• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of Knowledge

Extracts from this document...


TOK Practice Essay: "Different Cultures have different truths." "A truth is that which can be universally accepted." What are the implications for knowledge of agreeing with these opposing statements? Aakaanksh (A.K) Pothukutchi Friday, May 02, 2008 Mr. Richmond TOK According to Albert Einstein, one of the great minds of the human races, "Truth is what stands the test of time." The seemingly innocent looking question: "What is truth," appears in one's mind. In an effort to better humanity the elite minds have concocted three different theories of truth, none of which is individually satisfactory, but combined provide a glance into the "truth" about truth. The word truth, in context of the question, is a statement which conforms to fact and is commonly/universally accepted as the reality or actuality. At first glance, both statements appear to be contradictory in nature, as they transmit conflicting two conflicting ideas of truth. The first statement conveys the idea of relativism, the belief that what is true is what is accepted by one's culture/community; while the second statement dwells mainly on the idea of absolutism, a philosophical argument which claims that a statement is either absolutely true or absolutely false, leaving no room for any middle ground. ...read more.


Strong belief in subjective truth, regardless of rhyme or reason, usually renders knowledge tricky. For example, most Asian cultures believe that a strong academic base, with little room for anything else, is the only way to succeed in life. In stark contrast, the West, generally holds the development of a wholesome personality as top draw. These contrasting beliefs have caused considerable strife amongst leading academicians around the world. A strong belief in subjective truths, almost always, leads to one society attempting to impose its "truths" upon another (in some cases multiple) society; Hitler's Nazi's attempting to brainwash the World into believing that the Aryan's (the superior race), had every right to annihilate mere mortals. Inflammatory examples such as these bear witness to the fact that "different cultures have different truths." The first statement strongly implies that truth is not universal and is relative in nature. Knowledge is defined in the, Theory of Knowledge, as justified true belief, and is made uncertain when people choose to believe a truth, with varying levels of intensity. The implications for knowledge of agreeing with the first statement are that each culture (person within the culture) ...read more.


Plus the fact that they are accepted universally constitutes to our staying sane, by anchoring us to reality, our awareness of our current existence. Another example is that of the universally accepted ethical precept "Do unto others as you want done to you." Every "thinking" human being is automatically supposed to accommodate his/her basic human instinct, which dictates a uniform code of morality, the world over. The implications for knowledge of agreeing with this statement are clearer; rarely does one have to use objective value judgments in the justification of absolute truths. The absence of personal bias and beliefs results in nearly every one gaining access to a uniform and standard form of knowledge Both statements provide different implications for knowledge, the first allowing for a more biased and personalized version of knowledge while the second relies more on universal conformity. In conclusion I believe that the implication for knowledge, if we are to agree with the two opposing statements: "Different cultures have different truths" and "Truth is that which can be universally accepted", is the realization that cultural beliefs/truths do not necessarily tantamount to universal truths and gives rise to a further understanding of the ethical and moral decisions which we undertake, despite our differential cultural upbringing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. 3 truths

    Maybe major league women's baseball ended the depression. Pragmatic There is a possibility that the government ended the great depression. The statement could be true, but it's not useful. It doesn't matter what ended the great depression as long as it ended.

  2. Different cultures have different truths.

    It is a mathematical fact that 1+1=2. 1+1=2 for me, for my best friend, for the prime minister of Great Britain and for the computer on which I am typing this essay. It can never equal 4, no matter how much my history teacher may tell me that it does.

  1. "Different cultures have different truths." "A truth is that which can be accepted universally." ...

    This means that either one of them is false, or they are both right in certain situations and wrong in others. To answer this question, we must also ask ourselves "What is truth?" If we define truth as a reality, as something that is always correct no matter what, and

  2. Can we have beliefs or knowledge which are independent of our culture?

    It is necessary to find the right balance between taking knowledge on authority and relying on our own resources. Also if people, for acquiring knowledge that is independent of their culture, have a lack of courage, resources, confidence to think things out for yourself, then it will be tended to take all beliefs from second-hand from other people.

  1. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better it is. Discuss.

    If a falsifiable theory has passed the test without finding a case like that, then it could be accepted as a scientific truth.

  2. Discuss the view that we cannot justify absolutist moral rules in a multi cultural ...

    Therefore it stands in contrast to the deontological theory. But maybe this view is wrong, maybe moral decisions should always take into account the different circumstances of each situation? As said before moral relativism is mainly based on the precondition that there are no universal rules.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work