• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are no distinctions between what is true and false, Discuss with relation to history

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐TOK ESSAY: ?There are no distinctions between what is true and false.? Discuss with relation to history ________________ This statement is false in my opinion as distinctions can be seen between what is true and false. It may be hard to see the differences in relation to history because everything is from the past including any evidence. History can be supported through evidence from primary (interviews, letters, and diaries) and secondary sources (photographs, artefacts and other records from the past). Firstly, the definition of true must be clarified: It is a fundamental belief in the subject of Theory of Knowledge (ToK) which is built upon sensory perception, language, emotion and reason ? known as the four ways of knowing (WoK). To argue this statement, examples such as the holocaust and the history of Australia will be explored. As mentioned before, Theory of Knowledge is based on four ways of knowing which are reason, emotion, language and sensory perception. In history all of these are used to find ?truths?. ...read more.


Another example is Australian history. This includes the indigenous and the non-indigenous people?s perspective. Particularly concerning the issue around the celebration of Australia Day celebrated on the 26th, January being also Invasion day for the aboriginals. For Europeans this day is known as a new beginning and celebrated as a good event where people come together to celebrate being Australian. However, for the aboriginals this is a day of loss (land ownership, culture, family) when their rightful country was stolen from them. The history of aboriginals having been on Australia dates back a long time compared to the new Australians and this has been supported through scientific evidence such as the existence of humans identified through past skulls and signs of villages/tribes that have been found from years before the First fleet arrived at Sydney Cove (1788, 26th January). This specific example shows how there can be two histories for the same event that has taken place in history even if one party was there before the other. ...read more.


The example of Australian history provides indication that there may be two or more histories which are still true because of different perspectives. But in the example of the holocaust, there are two sides to the argument but one is definitely more believable than the other so we can rule out that: The perspective of Post modernists (biased opinion) is actually false even if they believe that it is true. This example shows that a person?s view on history may be biased because of higher authorities who can shape and change the belief of the community to support their claims. In conclusion, I believe there are distinctions between what is true and false. This idea is very important especially when wanting to know about the past. If we do not address certain truths in history we will be suggesting that anything can/could have happened - ?Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" (George Santayana). We need to know our past because we can learn valuable lessons especially from our mistakes. Sources: 1. http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/history/australian-aboriginal-history-timeline (aboriginal history) 2. http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/maps/googleearth.php (holocaust picture) 3. http://www.readengage.com/articles/soc6.php (Australia day/Invasion day picture) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK History Essay

    The aim of this essay is to explore the apparent greater link of history to the Ways of Knowing than mathematics. Based on the information presented above, it is clear that there is a certain difference in the effect of the Ways of Knowing on history and mathematics.

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    various ways of knowing and areas of knowledge like history and the arts. Since all knowledge has to pass our subjective minds to finally become knowledge, we can all knowledge as a blend between objectivity and subjectivity. The topic of the essay itself is penned in such a manner that

  1. Outline of There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is ...

    * On the other hand, subjects like natural sciences and mathematics; truth and false is simply, plain and straightforward, not circumlocutory. * Except simultaneous equation, there is a possible having more than one answer. * For instance, in mathematics, the answer for two plus three obviously is five, there is

  2. How do the 4 WOKS interact to give a picture of a reality?

    Our perception strongly affects reasoning. Biased perception, may contribute to inadequate reasoning. In history, 'blacks' and 'browns' were considered to be wild and unintelligent by the fair-skinned population.

  1. Which is the most reliable WOK?

    In fact it is important to reason with the help of ethics, arts, history, religion and human sciences. We must consider the rationality of humans, the morality of the question, the examples of good and bad judgments from history and the extent of creativity and irrationality involved in arts before reasoning an idea and coming to a conclusion.

  2. Are the WOKS controlled by language?

    Another problem is that since humans invent language, would language be appropriate for areas of knowledge which concepts are not human? Science would be an example. Is language restricting the expression of scientific concepts? Knowledge has logical components too. For example, merely knowing both "she kicked him" and "he cried"

  1. “True statements cannot become false, nor can false statements become true”.

    Therefore, under the current understanding of the title declaration, a statement cannot change over time and become true, even if statements identical to it made at a later time may be true. A second interpretation of the title, similar to the first, is that a statement can only be classified

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. Discuss

    Statements are neither absolutely true nor false. Logic is formed through empiricism. As we grow we observe that people grow taller as they go older and shrink or stop at some point. It?s logical because it happened as long as we can remember.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work