made in 1966.

  2. Imagine a world without colours

    The colors were stolen by the evil witch living in Misery Cave. For the next twelve months, citizens of Jubilee Kingdom have to live without color until the evil curse was broken. Everyone including the King found it difficult to adjust. They were no longer able to see after sunset.

  1. ToK presentation

    For example one of the key tools of a dictator, or a similar state, is to use media to indoctrinate the public onto their side. Schoolbooks were given an anti-Jewish spin under Goebbels' propaganda campaign. Radio stations played Hitler's speeches over and over again; books that argued with any of

  2. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence ...

    While evidence can be used to show existence of paradigms, it cannot prove them - they must be shown as true using already established rules and deductive logic (the process of taking already established ideas and building upon them). In the case of Fermat's last theorem, numerical evidence was given

  1. One definition of Knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence ...

    Hence, you need to have some form of sense experience to accept or believe in something proven by science.

  2. Tok Art Assignment: My reactions on visiting the Art Gallery

    to trust the judgment of those in higher authority in areas which I am not an expert myself. 1. Viewing the same piece of work online did not garner the same feeling as viewing it in person. My reaction to Brillo Soap Pads Boxes by Andy Warhol online seemed much less significant than seeing it in the gallery.

  1. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    Notwithstanding this fact knowers continue to perceive that memory will hold them in good stead. This is perhaps due to the fact that subjective concepts like memory are viewed and assessed with emotion and perception ?A wise man,? wrote Hume, ?proportions his belief to the evidence.? [2] This formulates the

  2. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    Hence, it is wise to say that any scientific theories which provide no sensible evidence are merely an assumption. However, as we go through the timeline of scientific discoveries, not all established theories have been able to provide us with explanations and evidence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work