• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ToK Essay Plan What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations? Introduction Define "Science": According to Dictionary.com, the definition of the word "science" is: "1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws: the mathematical sciences. 2. Systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation." Define "History": According to Dictionary.com, the definition of the word "history" is: "1. the branch of knowledge dealing with past events. 2. a continuous, systematic narrative of past events as relating to a particular people, country, period, person, etc., usually written as a chronological account; chronicle: a history of France; a medical history of the patient." Define "Explanation": According to Dictionary.com, the definition of the word "explanation" is: "1. A statement made to clarify something and make it understandable. 2. A meaning or interpretation." Link the definitions and write about each knowledge areas' objectives (science, to understand and explain the world around us) Mid-section 1 Present to the reader an example of a scientific and historical explanation. A scientific explanation must be exact e.g.: Force = Mass x Speed. There is no possible way to change the formula and have it still be true. No other combination of variables can be used to calculate force. Similar to math, scientific explanations rely on the use of quantitative data. ...read more.

Middle

Historians are constantly using secondary data and carrying out desk research if they didn't witness the event they are studying. Scientist can always use primary data when they carry out experiments. Both knowledge areas rely on perception, but perception is used in different ways. A historical event only genuinely happens once and this specific event cannot be replicated in the precise circumstances as the original occurrence. Scientists usually base their experiments on ones done in the past, but they can be simulated in the same way. Furthermore, historians will only ever obtain actual knowledge from a past piece of data if it is recovered. The veracity of such data cannot always be confirmed whereas scientists aim to find the veracity of facts and find ways to prove it. Historical and scientific explanations have several similarities. It is of my belief that the main connection between them is the way in which they are conceived. In both knowledge areas, the explanations are composed by recording events what happens, yet to affirm that "to come up with either a historical or scientific explanation, you must record what happens" makes things seem much simpler than they really are. Let's use history as an example. There isn't always a reliable source to eyewitness important historic proceedings. We must consider that the accountancy of a happening cannot be made if there wasn't anyone to witness it. To account for a happening and not be sure of its veracity, you must have different pieces of evidence and opinions which support its authenticity. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, historians will only ever obtain actual knowledge from a past piece of data if it is recovered. The veracity of such data cannot always be confirmed whereas scientists deal with evidence and data that is right before their eyes by use of experimentations. (e.g.: Turin shroud) Science and History do cross paths more frequently than thought though. Both resort to giving different points of view when lacking evidence. Science does this to explain the Big Bang theory for example. Nobody was actually there to see what happened and if it was true or not, but scientifically speaking, it was the most plausible thing that could have happened, therefore the scientific knowledge previously acquired was used to back up this theory. I think the key difference between history and science is that a scientific experiment can be recreated whereas history can only be experienced once. When writing a lab report for science, it is important to show the procedure clearly so that other people can base their experiments on yours, and recreate the same results- this sets science apart from time. History is confined to the past. It can never be recreated and it can only be experienced once. I believe that the boundary separating science from history is that instead of relying on what others experienced in the past and told us about is less precise and less impacting than a discovery that can be tested and reconstructed in the present. 1 Dictionary.com 2 Dictionary.com 3 Dictionary.com 4 phstok.blogspot.com 5 Wikipedia - Ben Johnson ?? ?? ?? ?? Charles Echols Spragins III Class 11H ToK Mr. Casey 2010 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK essay

    irrationality.4 Stereotypes, by definition always false, continue to exist because strongly emotional persons only notice the lazy immigrants and oversee the hard-working ones. The negative effect that the use of emotions can have on knowledge and the control of it is made clear in Orwell's 1984.5 On the other hand,

  2. Free essay

    IB TOK essay

    As Arthur Koestler aptly commented: "The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life".3 Just as Albert Einstein proved with his theory of relativity that Isaac Newton's laws were incomplete, so in future Einstein's

  1. What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    Any observation made for a scientific explanation will concentrate on explaining present natural concepts that occur around us. In contrast, historical explanations and observation with their focus on the past do not seem to have an immediate practical value. It is justifiable that historical explanations give us a sense of

  2. Truman Show (TOK)

    we can be manipulated by something in our life because we believe everything acquire from the world we are living through our senses builds our identity to define truth. For example, his father is drowned in the sea when he is young in a thunderstorm but in fact his father

  1. TOK History Essay

    concepts can be misinterpreted or even ignored when analyzing old literature or historical events because of the change of language. In mathematics, language is the representation of the symbols that can only take one form. For example, an addition symbol can only mean to add because there are no other

  2. TOK essay

    On the other hand, not everyone can come up with their own way on knowing, the majority of people decide to believe in what is shown in textbooks and what has been proven correct. Unlike Einstein's way of discovering solutions, by taking other peoples theories and building on them to

  1. Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between ...

    Many revolutionary thinkers came out with ideas about evolution such as George-Louis Leclerc ( 1707 ? 1788), Erasmus Darwin ( 1731 ? 1802), Jean Batiste Lamarck ( 1744 ? 1829), Robert Chambers ( 1802 ? 1871) but their theories was published without evidences and in a time that people did

  2. Defining and Analyzing Mixed Method Johnson and Christensen (2007) describe mixed research as the ...

    Methodology The researcher will describe the methodology used to determine if there is a relationship between servant leadership and workplace-related outcome at Shorter University. The study will discuss the population, sample size, instrument, survey administration, variables, data collection procedures, and the data analysis procedures.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work