• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics? As human beings, we are constantly searching for this higher level of knowledge, truth, whether it is in the sciences, in our own lives, or in religion. For example, if I want to know how I can find the area of a triangle given two sides and an angle, I just refer to the trigonometry section of my math SL textbook, which gives the equation meeting those criteria as well as the proof. But by helping derive and justify the equation A =0.5absinC, the proof confirms this mathematical truth. For this question, I will step further into truth and our perception of truth, exploring the question: To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics? First, I feel it necessary to distinguish between the different truths that may exist simultaneously. Truth, in my opinion, can be classified into two categories: "hard" and "soft" truths. "Hard" truths are universally-accepted facts that can always be proven to be accurate and they are found most often in the areas of mathematics, natural sciences and history. Even in the arts and ethics, there are universal truths, such as the fact that Beethoven composed the Moonlight Sonata, A.R Rahman composed "JAI HO" or even the fact that Leonardo Da Vinci painted the "MONA LISA". ...read more.

Middle

There is a song my artist Mohombi called "In Your Head".Mohombi says his tune for the song is his own composition, but I can argue saying that the same tune is heard in the song "Cranbaries" by Zombie. By using evidence from the music to prove Mohombi mimics that tune, my claim then becomes a personal truth because I have specific evidence. However, I strongly feel such truths in the arts are affected by whom they are justified by. For example, if at an art exhibition, two men are discussing whether the painting is marvellous or not. And if one of them was an experienced art critic whereas the other one was a new art critic .i would take sides of that of the experienced one. Most likely, I would not investigate his claim. But that same trust would not exist for the new critic. Regardless of the validity of their arguments, I would value the "soft" truth the critic holds to a higher level. Just like "hard" truths in mathematics, "softer" truths in the arts encompass, but are more affected by, an element of trust. Since "soft" truths rely on a level of personal interpretation and facts, this subjectivity alters the quality of such a truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whenever I use public transportation , I have to abide by this unspoken rule. Without even thinking about it, I just automatically stand up if someone older than my parents gets on the bus. But if I did not stand up, another passenger would and it would make me seem rude. I feel there is almost an ulterior motive behind this truth in order to meet and fulfil societal guidelines. At this point, it is not a consideration of what I should do, but rather what I need to do. Because these guidelines are essentially rules, they ought to be followed and this truth becomes a "hard" truth. It lacks subjectivity because it is now based on rules and guidelines rather than on emotions and feelings. Similar to how mathematical truths do not rely on emotions, there are cases in ethics where truth and emotions become mutually exclusive. In conclusion, truth is interpreted in disparate fashions in mathematics, the arts, and ethics. While mathematics is comprised of "hard" truths, the arts and ethics are almost completely made of "soft" truths. However, different factors affect the quality of these "hard" and "soft" truths, what we use on a daily basis to better understand ourselves and our world. ?? ?? ?? ?? Rahul Manay 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    In mathematics, we learned about the Pythagorean Theorem. The Pythagorean Theorem's purpose is to find the unknown length 'c' by using the above equation. If 'a' is 3 and 'b' is 4, then how does one find 'c'? By using the Pythagorean Theorem (on a right triangle), we add the squared versions of 3 and 4 to equal 25.

  2. To what extent should our actions be guided by our theories in ethics and ...

    Nevertheless, our attempts to understand and explain all these natural phenomena can't be completely dismissed. Clearly there are limits to what theory can tell us about ourselves and our universe. Consequently caution must be used as we move from the known to the unknown.

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, ethics and natural sciences?

    We can be fairly certain that we all see the same things and the fact that mathematical truths apply to real life, makes truth in mathematics fairly certain. For example, we use statistics to find how big the percentages of occurrences in real life are and we have enough evidence to back that up in real life.

  2. Truth.People think that truth is relative because they could look at others points of ...

    For example, Ishaq Rabin was assassinated by his own people for encouraging a peace treaty with Palestine and giving Palestinians some of the land controlled by Israel. This brutal act shows that people are stubborn and this is caused by the imperfect truth that has been changed or distorted.

  1. TOk Discussion - Do we impose mathematics upon nature or is it naturally inherent ...

    V: But do these qualities apply to all theorems? We know that there are many methods to solve a problem. But is the simplest and most direct solution to a mathematical problem established as the most aesthetically appealing? Perhaps there may be a solution that is longer but demonstrates leaps in logic that are inspirational and elegant?

  2. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    But, is there an area of knowledge, in particular that is closer to the ?true? identity of the person or does all knowledge contribute to the sense of who we are with equal strength? Does knowledge that come by way of emotion or sense perception occupy a large share of

  1. Tok vocabularies - defining terms like "Truth" and "Belief"

    Their opinion could be biased because they are also human beings. Indoctrination is the process of forcing people to learn ideas, knowledge, attitudes, or any thing that a person can remember through repetitive instructions. It is a big problem that many schools in Korea use this method to teach.

  2. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    However, these advances are not without a price. In the computer and Internet world, it is our privacy that is at stake. In fact the very time when our computer is connected to the Internet, all the data we send or receive has the potential to be intercepted and retrieved

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work