• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


TOK ESSAY How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true? Author: Luka Dremelj Mentor: mag. Matev� Rudl Word count: 1005 Date: 28/5/2009 Our quest of finding truth in life, which is a journey of a thousand miles, begins not with a step, but rather a thought. It is the miracle of the human mind to be able to think emotionally as well as rationally about the acquired information from our senses and later even being able to express ourselves through language. These are the four ways of knowing, all of them tell a great deal about ourselves on their own, but in combination, they may just help us obtain the real truth, if such a thing even exists. So what is truth? Truth has to this day not yet been specifically defined, but there are several ways of explaining it. One of them is the common truth, which is usually presented upon us by the society we live in. Such an example would be that prostitution is immoral. One would see this as human trafficking and sexual abuse with no benefits to the society. ...read more.


Reason is but more than just an acquaintance of emotion, which is a mental and physiological state associated with a mixture of behavior, feelings and thoughts. To put it simply the two are in love. As is with love, a couple may cuddle or quarrel, depending on the current situation their relationship found itself in. Unfortunately, most relationships tend to have a dominator and a submitter, meaning that we can rarely come across a fulfillment of both. Or in some cases, there is a form of harmony where they seem to have an agreement on who reacts to and decides on what. Regardless of their struggle, they pose another two ways of knowing. Reason may be a useful thing whenever time is plentiful and conditions right, but it is usually emotion that makes decisions regarding our well being in everyday life. So with that in mind, a safe bet on trust should be with reason right? I would now consider this as getting ahead of myself. There is a reason why no one prefers one from the other even after an eon of human contemplation. I would plainly put it that we are built in such a way that we conflict with ourselves; this might be a reason why our brain is so well trained in solving problems. ...read more.


As I hope you have come to understand, experience is the driving force behind all the ways of knowing so far. Experience is the only thing we can be sure is real to us and seems like a certain path towards the truth. Yet somehow I find that it is flawed, due to the fact that we acquire it through our fourth way of knowing, which are our senses. I am going to assume the position that everyone is familiar with the possibility that our senses are deceiving us. Each and every single one is wired to present us with a reality most compatible to that of others. People are known to think outside the box, can we expect ourselves to sense outside our senses. Evaluating the data passed to you I see we have yet to concretely determine the sure way of knowing. As I have presented, each in itself is incapable of providing an answer to us, but when all of them are used in collaboration with each other, we can get a clear idea that it is true for us to know that we don't know what is true and I gain my certainty that I have to believe what I know to be true. ?? ?? ?? ?? II. GIMNAZIJA MARIBOR International Baccalaureate __________________________________________________________________________________ Luka Dremelj IB 2008/2010 Theory of Knowledge 28/5/2009 Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Free essay

    IB TOK essay

    the mutilated chessboard using mathematical deductive logic.8 Provided this logic and the mathematical axioms (e.g. one domino will always cover two squares) are correct, knowledge derived from mathematics can solve this problem with certainty whereas knowledge obtained from science cannot.

  2. TOK essay

    The theory gets support from such examples, since it is true that it works in reality. Nevertheless, its basis is inductive reasoning and perception, which are no guarantees of the truth. Peter could test the hypothesis that his wife committed adultery.

  1. TOK essay

    For example, during class we have been looking at poetry, one of the poets looked at was the Irish poet Seamus Heaney. We were studying some of his early work, one of the poems looked at was that of "The Early Purges", before any outsider suggestions I just accepted the

  2. Tok Essay - Question 5 2010

    Popperian falsificationism maintains that all scientific conclusions are almost entirely provisional. Popper denies the existence of any form of ultimate verification in science, ensuring that a conclusion is always to be held provisionally. Shermer's absolute claim that science holds a "belief in the provisional nature of all conclusions" runs parallel

  1. TOK essay

    la cultura de estas personas, en su mayor parte de escasos recursos, sumada a sus creencias arraigadas sobre el poder de Jes�s, La virgen o el divino ni�o son evidentemente los pilares que determinan cual conocimiento es para ellos el m�s importante.

  2. Tok essay- context is all

    The only way necessary to determine the truth is to put it to use in the world. The only thing that concerns a pragmatist is what different a statement's being true of false makes in practice. This counters less what is necessarily true and more what facts are found to be more useful.

  1. Art assignment TOK

    Do you have the same reactions to the works online as you did viewing them in person? What's missing? Is this important in viewing art? Can we have the same understanding of something filtered through a "virtual experience" as exposed to actually experience it in person?

  2. TOK essay

    Thus by taking emotion and reason as separate entities, they may be assessed as to how they separately function in the decision-making process. If decisions were solely based on reason, the justifications for any acts would be extremely logical with little or no error.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work