• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TOK essay

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are reasons and emotions equally important to make a moral decision? Ans) A question that has long troubled moral philosophers is whether moral judgments are primarily the fruits of reason or of emotion. One tradition believes that moral judgments are largely the output of our emotional system. A competing tradition holds that while emotions are often heavily involved in the process of moral judgment, at heart our moral beliefs exist because of the distinctly human ability to reason - and thus distinguish right from wrong. Reason according to the standard dictionary definition is defined as "That which explains or accounts for any fact, act, proceeding or event". Emotion is defined as "an act or state of excited feeling", whereas moral means "dealing with or capable of distinguishing between right and wrong in conduct". Both reason and emotion are necessary to solve a moral dilemma. Reason itself is the process of mentally and consciously thinking something through with a sound sense of logic. Reason goes hand in hand with independence, where one gives moral law to one's self, by reasoning our mortality that we've acknowledged. This leads onto the idea of personal moral beliefs, which will be covered later. ...read more.

Middle

Without context, reason is non-existent. The same can be argued of emotion. However, reason acquires the facts and answers its logical decision. The only change exhibited is due to incorrect or useless facts. Emotion can change drastically over time and information given or proven wrong or useless. Emotion is considered a variable due to its extreme potential. Without a context, it cannot be classified as chaotic nor ordered, as it completely depends on the situation to generate the emotion itself. Unlike reason, one cannot be "taught" emotions. Humanity cannot put into words exactly what emotions are but still experiences them. It is the foundation of the arts that imprints emotion into the physical world for us. Thus, the artist has almost nothing to express without their emotions. The specific categories and types of arts could have never flourished without emotion, for reason by itself would label art as an unnecessary part of humanity. To explain how vastly complex emotions are, consider the following example. Blue and azure are both relatively the same word. However azure signifies a more specific response that humanity links with previous events and images. ...read more.

Conclusion

At a certain point, this can become so large that it becomes a cultural or even global viewpoint. In most civilized parts of the world, killing people is seen as a crime. This at one point was not true and is still false in some countries that are rife with war or just not civilized enough to have established this. However, morals cannot be fully determined without a specific enough context, otherwise we are presented with conflict. A lack of context leads to too many variables, which does not allow a stable foundation for morals to exist upon. Thus, we must have juries to decide what happens to the convicted, as one person cannot conceive and decide upon all possibilities alone. The amount of reason and emotion needed to justify moral decisions depends on the personal moral belief of the individual and the context of the situation. However, due to how closely interrelated both emotion and reason are, it is difficult to say they are not equally necessary in justifying most decisions. The areas of knowledge where reason diverts from emotion is when one is presented with an ordered system, such as math or some sciences. The reciprocal effect works for emotion and its areas of knowledge, such as art. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Tok essay- context is all

    Experiences can be described with ample detail, and pictures can give us a sense of how something should look: however, the fact is that the truth described will never be the same as the truth experienced. The painting 'Still life of fruit'5 can give a good representation of fruit, and

  2. are reason and emotion equally necessary in the justifying a moral decision

    How can this statement be justified? By logical reasoning: * Honour killings are wrong. * Honour killings are considered as murder. * Murder is wrong. * Murder is the unnecessary taking of life. * The woman is alive. These are a few reasons as to why it is wrong.

  1. Are Reason and Emotion Equally Necessary in Justifying Moral Decisions?

    The time had come for me to decide whether I would inform my parents or not about his behavior. Today, I will justify the decision I made; reason and emotion were both involved. I cared deeply for my brother and didn't want to see him get hurt.

  2. Reason and emotions in justifying moral decision

    We, the boats cannot retaliate much to our emotion, which are the tides. Moreover, they are not dependent on cognition, reason or perception. To have an engagement with the people and the world around us requires emotions. We must be able to understand and be able to sympathise with others

  1. Matrix Essay; Red v.s Blue Pil?

    However relevant these reasons may be, I don't feel them sufficient, as discovering the truth isn't worth the "desert" you would be entering. You would be giving up a life you thought was real and wasn't ever bothering you before you knew about the pills to be in a place

  2. Are Reason and Emotion Equally Neccessary in Justifying Moral Decisions?

    It would appear that emotional thought restrains human logic in the processing of moral decisions. It could be suggested that emotions are just as important as reason when justifying moral decisions if the outcome benefits a greater number of people than it harms (to a certain extent).

  1. IB TOK Essay Is moral knowledge omnipresent, and how exactly do we procure it?

    It is accepted amongst most scientific communities today that scientific knowledge is present in Nature, and that Man simply infers it from Nature. This seems to portray that there is some sort of heavenly body (God, perhaps) that has created this knowledge and used it to design Nature.

  2. Matrix Essay- would you take the red or blue pill? TOK - 90%

    However, both Descartes and Neo recognize there is a truth beyond what they see as potential illusions in the current state. I believe that being able to tell between truth and illusion is greater than living in only a fake world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work