• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using history and at least one other area of knowledge, examine the claim that it is possible to attain knowledge despite problems of bias and selection.

Extracts from this document...


Using history and at least one other area of knowledge, examine the claim that it is possible to attain knowledge despite problems of bias and selection. The study of whether a source can be trusted in light of its origin, reliability and subjective nature is one that is consistently employed by historians and writers who intend to create as an objective an account of events as possible. In this essay I intend to discuss the negative impact that bias can cause but also how it can be limited or used to the historians' advantage when analysing a certain period in history. I will also explore the effect that bias and selection has on the natural sciences which can be linked to historical circumstances in a bid to argue that knowledge can be obtained despite these problems. As my primary point, I would like to stress that bias and selection in themselves do not necessarily impede our knowledge of this period. Just because someone is more favourable to one figure or set of events at the expense of another does not make our source worthless. ...read more.


The most evident example of this would be the use of propaganda. Propaganda has been a medium by which governments and rulers have shaped the perception and emotive response of their population. Information which reflects negatively on them will be omitted whilst those more favourable will be included in order that they would be perceived as good. This therefore does not provide information on the state of affairs (typically economic information is omitted, for example in communist Russia) but does help us analyse the power and style of leadership of the time. However, thus far I have discussed the idea that even biased sources can be scrutinised and examined in order to provide information concerning the motives and reliability of the source. But the situation is complicated when biased sources our used to provide information which may not wholly be accurate. I find this especially the case in my medieval class when there are very few sources provided on an event and those which do are from a subjective background. ...read more.


Archaeology plays a key part in our analysis, by excavating various areas we can determine whether Thucydides was likely to be correct or whether the geophysical results contradict the literature. Historians are generally interested with the entire contexts of events, rather than small individual occurrences. It is very difficult to manipulate history through invention of events without being detected, as other sources and archaeology tend to give away these fallacies. Therefore, with the example of pro-Athenian Thucydides, although he may have glorified Athens' participation in the war, he would not be able to ignore the undeniable truth that Athens lost this war. Most commonly when attempting to obtain knowledge and information, a historian will use a wide range of information in order to reach an objective opinion. By using a wide range of sources, some which disagree with others, historians are improving the accuracy of their findings. Factors such as reliability, background of the writer and his knowledge of the full events are all important in coming to a conclusion and by carefully analysing these sources I think it arguable that historians can come to a legitimate conclusion. Of course this process requires the use of selection, however ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK History Essay

    concepts can be misinterpreted or even ignored when analyzing old literature or historical events because of the change of language. In mathematics, language is the representation of the symbols that can only take one form. For example, an addition symbol can only mean to add because there are no other

  2. Are scientific models useful, despite their inaccuracies?

    The purpose of the periodic table (to show an element's weight, structure, etc, relative to other elements) was changed due to inaccuracies (missing elements). If we assess Bohr's model, the space between the electrons and the nucleus is evidently mistaken.

  1. TOK Essay: Using history and at least one other area of knowledge, examine the ...

    Thus, it is impossible for knowledge to be without the slightest stain of bias and selection, and in some areas, this trait is more directly projected than others. One of such areas is History.

  2. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    Using general words is basically creating labels. Creating labels is efficient for the purpose of saving time. However, mislabeling may create problems. There are many different ways of classifying things. Labels can be natural (objective) or cultural. Labels of people can easily slip into stereotypes - that is making assumptions

  1. The knowledge that we value the most is the knowledge for which we can ...

    Most of the world would strongly argue against that. This brings back the subjectivity in the word "value". Different people can have different knowledge they consider valuable, and religious knowledge is certainly one of them. While religion may not be able to provide strong justifications that define how nature works the way science does, religion does provide humans with morals and ideals that are valuable.

  2. TOK. Consider the extent to which complete certainty might be achievable in mathematics and ...

    to act differently towards the observer and might result into false observations. Thirdly, scientists may decide some of their observations based on what they want to see, which is of course biased. So if all these factors affect the certainty of an observation, how can you be certain of the subject and its observations which are assumed to be true?

  1. Examine the Claim That It Is Possible to Attain Knowledge Despite Problems of Bias ...

    It gives overview of past events and its purpose is to give the summarization of significant events and people in the history of China. However, who decides which events are more important in the past and which events should bare more detail and take up more page space in the book?

  2. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Discuss.

    Imagination is the faculty or action of forming new ideas, images or concepts of external objects not present to the senses ? it literally means that when you imagine you are thinking of something new. Imagination is a production of our memory and enables us to analyze our past and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work