• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ToK Essay - Knowledge through Rationalism and Empiricism

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐ToK Essay - Knowledge through Rationalism and Empiricism What is knowledge? Knowledge is defined in different ways, it is defined as ?the psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning? by Princeton or ?expertise, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education? by the Oxford English Dictionary. Either way, there are two sectors of philosophy that attempt to undermine knowledge by authority, rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism is the view that certain knowledge can be discovered through experience and reason alone. ...read more.


Furthermore, the arguments against deductive logic is that you must have absolute certainty towards your decision as well as having a valid and logical point. Empiricism suggests that all knowledge is derived by our senses. There are various types of senses, our sense of sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch are called objective senses whereas our senses from the inner surfaces of our body are called visceral senses. Proprioceptive sensors are those that control our physical coordination and our equilibrium enables us to maintain our balance. ...read more.


Colour is an experience in our minds involving optical inputs being converted to electrical impulses sent to the brain and decoded into messages which we interpret as colour, therefore if colour is in our minds, then there is no colour in the world of things and objects ? an apple would only appear red to me but it?s not, objectively speaking, red. Both sectors of knowledge are significant in defining what it really is. Rationalism and empiricism are used to establish independent centres of certainty in changing our perspective on knowledge by authority. However, each have their own limitations which, if passed, may lead to skepticism ? the view that denies that knowledge is possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Rational Criticism - TOK

    When one has faith, he/she believes it to be true without doubt - even when there may be no tangible proofs. This perception of what one holds to be true changes the way that he/she might reason, versus someone who refutes it.

  2. Empiricism vs. Rationalism

    This concept of self is something that is very hard to prove - we cannot demonstrate it empirically, much as we cannot demonstrate that our mind holds thoughts or that our hearts supposedly hold emotion. These are instances that would be deemed false by the more scientific empiricism, as they

  1. Rationalism vs. Empiricism

    A problem of knowledge for empiricism would be that one might be colorblind and therefore cannot see that an apple is red thus they must be told that the apple is red in order to aquire the knowledge about the true color of the apple.

  2. TOK essay

    gap between certainty and the hardly quantifiable reliability of a knowledge claim has to be compensated for by conviction/faith.17 Peter, therefore, is left with different knowledge claims to be justified/rejected, and with the task of defining the truth-spectrum. In context to the prescribed question, the likeliness that a tool of

  1. TOK essay

    in Paris six years ago, I inductively reasoned10 that the French are rude people. Yet, as I realized when I met French exchange students last month, this was, in fact, a hasty statement. Here, if reason as a way of knowing was taken as the standard, the conclusion seemed to

  2. Coherence Essay

    The last and apparently most credible truth claim is the empirical test, an unbiased experiment that can be repeated with similar results by anyone with the necessary equipment. This seems like a reasonable way to test the truth. Do you need anything else to establish what is true, what is good, beautiful, than consistent, repeatable results in experiments?

  1. Matrix Essay; Red v.s Blue Pil?

    how does he know he is actually going into the "real world" when he leaves the stimulation? Morpheus says: "How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world?" which is a very important question as why would you give up a benevolent dream world for the risk of going into a malevolent one?

  2. TOK essay

    Without these four basic structures, we are unable to interact with the area of knowledge in a logical fashion. However, this is a structure of numbers, not of the real world. To create model which works in the real world, an example with isolated reason must be presented.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work