• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TOK essay- Can language be said to hinder thought?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Can language be said to hinder thought? Samir Kothari 11.2 TOK Essay Language is not just a tool for expression; it is not just a vehicle for the transmission of knowledge, its more than that. Language shapes our thoughts in profound ways. It can be defined as a conventional code of symbols, which allows a sender to convey a message that can be understood by a receiver. We use language for several purposes, such as expressing our feelings, writing literature, describing things etc. However, language is not perfect, it has its limitations. Language hinders thought. Apart from the problems of the meaning of words in language, such as its vagueness (words such as big and small are vague since it does not provide information of how big or small), ambiguity (possibility of having a different meaning, can never be sure what the sentence/word means or is intended to mean) which is widely used by politicians, secondary meaning (the connotation or denotation of a word and the usage of euphemisms), metaphors and irony; which makes it difficult to convey thought. ...read more.

Middle

However, stereotypes hold some truth in them. For example, if you go in a French restaurant, the environment id likely to be romantic. However to distinguish between harmless generalization and a stereotype, it must be known that stereotypes mostly exaggerate the negative features of a certain group. Linguistic relativity also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (however this is a misnomer) states that language determines our experience of reality, and we can see and think only what our language allows us to see and think. Linguistic relativity is the linguistic theory that the semantic structure of a language shapes or limits the ways in which a speaker forms conceptions of the world. Since the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis claims that language determines the way we think, it can be defined as a form of language determinism. A popular example would be about the Inuit. They are said to have many different words for snow. Since the have such sophisticated vocabulary for the word snow, they are able to distinguish and describe snow in a broader spectrum. ...read more.

Conclusion

The women spoke in English with their husband, children and other speech situations, however spoke Japanese together to gossip or discuss about their lives at home. Since they spoke in two languages, they inhabited to different language worlds, where each of them thought differently in each of the language worlds. The experiment went such that two interviews took place with the same questions, however the difference between them were that, one was asked in Japanese, and the other in English, and the results were astonishing. For example: Real friends should? help each other (Japanese)?be very frank (English). As seen, there was a large difference in the attitude of the speaker when speaking in different languages, thus concluding that the language changes thought. Language is not perfect, and tends to hinder thought. As seen through the Japanese women, people who speak different languages think differently. Labels cause people to think of things as part of a category instead of individually, which causes them to ignore a particular thing?s individuality. And, stereotypes give false interpretations (though sometimes true) of people solely based on the group that they belong to. Therefore to conclude, language does hinder thought. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Does language help or hinder the way we acquire knowledge?

    The knowledge we acquire from our education is mainly what we learn from communicating with their teachers. The communicating by which we share the information clearly requires language.

  2. Free essay

    IB TOK essay

    Is the life of a person with a disability any less valuable or fulfilling than that of an able-bodied person?" Scientific knowledge cannot answer the problems of ethics that it has created as it lies outside the realm of ethics.

  1. Does Language Determine or Limit Thought?

    language in its name and partly because a message can be conveyed with this method. 6 It is true that they cannot express most of their feelings without verbal language, but their thought is not fully limited as they can still use sign language.

  2. Does language determine or limit thought?

    be expressed with the use of language then it does not exist to others (or it is not known). For instance, "if someone doesn't believe in fairies, he doesn't need to teach his children 'there are no fairies'; he can omit to teach them the word 'fairy'."

  1. TOK essay

    In favor of the proposition, it coheres/corresponds to observations from reality: Phone-calls, noises, etc. Truth, however, doesn't follow logically. To claim so is invalid because the secret calls could be related to something else.15 Truth is transparent. Knowledge isn't solely justified by factuality, because such is not entirely justifiable.16 The

  2. ToK Language Essay. The extent and type of our language defines ...

    There are some who argue that since communication between individuals was present when these early societies started to form, language was too and so, consequently, it was really language and not emotion that paved the wave for human culture. However, these people forget that language is really the complex system of human interaction.

  1. IB ToK - The Language of Chemistry - Does it direct or limit our ...

    While the laws may be limiting our creative thinking, science is an inductive way of thinking. Even though we cannot prove certain theories or laws right, scientists constantly try to disprove them, and only then are they dismissed. So far the fundamental laws of chemistry have yet to be disproved

  2. To what extent is language necessary for thought?

    Abstractions in language help us to classify ideas into groups so that we may generalize or specify parts within a label. For instance, a car is made up of many parts such as the engine, the wheels, the body, etc.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work