• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can we rely on the knowledge provided by human scientists?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

LB End of year theory of knowledge essay 2010 To what extent can we rely on the knowledge provided by human scientists? Human scientists try to explain human behaviour. By formulating theories to predict human behaviour, human scientists then develop solutions for the problems identified by those behaviours. Examples of disciplines that are part of the human sciences include anthropology, psychology and economics. Human scientists are concerned with organisms that are aware of their own existence, in contrast to natural sciences. Also human sciences involve people observing people. As human beings we are very hard to predict, so human scientists can not just explain our behaviour as a natural scientist would explain the behaviour of physical objects or animals. We make decisions consciously and with purpose. In this way, the work of human scientists and the evaluation process that they have to do is very different than the work of natural scientists. Human scientists usually involve their thoughts and experiences when they have to explain human behaviour. So how can we trust human scientists and their statements and how can we rely on the knowledge provided by them? ...read more.

Middle

However, since human scientists follow the scientific method, which includes peer reviews, errors and prejudices can be reduced or avoided. The inside method allows the investigator to obtain more details and information about the society and its individuals. It provides a better understanding of each individual, avoiding stereotypes and generalizations. Another factor that can make people lack confidence in human scientists is the fact that as humans we are not perfect and so judgments done by human scientists can be wrong. This is linked with the fact that there are many interests behind human studies. We just have to look at the work done in political science, which usually involves persuading people and deceiving populations to satisfy political interests. Economists and sociologists can also change some aspects of social and economic impacts in studies of for example how mining would affect communities in order to satisfy the interests of multinational companies or governments. It has also been proven that statistics sometimes do not present reality and that they are manipulated. However, this type of unethical acts can also occur in natural sciences. ...read more.

Conclusion

A big part of the knowledge we have nowadays comes from human sciences, so it is necessary for human beings to trust in these studies. We can not just rely on the knowledge provided by natural scientists since we would not be able to understand the behavior of human beings and how they we are linked with our environment and nurture. However, we should question science and not just believe in it without looking for evidence and for a complete picture of what is being presented. We are living in a globalize world that needs human scientists to provide knowledge of different cultures to help societies work together. We also know about the risks of changing traditions and cultures if human scientists get involved in a society. However, risks have always existed in the process of gaining knowledge and they have to be avoided as much as we can, but they also have to be faced in order to improve society. In this way, we can rely on the knowledge provided by human scientists by evaluating its objectivity. Concepts and theories are always improved and extended, so we must consider the fact that human scientists are trying to improve incomplete theories in order to improve human knowledge. Mario Cabani Mario Cabani ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    Hence, many laws and theories in the human sciences are probabilistic in nature. Human scientists cannot predict with absolute certainty the exact cause of a phenomenon, unlike cases in the natural sciences, but is able to predict the probability of it happening.

  2. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    then demonstrated for third parties, as an advance in understanding of the objective world. Such demonstrable knowledge would ordinarily confer demonstrable powers of prediction or technological construction. (Wikipedia) In Science,Paradigms are the main theories in a subject.It is noticed that dring `normal science` period most of the scientists wee trying

  1. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    soldier that was fighting in the trenches, I was able to experience and understand the main character as I read the novel.

  2. We will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Thus, it can be concluded that both novels and scientific psychology provide us with knowledge about human life and personality in different ways.

  1. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    strictly from the perspective of a young Arabian immigrant in Stockholm and is exceptionally subjective in it's storytelling I experienced understanding of the main character and his cultural confusion, thusly gaining knowledge of his behaviour and feelings, and therefore of his personality.

  2. To what extent can we rely on our sense perception to interpret knowledge through ...

    His parents were telling me that these incidents happened a lot and there were more times he predicts something that came true. This may be unbelievable for many and people like me do question the truth behind these kinds of stories.

  1. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    But, does the complete dependence of a natural science theory on reason give it immunity from scepticism? Despite extensive research and evidence collated since the 1800s in favour of Darwin?s theory as being true, using reason as an area of knowledge, there are still many sceptics in the world.

  2. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    There really is not any right and wrong here. Just different perceptions ably justified with adequate reason. Nearly all subjective areas of knowledge are full of examples like this. This brings us to a corollary of the topic under discussion. Possibly, the truth of Christopher Hitchens? claim cuts both ways.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work