• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is truth different in mathematics, arts, and ethics?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TOK Paper: To what extent is truth different in mathematics, arts, and ethics? What is meant by truth? Is it simply a synonym for reality, or a concept much more profound? Generally a dictionary would denote truth as something approximating to an established fact that corroborates with actuality. But does this definition interpret differently with context? Does "truth" refer to the same thing in a mathematical perspective as it does in arts or ethics? When attempting to answer, or at least approach, this question, an important issue to consider is the idea of subjectivity; while truth should correspond with reality, does that reality itself hold regardless of individual outlook? And if it does not, are the facts that are held to be true really so? In that regard, the areas of mathematics, arts, and ethics are of particular interest. This is due to the variety in the methods (or "ways of knowing") applied to acquire knowledge in them. The way of knowing most commonly associated with mathematics is reason, which makes sense since knowledge in mathematics is acquired through calculation and deliberate thought, where given facts are juxtaposed to reveal more implied realities. ...read more.

Middle

of the artist. Hence, a single piece of art has as many potential interpretations as it does critics, making its reality highly subjective. Thus the truth pertaining to a piece of art can also differ from individual to individual. However the intent of the artist cannot be denied as the purpose of a creation is determined by the creator himself; how well it does in that end is then dependent on the perspective, or taste, of the audience. But the aforementioned point about subjectivity would imply that it is virtually impossible for the artist's intent to match the critique - a problem that is somewhat extinguished by the establishment of styles within various forms of art. These styles are basically systematic forms of bias that act somewhat as a "language" for a particular work of art: different styles have different common traditions, such as abstract painting as opposed to a portrait, or modernist as opposed to feminist literature. If a critic knows the style employed by the artist, he or she can then evaluate the use of the principles and the limitations of that style and understand the meaning behind the work, almost like using an accepted mathematical equation to solve a complex problem. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is clear from previous statements that the definition of truth, despite common habits, cannot be taken for granted. It has been established that mathematics as a science consists of concrete, indisputable facts that are realized through reason. The logically grounded nature of math ensures that all truths in it are objective and cannot differ with perspective as there is simple no room for bias. Truth in arts, on the other hand, is highly dependent on the sensory intake and the emotional reasoning of the artist and, to lesser extent, that of the audience. The ambiguous nature of art results in a correspondingly vague definition of truth as there are no concrete facts available for corroboration. Moral values hand found themselves to vary from culture to culture, from continent to continent, with various communities having dramatically different ideas with respect to right and wrong. This leads to the truth in ethics being highly but not completely subjective so as most cultures agree on the atrocious nature of murder and the immeasurable value of a human life. Taking these factors into consideration, it can be concluded that truth does indeed largely differ between the areas of mathematics, arts, and ethics. ?? ?? ?? ?? Arsalan Beg-Menhaj ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    We then find the square root of 25 to find 5. Therefore, 'c' is equal to 5. By rearranging the equation, one can prove that the Pythagorean Theorem works. Instead of ??�+??�=??�, one can use ??�-??�=??�. So 25 minus 16 equal 9. And the square root of 9 equals 3.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, ethics and natural sciences?

    certainty of knowledge in ethics by the amount of people who believe that certain ways of behaviour are right. A few centuries ago the whole society believed that it is right to kill women with red hair because they were thought to be witches and just two decades ago gay

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

    But, when my teacher explained the concept of multiplication it went from Greek and Latin to plain common sense. When I saw 8 plus 8 would give me 16 ,and 8 multiplied into 2 gives me 16.It was all clear .The number adding itself to an extent which is the "2".

  2. Tok History. My thesis is that although history and our ethics will always ...

    life, although it is pretty present, it surges in various ways and maybe not so apparent at first. For example, the relationship I share with my mom. I truly love her and care for her greatly, however, I must admit that I constantly lie to her to a certain extent.

  1. TOk Discussion - Do we impose mathematics upon nature or is it naturally inherent ...

    Take phi, the Fibonacci sequence, the golden ratio. If what you say is true, then humans have gone out of their way to find patterns in nature. But I think that phi and its relation to beauty was present in human features before human investigation, even if the golden ratio mask is a human creation.

  2. Different cultures have different truths.

    laws of physics, and it would allow for what I consider to be the greatest accomplishment of humanity: the improvement and expansion of knowledge. If either of the prior two theories of truth were correct, then one idea is not inherently better or more correct than another.

  1. TOK. "Truth is that to which the community ultimately settles down" (Charles Peirce). Analyse ...

    Aristotle's ideas, for example, were accepted without question for centuries. Can one conclude that the community had settled on his ideas as truth? Absolutely not; further changes have been made. Perhaps one hundred or one thousand years from now, human culture will look back on our ideas as primitive, as

  2. Tok Art Assignment: My reactions on visiting the Art Gallery

    Art is based on the viewer?s perspective and the emotion, appeal and quality can vary from person to person. b) Computers are unable to create real art because they have no real emotions. The aspects of the art (created by a computer)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work