• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of Knowledge; Scientific Methods Essay.

Extracts from this document...


Theory of Knowledge; Scientific Methods Essay The science is one of the important things in our life. There are basically 3 scientific methods to know and learn something. Those scientific methods are called "The Basic Scientific Method", "Falsificationism" and the "Scientific Revolution". Each of these scientific methods has their own benefits and problems. First, I will talk about "The Basic Scientific Method". It is a popular way to accept knowledge. We observe something first, then we make some generalizations and theories. Then finally we explain based on information that we collected from observations. For example, Isaac Newton found the law of universal gravitation by saw an apple dropping from a tree. ...read more.


If we can prove it, we can accept the statement but if we couldn't prove it, that means hypothesis is false. As a result, "Falsificationism" creates much certainty than "The Basic Scientific Method". For example, first I will state that the human can breathe in underwater. Then I need to prove or explain my hypothesis. Therefore maybe we can bring a wide range of people and make them try to breathe in underwater. Then we observed that the human couldn't breathe in underwater. So, this means my statement is false. The "Falsificationism" provides high certainty but this scientific method also has problem. The problem about this method is the difficulty of observation. It's easy to make any kind of hypothesis or theories. ...read more.


For example, in the ancient time, people thought that the earth is flat but the Copernicus said that the earth is round. This is a good example of paradigm shift. Many sciences developed using this method, but this method also have one problem. That is the difficulty of persuading people. Everyone accepted and believing present paradigm. It's extremely difficult to shift old paradigm to a new paradigm. To do this, you need very strong evidence and a power of persuasion. In conclusion, all of these 3 scientific methods have many advantages but I will recommend the "Falsificationism", because I think the science is the repetition of trial and error. If we try to make hypothesis, then try to prove it, maybe it takes a long time but I think the problem will solve someday. (600 words) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    A scientist may remove a decimal point; the historian may moves a few thousand people murdered. To what extent do we know that what we are learning is actually true? History is also constantly changing even though science isn't necessarily, but perception may change as science makes new discoveries, thus changing history.

  2. TOK Essay 3

    was thought to be wrong he would not comprehend how to manage. Our world is constantly evolving and making changes to things we already know or thought we knew. Therefore as the question asks, doubt can be the key to knowledge but there must be a balance between doubt and

  1. TOK essay

    The criminal is prosecuted justly and exactly as he should have been. However, once emotion is factored in, we may see a lighter or heavier sentence. This is due to the fact that the case itself not only provides the information we need for reason to be composed, but for emotion to be composed as well.

  2. Tok essay 2009

    La finalidad de los p�rrafos anteriores es mostrar que nunca podemos obtener un conocimiento certero e infalible sobre algo, siempre tendremos una duda o un error en nuestro an�lisis. Adem�s nuestro an�lisis nunca ser� igual al que realice otro sujeto.

  1. TOK-Language and persuasion

    The other team has got an upper hand in catching the majority attention and potentially ended up with more subscribing to them. What we may do to quickly grab the attention out of the winning team that probably has got a better deal/product would be putting their information of the

  2. Theory of Knowledge Essay

    The other scientific reasons for the question are we all have different education level, different attitudes, even particular moon could affect our perception and interruption and yes our believes and culture limits our perception, and the culture could change our conception, perception of something.

  1. TOK essay

    This will ultimately create different content and pictures, so it clouds the mind of the future reader. In the area of art, knowledge can be justified by the viewing of objects, such as paintings, papers, sculpture and more. Although this is a valid way of receiving knowledge, this too has its limitations.

  2. Defining and Analyzing Mixed Method Johnson and Christensen (2007) describe mixed research as the ...

    The in-depth information is frequently collected through extensive one-on-one interview with participants (Pan, 2008). This distinction between mixed, quantitative, and qualitative has implications for evaluating research, which are explored in the following line. For instance, the researcher topic will be ?Impact of Servant Leadership on the Academic workplace related outcome.?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work