• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ToK Essay - Knowledge through Rationalism and Empiricism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐ToK Essay - Knowledge through Rationalism and Empiricism What is knowledge? Knowledge is defined in different ways, it is defined as ?the psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning? by Princeton or ?expertise, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education? by the Oxford English Dictionary. Either way, there are two sectors of philosophy that attempt to undermine knowledge by authority, rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism is the view that certain knowledge can be discovered through experience and reason alone. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the arguments against deductive logic is that you must have absolute certainty towards your decision as well as having a valid and logical point. Empiricism suggests that all knowledge is derived by our senses. There are various types of senses, our sense of sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch are called objective senses whereas our senses from the inner surfaces of our body are called visceral senses. Proprioceptive sensors are those that control our physical coordination and our equilibrium enables us to maintain our balance. ...read more.

Conclusion

Colour is an experience in our minds involving optical inputs being converted to electrical impulses sent to the brain and decoded into messages which we interpret as colour, therefore if colour is in our minds, then there is no colour in the world of things and objects ? an apple would only appear red to me but it?s not, objectively speaking, red. Both sectors of knowledge are significant in defining what it really is. Rationalism and empiricism are used to establish independent centres of certainty in changing our perspective on knowledge by authority. However, each have their own limitations which, if passed, may lead to skepticism ? the view that denies that knowledge is possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Rational Criticism - TOK

    The ambiguity of language also creates a discrepancy in relation to the way others perceive things. No knowledge is transmittable without language. Language is a powerful way of giving information - we can use it to make simple classifications, or on the other hand, make too simplistic of a classification.

  2. Matrix Essay; Red v.s Blue Pil?

    V My conclusion is that I believe that in this case "ignorance is bliss" as Cipher said, because living in the "real world", or what you can assume is the "real world", isn't better to living in the Matrix where you think you are in the "real world" and where the lifestyle is much better.

  1. Empiricism vs. Rationalism

    This concept of self is something that is very hard to prove - we cannot demonstrate it empirically, much as we cannot demonstrate that our mind holds thoughts or that our hearts supposedly hold emotion. These are instances that would be deemed false by the more scientific empiricism, as they

  2. Rationalism vs. Empiricism

    A problem of knowledge for empiricism would be that one might be colorblind and therefore cannot see that an apple is red thus they must be told that the apple is red in order to aquire the knowledge about the true color of the apple.

  1. TOK essay

    Like alcohol, love affects the physical aspects of humans. Besides serotonin,13 other hormones have increased activity in the brain's perceptive judgment centers. In context to "truth," it shows interpretations of observations can be distorted by perspective and other factors, such as emotions. Synthesis of information from any source without this tool of knowing is hard.

  2. Coherence Essay

    Of course there must have been some miscommunication when Eusane Bolt and Michael Phelps were born. Moral questions do not seem to be so concrete that they can be answered in labs by measuring the distance between point A and point B, however no one can argue that something such

  1. Theory of Knowledge Essay

    in the eye: light -> retina -> optical nerve) or biological (e.g. in the nose: particle -> receptor -> olfactory nerve) processes into electrical impulses which pass on to the brain. A good way to realise how prone to mistakes these processes can be is to consider artificial flavours in food.

  2. Theory of Knowledge Essay on Choices in the World ...

    off track, and the implications of such a statement are truly horrific: how many things do we fail to notice, with what certainty can we ascertain that what we in passing perceive as being self-consistent is indeed so? How much of our knowledge contradicts itself?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work