• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The human sciences are sometimes conceived as aiming not only to explain human behaviour or action (from the outside) but also to understand it (from the inside). From this perspective, can the human sciences be said to have a

Extracts from this document...


Cindy Tran Thai Bao Khanh 2) The human sciences are sometimes conceived as aiming not only to explain human behaviour or action ("from the outside") but also to understand it ("from the inside"). From this perspective, can the human sciences be said to have a richness that the natural sciences lack, in terms of ways of knowing and access to different forms of justification? The study of two sciences of nature and humanities is most influential to our modern life. A common factor between the two sciences is that they are both scientific knowledge based on logical and reasonable approaches to verify our observation upon sciences. We all know that natural science is the study of the nature and the universe, which include the explorations into the laws of the origins using scientific method. The knowledge that we gain is used to make precise predictions or explain nature. Human beings have been applying the same method into the study and interpretation of ones' behaviours, experiences, and many other human factors. However, humans are unpredictable; the usage of scientific methods is not considered to give a full explanation why a human behaves consciously in any certain way. ...read more.


end of our friendship, eventually, when we were calm enough to sit down and talk, we realized that there was misunderstanding due to the way that we spoke as the language that we used was insulting. If I applied the scientific methodology into my friend's behaviour, I could explain that he was mad and angry due to the annoyance of my action, everyone is different, and people could not always agree with each other in every action, therefore, when I thought positively about my action, my best friend was mad. However, I could neither give any prediction nor hypothesis for the future if I did not understand him well, and I could never knew what was going to happen, since all of our reaction was unpredictable and based upon our own feelings and emotions. Moreover, we cannot apply one's reaction to another to find out a solution to the problem if we did not understand each other so well. In addition to the richness of human science, emotions play an important part in our judgement system. People can give out horrible judgement and have negative impression about someone just by looking at them, but we do understand that it was our emotion that sharpens the idea. ...read more.


Besides that, they can make up hypothesis relied the scientific methodology, and subsequently carry out experiment testing to ensure their information and use it as a benefit, contributing to our life. The richness of nature sciences is the exploration of the nature physically, chemically and biologically. Do consider that beliefs and interests of human scientists might have impact and influence on their assumption and conclusion in certain fields like human sciences but not natural sciences as they are always clear on what is wrong and right. In conclusion, from the way of classifying the two sciences, we can tell that there would probably be differences. We can argue that human sciences have the richness that the natural sciences lack, or vice versa, but to me, both are correct, just one is a little truer than the other. 'Human sciences' is an interesting subject to me. Even though it is a study of human behaviours and is studied and researched in university, I still believe we can learn it by ourselves through experiences; having someone to understand you is one of the most precious appreciations in life. Human beings are emotional, and a field for an everlasting-exploration, while natural sciences have their own richness as the invention and discovery of everything in the universals. Word Count: 1213 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    The researcher and the scientific community can obtain ample and coherent evidence by repeating procedures and reproducing results. This makes theories convincing. Theories in the natural sciences are considered convincing because the formulation of these theories is derived from mathematical equations.

  2. 12 Angry Men

    Another way of knowing is through reasoning. Reasoning seems to be more reliable than the other Ways of Knowing, because it is based on Rationalism and logic. The only disadvantage is that people are generally not good at abstract reasoning to they often make errors.

  1. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    These research methods are if considered valid, centred on a factual claim. The factual claim is what separates psychology the most from novels. During my replication of a psychological experiment on the effect of word positioning in a series and first impressions, the only thing that I learned of human

  2. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    brain interpretates the observations for us.Observation need use of equipments which sometimes may complicate all the process. * Hypothesis follows a deductive to inductive logical process which means general to specific.Th weaknesses of this process is what stands between truth and validity.Hypothesis may be untrue but valid in the same time: Cactuces need lots of water to survive and grow.

  1. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    In other words, our lethargy encourages us to dismiss the subtlety of art?s purpose. Carlos Cruz-Diez?s Chromosaturations exhibits 22 cubicles of different light and color, ultimately providing a ?phenomenal? color stimulus to the retina. Though the colors were visually appealing, I decided it was just a scientific presentation of light?s

  2. Human sciences - the language of questionnaires

    Verb mean of speed estimated (mph) Smashed 40.8 Collided 39.3 Bumped 38.1 Hit 34.0 Contacted 31.8 A similar procedure was used in which 150 students were chosen to participate. They saw a one-minute film which contained a scene in which several cars were involved in an accident.

  1. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    The book states that ?Scientists have unearthed thousands of fossil specimens representing members of the human family?(4). In the world we live in, people are becoming more open minded and accepting of different views including the concept of evolution. Research showing strong evidence in favour of evolution has resulted in popular belief.

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes ...

    by many variables that cannot be independently controlled by experiment and the environment they are trying to describe is continually changing?[1], which claims experiments unfeasible and unconvincing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work