• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TOK Essay

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Homo sapiens - or what is so called "human" - heavily relies on science. Science is the fundamental source of knowledge, it is the basis for the development of the society, it is one of the core factors that lead to the absolute domination of human beings over other living species. "The three cardinal aims of science are prediction, control, and explanation; but the greatest of these is explanation"1. Another important aspect of life that makes us unique is our ability to explain certain circumstances in the context of history. We explore, explain and analyze the past to optimize the present, we make sure mistakes occurred in the past will not be repeated in the future. This essay will be focused on the similarities and differences between the two concepts scientific and historical explanation. The two concepts are similar in the way that they are both based on certain assumptions, which we call the basic generalization from which everything begins. Scientific explanation based its results on suppositions, and those suppositions that are tested repeatedly by experiments and correspond to our perceptions towards a phenomenon in reality are considered to be "true" or "factual". Let us have a look at the theory of hybridization proposed by chemist Linus Pauling in 1932 to explain the formation of a methane molecule. Scientists at that time (and still now) did not understand how different shaped atomic orbitals can give rise to equal bonds in molecule like methane, so they came up with an idea of hybrid orbitals, open a new perception towards chemistry. ...read more.

Middle

The WWII started in 1939, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki...are mere irrefutable facts so we can offer a non-controversial interpretation of the "objectivity of the past". This objectivity does not hold when historians take into consideration of abstract events, for example, the Taiping Rebellion, a large-scale revolt in China from 1850 to 1864, during the Qing dynasty. Explaining an event that happened in this Rebellion (why did it start, why Hong Xiuquan, the leader, can attract so many people) requires a great accumulation of factual information, and the event of the Taiping Rebellion is the product of knitting all the facts together, which does not constitute an objective historical entity. Differently, objectivity in science is more obvious and straight forward. Science is supposed to be completely impartial, it is neutral to a communist or a capitalist. "To hear something is 'scientifically proven' is almost the same thing as hearing that it is 'definitely true'4. No one would refute the concepts in Newtonian physics, no one would not agree that the earth is revolving about the sun. Science is something that is free from controversial, supposedly. The fact that most of us are living relying on the help of technology imposes on ourselves the truth science is absolutely "right", or "objective". Unfortunately, despite its objective nature, sometimes it is used for personal purposes. A famous controversial topic is the landing on the moon of the USA. The landing was filmed, and it was thought to be true since science (cameras) ...read more.

Conclusion

Being critical, we can't say whichever of them is more important, since there's a difference in the purpose of scientific and historical explanations. Scientific explanation helps us to understand the world we live, hence we can utilize resources to optimize our lives while historical explanation helps us to explain the past, learn from the past and prevent the past to happen again in the future. We learned about the outbreak of WWI and WWII to prevent the threat of WWIII. Each of the two has its own priority and importance. The two concepts have similarities and differences. Those similarities and differences have been illustrated throughout the essay, providing a better understanding of what science and history are. The two concepts are both crucial in human's development, contributing to promote human to be the most dominant species in the Earth while human has only existed for twenty thousand years - a short period of times compared to other species like reptile; it is not a hyperbole to say, those two concepts are the reasons for our survival - "survival for the fittest". 1 "Scientific explanation" for the Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Michael Strevens 2 "Philosophy of History" - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Daniel Little 3 "Theory of Knowledge" - Nicolas Alchin - Page 125 4 "Theory of Knowledge" - Nicolas Alchin - Page 15 5 http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm ?? ?? ?? ?? Toan Ngo Topic 10: What similarities and differences between historical and scientific explanation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK essay

    Similarly adherers of religion11 put their faith in the behavior of their heroes or other symbols of progressive moral behavior. This branch of knowing, however, is a balancing-act, and involves a margin of error. Shinichi Fujiwara was a leading archaeologist, nicknamed "God's hand"12 by Japanese Medias, another authority, and had

  2. TOK Essay 3

    Although history cannot be changed, we can find truth that had not been previously thought of. Reasonably now we know that not all Germans are bloodthirsty, however there are people who still believe every fact they have seen based on the victors' perspective.

  1. Tok Essay - Question 5 2010

    For this reason, certainty is a critical element of any mathematical proof, and mathematical conjectures that have not been proven are rarely taken seriously by mathematicians.

  2. TOK essay

    He did this not just by re-arranging the formula in a different way; he did this by using previous rules and built upon it. Here, he used his own, personal, knowledge to come up with something easier for him to understand the subject.

  1. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    The fact that sometimes science is used to prove historic facts and aid in the explanation process is relevant. E.g.: The use of Carbon14 (Cu14) to find the exact date of an old material which is supposedly dated from the 1800�s.

  2. TOK Essay

    Many empirical studies have provided convincing evidence toward the idea that chemical imbalances do correlate with emotional disorders, and that medication does improve the severity of the disorders.3 This biological interpretation is limited in that the entire cause of the disorders is not explored.

  1. Science and an accumulation of facts -TOK essay

    By using axioms as the foundation of the premises, mathematical proof is formed with the aid of valid deductive reasoning. These proofs then combine to form theorems and these theorems are then used to form further complex theorems, such as Geometry and Algebra, which ultimately give rise to the entire Mathematical structure as another massive area of knowledge.

  2. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    That means even when users are not on the site, the cookies are still tracking your browsing habits, and sometimes sending the information you browse to your Facebook account and posted on your wall. For example, when you are browsing the websites/ using the applications which are connected to the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work