• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

the question then leads us to when should trust our senses to give us absolute truth.

Extracts from this document...


In every individual there is an innate ability to sense things. These senses could be just a perception, an experience, and a thought made by an individual. At the subatomic level, everything is connected to each other- the tree to the human being, the human being to the rock, the rock to the fruit, the fruit to the air. In the field of science, atoms are frequently explained with the empty space contained in them. Thus, these atoms exist in every individual and the Earth as a whole, connecting humans with the world by energy. Thus, if we are all connected, our senses are the only way that help us come out of our individual shells and connect to the external forces around us. Thus, the question then leads us to when should trust our senses to give us absolute truth. The journey to find this "truth" has been toiled by man since the earliest of times, and still, man continues to discover the answer. For our senses to guide us in the right direction, we have to train them and govern them with our intellect. Thereafter, imagination, emotion, logic has to balance out to give a perfect equilibrium to our senses. If our emotion is given preference over the senses, there may be room for inaccurate perceptions, as they are not tangible. ...read more.


Thus, because the painting was done with Van Gogh's senses of seeing the chair, today it is recognized by many as a masterpiece, and for people to recognize the sensual effects of the chair, they too have senses to interpret and savor art. To fully come to a conclusion, it is important to understand what our senses are and what they are based on. The five senses are based on perception through touching, seeing, hearing, tasting and smelling. These five senses aid in deductive and inductive reasoning, helping in perceive unrelated things. For example, in animate objects such as a table or a book, is made "real" by our sense of seeing and feeling it. To verify its "reality" we can perhaps even smell it, listen to it fall or bang on something, and taste it. Thus, the senses rationalize the truth with the reality of the object, made "true" by our senses. However, can relying upon the senses give us truth, always? To trust in the senses is the standard approach most individuals take. Webster's Dictionary defines trust as a "reliance on the integrity and surety of a person or thing". The absolute reliance on our senses can sometimes also be misleading. How many times have we constantly seen people in our society who suffer from delusions and hallucinations? They "sense" them, claim to see them, feel them, hear them, and sometimes even touch them! ...read more.


When someone throws something at you, you are likely to use your sense of vision, sound and maybe even smell as you would duck to avoid it hitting you. If you were to say, "no, senses should not be trusted" and stood there, you are likely to get hit. The outcomes of situations most likely leans towards trusting the senses in give us truth, rather than emotion or other cognitive approaches. These comparisons prove, according to most humans, that senses should be trusted in every situation, as it has helped them with small scale situations formerly. Thus, there are two different arguments that were proposed in this discussion. Senses should be trusted because they help humans with small scale situations, and the truth does not necessarily impact the outcome. The senses all aid in carrying out daily activities of life and connect the world together. However, does this mean that they should be trusted? Science has proved the "truths" that our senses give us to be false. Thus, if the presumed truths are faulty, then there are no truths with senses. On the other hand, if everyone is connected to each other with matter and energy, senses are radiated to other things and humans, affecting the whole world. Therefore, senses may evoke a general objective truth that leads man to connect to man, to objects and to the universal system, making life a process of understanding an absolute truth through different ways. ?? ?? ?? ?? Z. Somji 1 001147-081 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Art is a lie that brings us nearer to the truth (Pablo Picasso). Evaluate ...

    The four 'truth tests' could be carried out on a painting in order for the observer to define what is truth and what is the lie. The correspondence theory (senses), the coherence theory (use information provided by others), the consensus theory (agreement of a group), or the pragmatic theory (truth can be changed based upon an individuals requirements).

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    What needs to be considered here is that there is no such OBJECTIVE truth. The idea being proposed is that truth is, by principle mutable, changed according to any resolution achieved either individually or in accordance to any vast consensus agreed on by society.

  1. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    Through the senses, the relativity of perception and the world is comprehended, and they provide us with just sufficient knowledge to lead us through daily life. Being able to understand the world around us is something we have to gain, mostly through our senses, and therefore the importance of our senses is irrefutable.

  2. Outline of There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is ...

    Conclusion * There are absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false in certain area of knowledge and it is clear and obvious.

  1. Free essay

    When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    On a school visit to the Schaulager, we observed a piece of art that was composed of small household items. My senses provided me the information that there was a pile of many items somehow imperfect; however I reasoned that I had seen these items before therefore they must be authentic.

  2. This essay will explore how sense cannot be trusted to give us the whole ...

    We cannot choose to hear or see every detail around us; instead we subconsciously select different details according to our various degrees of awareness. For example, we become aware of a certain movement (hands of a clock ticking) only at a certain time even if it was always there from the start.

  1. When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?

    When we see a plate of food, we smell the food, and we go over to taste the food. If we see the plate of food, but when we go over to taste or touch it and the plate of food is not there, we will know that it is an illusion.

  2. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge of the world as it ...

    Thus, the brain, attempting to form a coherent unicolor picture, assumes that the parts of the illusion it cannot gather information from are simply black, like the rest of the picture.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work