• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ToK Essay - Knowledge through Rationalism and Empiricism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐ToK Essay - Knowledge through Rationalism and Empiricism What is knowledge? Knowledge is defined in different ways, it is defined as ?the psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning? by Princeton or ?expertise, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education? by the Oxford English Dictionary. Either way, there are two sectors of philosophy that attempt to undermine knowledge by authority, rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism is the view that certain knowledge can be discovered through experience and reason alone. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the arguments against deductive logic is that you must have absolute certainty towards your decision as well as having a valid and logical point. Empiricism suggests that all knowledge is derived by our senses. There are various types of senses, our sense of sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch are called objective senses whereas our senses from the inner surfaces of our body are called visceral senses. Proprioceptive sensors are those that control our physical coordination and our equilibrium enables us to maintain our balance. ...read more.

Conclusion

Colour is an experience in our minds involving optical inputs being converted to electrical impulses sent to the brain and decoded into messages which we interpret as colour, therefore if colour is in our minds, then there is no colour in the world of things and objects ? an apple would only appear red to me but it?s not, objectively speaking, red. Both sectors of knowledge are significant in defining what it really is. Rationalism and empiricism are used to establish independent centres of certainty in changing our perspective on knowledge by authority. However, each have their own limitations which, if passed, may lead to skepticism ? the view that denies that knowledge is possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Rational Criticism - TOK

    The ambiguity of language also creates a discrepancy in relation to the way others perceive things. No knowledge is transmittable without language. Language is a powerful way of giving information - we can use it to make simple classifications, or on the other hand, make too simplistic of a classification.

  2. Matrix Essay; Red v.s Blue Pil?

    How would you know it was real? Morpheus also said: "What is "real"? How do you define "real"?" which shows that even if you took the red pill and thought you were going into the "real world", how would you know it was actually real?

  1. Empiricism vs. Rationalism

    This concept of self is something that is very hard to prove - we cannot demonstrate it empirically, much as we cannot demonstrate that our mind holds thoughts or that our hearts supposedly hold emotion. These are instances that would be deemed false by the more scientific empiricism, as they

  2. Rationalism vs. Empiricism

    A problem of knowledge for empiricism would be that one might be colorblind and therefore cannot see that an apple is red thus they must be told that the apple is red in order to aquire the knowledge about the true color of the apple.

  1. Coherence Essay

    as the population of White-tailed deer in Northern Michigan can not be determined by empirical tests, or can they? Even questions that are based in the "harder sciences" cannot be proved by these truth tests. David Hume took care of that when he dismantled the empiricists' theories on perception.

  2. Theory of Knowledge Essay

    in the eye: light -> retina -> optical nerve) or biological (e.g. in the nose: particle -> receptor -> olfactory nerve) processes into electrical impulses which pass on to the brain. A good way to realise how prone to mistakes these processes can be is to consider artificial flavours in food.

  1. Theory of Knowledge Essay

    It is an extreme thing, but a couple of people suffer in the world from synaesthesia, it means they can 'smell' colours instead of seeing them and perceiving with their eyes or they can 'feel' tastes, or some people in the world have sixth sense, they can feel danger forward,

  2. Theory of Knowledge Essay on Choices in the World ...

    is one of the most fascinating and incomprehensible quirks of natural selection. And sometimes, our "information processing systems", designed with lion-detection in mind, are fooled. Who hasn't seen the optical illusion of the "Penrose Triangle", and, more importantly, who hasn't been fooled by it?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work