• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using history and at least one other area of knowledge, examine the claim that it is possible to attain knowledge despite problems of bias and selection.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using history and at least one other area of knowledge, examine the claim that it is possible to attain knowledge despite problems of bias and selection. The study of whether a source can be trusted in light of its origin, reliability and subjective nature is one that is consistently employed by historians and writers who intend to create as an objective an account of events as possible. In this essay I intend to discuss the negative impact that bias can cause but also how it can be limited or used to the historians' advantage when analysing a certain period in history. I will also explore the effect that bias and selection has on the natural sciences which can be linked to historical circumstances in a bid to argue that knowledge can be obtained despite these problems. As my primary point, I would like to stress that bias and selection in themselves do not necessarily impede our knowledge of this period. Just because someone is more favourable to one figure or set of events at the expense of another does not make our source worthless. ...read more.

Middle

The most evident example of this would be the use of propaganda. Propaganda has been a medium by which governments and rulers have shaped the perception and emotive response of their population. Information which reflects negatively on them will be omitted whilst those more favourable will be included in order that they would be perceived as good. This therefore does not provide information on the state of affairs (typically economic information is omitted, for example in communist Russia) but does help us analyse the power and style of leadership of the time. However, thus far I have discussed the idea that even biased sources can be scrutinised and examined in order to provide information concerning the motives and reliability of the source. But the situation is complicated when biased sources our used to provide information which may not wholly be accurate. I find this especially the case in my medieval class when there are very few sources provided on an event and those which do are from a subjective background. ...read more.

Conclusion

Archaeology plays a key part in our analysis, by excavating various areas we can determine whether Thucydides was likely to be correct or whether the geophysical results contradict the literature. Historians are generally interested with the entire contexts of events, rather than small individual occurrences. It is very difficult to manipulate history through invention of events without being detected, as other sources and archaeology tend to give away these fallacies. Therefore, with the example of pro-Athenian Thucydides, although he may have glorified Athens' participation in the war, he would not be able to ignore the undeniable truth that Athens lost this war. Most commonly when attempting to obtain knowledge and information, a historian will use a wide range of information in order to reach an objective opinion. By using a wide range of sources, some which disagree with others, historians are improving the accuracy of their findings. Factors such as reliability, background of the writer and his knowledge of the full events are all important in coming to a conclusion and by carefully analysing these sources I think it arguable that historians can come to a legitimate conclusion. Of course this process requires the use of selection, however ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK History Essay

    The feelings that people in the past experienced can determine why certain historical events happened while problem-solvers are only interested in the way to solve the problem rather than the feelings of the mathematicians in mathematics. In terms of language, I believe it is more important in history because some

  2. TOK Essay: Using history and at least one other area of knowledge, examine the ...

    Thus, it is impossible for knowledge to be without the slightest stain of bias and selection, and in some areas, this trait is more directly projected than others. One of such areas is History.

  1. Doubt is the Key to Knowledge

    A philosopher like Sir Karl Popper would not group these Areas of Knowledge together. He believed that critical rationalism was required to reach knowledge rather than emotion.2 So, he would agree that the Sciences require a fair amount of doubt, but he would likely argue that the Arts do not follow this same path.

  2. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    Eye-witness testimony - single eye-witnesses are unreliable since they tend to commit perceptual errors and the element of time plays a major role as well. Distinguishing appearance from reality Perception causes problems since: We may misinterpret what we see We may fail to notice something We may misremember what we

  1. Analyse the strengths and weaknesses of using faith as a basis for knowledge in ...

    The concept of a theorem is therefore fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical. For example, the proof for Euclid's Second Theorem, which states that the number of primes is infinite, the postulate is that there are integers which are prime that is,

  2. Defining and Analysing Violence

    There is no information whether the plotters intend to activate it, leave it, or perhaps deactivate it. Therefore, I don't regard "plotting" as violence. However, the latter "threatens" the residents around the area. The action not only causes huge panic but is also potentially dangerous.

  1. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Discuss.

    Imagination is the faculty or action of forming new ideas, images or concepts of external objects not present to the senses ? it literally means that when you imagine you are thinking of something new. Imagination is a production of our memory and enables us to analyze our past and

  2. History is always on the move, slowly eroding todays orthodoxy and making space for ...

    One might argue that chemistry is not always on the move, because it takes place when a researcher finds an anomaly and he is aware of it. Only then he will search for a possible explanation. If this anomaly can not be explained by the current paradigm, he has to come up with a new theory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work