• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can knowledge produced by history and science be used to foretell the future?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent can knowledge produced by history and science be used to foretell the future? History, the study of the past and Science, any systematic knowledge-base or prescriptive practice, are two categories in which humans gain information and knowledge from. Many people believe that history and science interrelate, and that they can both be equally justified through explanations. There are different levels of certainty for each subject. There is a history of science, but there is no science of history, there is data of history, but there is no meaningful scientific theory of history. After rigorous empirical testing, a theory can be proven true or false, and can be proven as a generally accepted statement about reality. ...read more.

Middle

By close watch of the stock market and how it was performing, economist were able to predict what would happen in the near future, some even in the far, but it was not certain that this would actually happen, it was just a prediction they had, due to the performance of the market in the past and in the present. Also the prediction during the FIFA 2010 World Cup, that Paul the octopus would predict who the winners of the semi finals would be, Spain or Germany. This was based on a historical event, that Paul the octopus had already predicted five previous games for the German's and he has predicted the correctly. He predicted the win of Spain this year, by eating a mussel out of one of the two boxes, where one has the German flag, and the other the opponents flag, and yet again he was correct. ...read more.

Conclusion

Science is a more reliable source of prediction to the future. Due to experiments and test, it can be proven correct or incorrect. An example of correct prediction to the future using science is the testing of parental genes, and predicting whether their children are likely to have any physical or mental disabilities. After certain tests were conducted they were able to make a prediction and their prediction was correct. Due to certain annotations in the chromosomes, and different staining on the chromosomes, the scientists were able to test the recessive and dominant genes of the parents and predict whether their offspring are likely to have down syndrome or any other disease or physical disability. The scientist knew that their prediction was correct because of repetitive testing and reliable machinery. Science is therefore a much more reliable source in predicting the future due to completed tests and repetitive and trustworthy machinery used. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    history translate into our knowledge about the future and thus distort our approach. Making the future even more unclear is that our approach to knowledge about the future is only speculation, as compared to the past where we can be certain that parts of knowledge that we acquire about history are true or valid.

  2. TOK: Science and History

    Sometimes, scientists also build up untestable theories also built up on other untestable ones that end up making improbable assumptions such as Quantum Logic, that has managed to show us how little our understanding of the universe is; linking to the claim that science has proven that giving an exact picture of the universe is impossible.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    This statement by Charles F. Kettering justifies our excitement to know our future. That is specially so when we start relying on the language of horoscopes, fuse it with a clouded perspective and try to reach a logical conclusion. No actions can obliterate the past.

  2. "Only knowledge that can be proven by logic or empirical methods is meaningful" In ...

    Then we can come up with laws and proofs for knowledge. We use logic to discover and investigate correct modes of reasoning in which the property of truth in preserved. Logic gives the answer for the question about correct reasoning - the correct reasoning is a proof.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work