• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TOK essay topic 5

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"... We will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than from scientific psychology" (Noam Chomsky). To what extent would you agree? "Man does not live by bread alone" Unlike animals, humans are a strange case of self-conscious beings. We can ask questions about ourselves, we can deliberate about others. We form opinions and judgments about others whereas animals are content on feeding themselves and they do not even ask questions about themselves. This is the primary source of the emergence of the human identity. 'Who am I?' is the question that encompasses our identity. But ironically while we call it the 'I' or 'me', we often fail to realize that a large portion of it is in fact constructed by 'others'- their opinions, ideas, and experiences. Human life and human personality are nothing but a gradual development through the accumulation of 'knowledge' through the various Ways of Knowing (Emotion, Perception, Logic & Language). They work collectively through an external medium to form human life and personality. Which of these Ways of Knowing does a novel use? Which Ways of Knowing does scientific psychology use? The answer lies before us! While novels employ all the four ways in great depth, scientific psychology employs mainly logic. ...read more.

Middle

The fact that they are omniscient helps us to understand the different emotions that the characters feel and what causes them. Hence, one can get a true understanding of life and personality through logical deductive reasoning. Apart from learning about human life and behavior, novels, much like scientific psychology also help to explore the various myths and instincts embedded deep in our psyche. The Hero Myth for example, which is seen in many a novel. We humans are beset with brokenness and imperfection and are constantly in search of an 'Ideal Self', the person we all want to be. But society pressures and our own sense of adapting as well as fitting brings us to a realization that the above can only be an 'ideal case' and never a real one. Just like the hero myth, the Mother Myth and the Jealous Romeo myth are also very commonly incorporated in novels. What we read greatly affects our subconscious, to which we then react with what we would term 'instincts'. This also answers the fundamental question in ToK - 'How can we know without knowing that we know?' Art is an Area of Knowledge that is grouped in the category of creativity. But TS Eliot in his essay 'Tradition and the individual talent' states that even art is greatly influenced by the artist's traditions, experiences and moreover what he reads. ...read more.

Conclusion

Paradoxically, psychologists have a big problem with people. When someone learns psychology they begin to think a lot about people and start forming judgments about them. This in turn changes their behavior towards them which changes everything. On the other hand, novels tell us there are billions of shades in human beings and there is not one definite thing. This would have to be agreed upon as the human being is too complex to be compartmentalized in terms of behavior. However complex, scientific psychology is something that is developed over a period of time with full logic and understanding of the human mind. But who came up with this theory through scientific psychology? How and on what basis? How reliable is the source? On the other hand, novels are nothing but perceptions of authors. Novels consist of real time human emotions, experience, thinking, reflecting, opinions, ideas and much more. Knowers would still strongly believe that much of our personality and knowledge about human life is derived from psychology using scientific methods. But little do we realize that it is the things we read everyday that help in moulding our perception of human life. Though psychology is a more reliable source of knowledge which employs logical and technical means to examine human behavior, it is not accessible to the ordinary man. Besides its limitation of language restricts its ability to communicate as novels do. Word Count: 1,322 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Free essay

    IB TOK essay

    Scientific knowledge is also irrelevant when considering ethical problems. My TOK presentation described how PGD10 science now allows us to screen embryos for genetic conditions before selection and implantation into the womb.11 Subsequent class discussion raised several moral dilemmas, such as: "Is it acceptable to kill embryos that have the potential to yield life?

  2. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    It started to change into a bluish colour which seemed like a flame. I was very taken back by this as it gave me a completely different reaction as I first had seen the art from far. b) If you did not, does that make the work of art less great?

  1. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Charis : So, for example, when someone is happy, they smile and we as the knower knows that they are happy and we also know that they are sad or angry when they frown. Therefore, what people do and how people act is what is summed up as personality, no?

  2. Context is all. from the novel The Handmaids Tale by Margaret Atwood brings a ...

    Actually, I believe that there have been far more beautiful paintings created during the Renaissance, but when I analyzed the painting in the context of an art historian; I realized the vast difference between a painting which is simply nice to look at to a painting which imparts so much valuable information and demands constant research.

  1. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Both these factors can and are portrayed in novels and scientific psychology. For that reason, novels and psychology can be considered mediums of knowledge of personality. Nevertheless, the observational method that both use is flawed, as it is impossible to perceive everything, and therefore portray things clearly.

  2. Tok Essay - Question 5 2010

    However, following the important insight provided by Thomas Kuhn in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, science in practice would appear to be not as provisional as Shermer would seem to suggest. II. Shermer as a Popperian falsificationist? Karl Popper, one of the greatest philosophers of science of the

  1. Coherence Essay

    Of course there must have been some miscommunication when Eusane Bolt and Michael Phelps were born. Moral questions do not seem to be so concrete that they can be answered in labs by measuring the distance between point A and point B, however no one can argue that something such

  2. Science and an accumulation of facts -TOK essay

    All three structures would break down if there weren?t scientific facts/axioms/cement to hold the structure; this is because no structure is formed by simply stacking bricks on top of each other. Since axioms are self proven facts, they don?t have any particular ?proof? of being true.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work