• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TOK Essay on Natural Sciences

Extracts from this document...


Natural Sciences Morality concerns with the concepts of right and wrong for each individual Is morality possible without religion? I think morality is possible without religion since morality is not based on religion and religious beliefs are just rules and morals that contribute to each individual's overall moral values. A Christian would believe not to steal, not to kill and a must to respect their parents as a moral value as they are part of the Ten Commandments and it is accepted to be the right thing to do however an atheist would also have the same morals. These morals may be taught to them by their parents, teachers or any authoritative figure or moulded by the media or even the atmosphere and peers they grow up in and with. Moral values without the backing of religion might be established by self-defence, positive self-interest, their love for others and basically anything that would be physically or spiritually beneficial to the individual. Atheists would treat others kindly and helpfully for self defence as this treatment towards others would usually have a positive reciprocate behaviour from others, thereby increasing their happiness. On the contrary, if an individual treat other selfishly and abusively, it would be likely that they would be treated in the same way by others which would lead them into having negative feelings. ...read more.


Should the person who invented the knife be held responsible for the fact that Julius Caesar got turned into a human pincushion? No, the knife was invented as a tool for non-murdering means. If the inventor of the knife actually killed someone with that knife, then yes, they should be held responsible. But so long as the discovery was meant to be used in a safe, non-harmful way, then the scientists should not be held responsible for another person's actions. Most of the time scientists invent something because they feel that it will help society. For example, stem cell research, this has many applications to science and treating people with diseases, but other people have to go the extra step and use it for wrong use. I am sure the inventor might feel guilt for what he made, but it is not his fault for other people's misuse. However, the atomic bomb project might be a different example. Albert Einstein along with many other scientists discovered and invited the atomic bomb during World War II and they have intended to use it as a tool for improper moral use in other words, to substantially hurt and kill others. This is the common viewpoint of mankind however it can be argued that the invention of the atomic bomb by scientists puts an end to World War II and to all the potential damages that can be caused by the attacking parties for example the German Nazis. ...read more.


Religion rejects scientific evidence to justify and support Bronze Age myths. I think religion does not reject scientific evidence, it just choose to belief Bronze Age myths and shut their eyes towards the scientific evidence laid out. Religion relies of belief and if you believe it to be true, then it is a moral truth however if you do not believe if to be true and you believe in scientific evidence or simply do not believe in either, then you would not establish it as a moral truth. Do the natural sciences make assumptions that are improvable by science? This is due to the fact that the natural science uses induction reasoning and the process of elimination. One hypothesis cannot be proven correct just because of the large sum of experiment carried out and therefore the conclusions and analysis drew out by the experiment. This is due to the fact that science only considers the limited outcomes out of the infinite outcomes and this is a major flaw within natural science since it is so controlled and a theory or law can only be proven correct when everything else is controlled. Therefore, scientific evidence and research could be unreliable for being a type of evidence. ?? ?? ?? ?? Joyce Kwan 12B TOK - Ms. Balan & Mr. Graham 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Art assignment TOK

    one piece of work in specific, others become famous because they are constantly creating good art and influence a lot of new artist to come out and paint.

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    Hence, a theory is more acceptable if people can find common trends or patterns they can relate to in terms of personal experiences, reactions or behaviors to certain situations or what they intuitively feel to be true and logical. This may be one of the main reasons why theories in the human sciences are believed by communities to be true.

  1. Arts and Sciences essay

    Perception is known to be very subjective regardless of the sense because different people have different abilities and tastes. We know perception is subjective because one person might perceive something different from his/her acquaintance. For instance, in the movie A Beautiful Mind, the protagonist Nash has taken drugs therefore he hallucinates.

  2. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    through years and how it is upmentioned: Scientific belief change over time.Scientific method not always achieve success,for a couple of reasons: * Observations are based on senses,so they are empirical.Knowing that our senses are not always accurate,as a result observation might be unaccurate as well.Sometimes confirmation bias may happen: our

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    Heathcliff, whose origins are pretty much unknown, is different from everyone else at Wuthering Heights. Heathcliff is a dark skinned orphan and his arrival at Wuthering Heights causes some issues. In addition to social class and gender being a limitation to pursing happiness there was the issue of race that Heathcliff faced.

  2. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    In 1905, Einstein hypothesized that nothing was faster than the speed of light. This stood as knowledge for many years and is present in textbooks and encyclopedias to this day. Antonio Ereditato, along with his group, named Opera; found that neutrinos could travel faster than the speed of light.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and ...

    Although this shows that disagreement aids the pursuit of knowledge but many of these pursuits will be pointless ones. When a scientist produces a generally acceptable theory, such as ?Cells are the smallest unit of life?, it will be more likely for it to be true than for it to be false.

  2. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    It is implicit that certain variables like altitude, pressure, type of water used etc are to be kept constant to maintain uniformity of scientific procedure. Moreover, I attest personally to the factual accuracy of the aforementioned theory. But, Jason Dulle who has been professionally trained in theology makes an interesting

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work