The progression of knowledge in the area of science relies on scientists' utilization of a process called the scientific method.
The progression of knowledge in the area of science relies on scientists’ utilization of a process called the scientific method. Cause and effect relationships of the variables used in the experiments exist as an essential and imperative attribute to the meaning of this method. Secondly, inductive reasoning helps further the essence and main idea of the method. Thirdly, the gaining of scientific knowledge primarily with the least amount of bias and prejudice possible explains an important purpose of the method. The three essential aspects of the scientific method, which exist as cause and effect relationships of the variables used in experimentation, inductive reasoning, and the attaining of knowledge based upon the least amount of bias and prejudice, all contain a balance of strengths and weaknesses which distinguish precisely the meaning of the scientific method.
The variables of scientific experiments connect through cause and effect relationships, which are based upon the deductive method. The deductive form of the scientific method can be described as an outdated method in which has been prevailed by the inductive method. All events result as a collection of other earlier events. Incidents such as split-second occurrences exemplify this lament. For example, the events before explosions of fireworks or the twisting of leaves are the actual causes and the split second occurrences are the effects. The same group of causes enables scientist to produce predictable events, which are known as hypotheses. In contrast, the method also involves comparisons of situations that have been switched around to one controlled variable. For example, if one researched what habitat a particular animal prefers, he or she would manipulate variables within the habitat to see how it affects the population perhaps the abundance of food available. Cause and effect relations also provide a better understanding of the phenomena that is being examined. All aspects of the science world have something to do with a cause and effect relations. For example, a scientist may have a question in his or her experiment of why the ocean has a tide of movement in and out of a shore and what affect does the moon have in this? A relation exists because the moon’s gravitational pull has an effect on the tides. However, the problem of scientific knowledge of cause and effect relations shows as the inability to be applied to all scientific experiments. For example, the of theory of the universe being formed from a minute ball of energy which exploded with a big bang and ejected billions upon billions of atoms of hydrogen throughout the cosmos supports this. The same atoms created molecules of dust, planets, and galaxies. The effect is the tiny point of energy which is basically a point of high temperature and compressed mass. Scientists cannot scientifically trace back before this point or explain the nature of it because of the lingering effect and no case. Cause and effect relationships of science express a weakness because deduction defines the logic used, which is somewhat inconvenience to the scientific world. Although the strengths of cause and effect relationships, for example, the better understanding of the phenomena in each experiment, cannot be forgotten either.
