• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Truth.People think that truth is relative because they could look at others points of view, but there are no different interpretations to truth.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Truth. Truth is absolute. If it was not, why did the whole world call it TRUTH? Truth is conformity with fact or reality (oxford dictionary. p. 678). Sometimes truth is not found nor interpreted the right way, and this is when people think it is relative, but it is not. Truth can be twisted and changed by everyone, and this is why the world today encounters wars, hatred, confusion, distrust, discrimination, anger, starvation, jealousy and most of all diversification. Are all of the people aware of what is the truth to everything? The key here is that it is not the same throughout the entire world. Sources are not reliable anymore and this is why the truth is hidden and may never be found until judgment day. Thus, it is absolute, no matter what people say or believe, there is only one truth. From the beginning of humanity, there were conflicts because of a disagreement between two sides. ...read more.

Middle

This statement is a hundred percent correct or else it would not have been a law that the whole world recognize and abide by its rules. Therefore, in sciences, truth is absolute. An example of a big war today that is strongly related to truth is the Middle East crisis or more accurately the unending conflict between Palestine and Israel. This war began fifty years ago when Jews after the Second World War were given a settlement by the British government on this particular land. Palestinians and Israelis could not communicate together and thus a war began destroying lands and killing innocent and poor civilians. For the Arabs, truth is that Jews from Europe and few from other nations came in by force with the help of the British government and took the land by force committing atrocities against Arabic children, men and women. On the other hand, for Europeans and Americans, truth is that Jews were given money by the British government and The U.S.A to buy lands so they can settle in peace after the 'Holocaust'. ...read more.

Conclusion

glory and attraction, a time of science and technology, a time of love and care ness, a time of peace and wars, a time that marked the beginning of a new generation and a style of life. Nevertheless truth was one thing that did not change, may be distorted but its originality will never be changed at all, and this is why truth is absolute and not relative. People interpret things differently including facts; they also change truth and make up their own to prove their point no matter what happens. Truth can best be described as a result of solving a problem in Mathematics, or being a law in Physics or Biology because if it is true, nobody can change it nor contradict it. Today the world is in sorrow and grief because truth is hidden. As the Middle East crisis continues, truth becomes buried more and more until it would never be found. This does not mean that it is relative, because there is only one truth no matter what happens. Therefore, truth is absolute. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    Of course I perceived the call incorrect because after the game I watched the tape and the ref had made the correct call.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    to be killed by a murderer. Therefore, one would assume that it would be more ethical to defend against such an attack. One should realize that emotion takes a large part here because if one doesn't feel the emotions at the moment, and were thinking with more reason, then it would be impossible to use one's ethics subjectively.

  1. What is the Duty of War Correspondents? Many war correspondents are criticized by the ...

    The conflict on what the news media is allowed to televise arises because the people's right to know conflicts with the national security of the country.

  2. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    is somewhat true, but not precise enough, whereas natural sciences have one correct answer and no other. In general, I am trying to prove that emotions can be explained in so many ways, that it is hard to get one exact answer.

  1. Are some ways of knowing more likely to lead to truth than others?

    through the use of deductive reasoning, scientists were able to take the facts they gathered to form a correct scientific truth. Therefore, using reasoning as a way of leading to scientific truth is much more accurate than perception or even language and emotion.

  2. Tok vocabularies - defining terms like "Truth" and "Belief"

    she had a delivery and that there is a problem with it. So he told her she should send money to the post office. She thought it was real, but later she realized that she was being deceived. For a moment she thought it was real just because he had authority.

  1. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    Sense perception is an element of human experience. Consider an example in which a person does not know whether something like a burning flame can be dangerous or not. Slowly establishing tactile contact with the flame is a very practical way of knowing if direct contact with the flame is hazardous.

  2. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    During the initial phases of ?operation Iraqi liberation?, President George W. Bush and UK prime minister Tony Blair claimed they had evidence that Saddam Hussein was building 60 ?Weapons of Mass Destruction? in his country - claims which turned out to be totally unfounded.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work