• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula or a more sophisticated version of it actually determine what we believe to be true?

Extracts from this document...


"What I tell you three times is true." (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula - or a more sophisticated version of it - actually determine what we believe to be true? The moment one reads Lewis's quote, they may immediately reject it to the point that it is considered bizarre. They may argue that no matter how many times someone says something about a particular subject, it will not change the 'real' truth and that repetition is not adequate to change ones belief or perception of the 'truth'. The reality of the matter is that a statement must not necessarily have to be true for a person to believe that it is true, rather a statement can be entirely untrue, and yet people can believe in the statement to be true. However in some cases it common to find that what people perceive to be true is simply as a result of them hearing the same thing over and over again. If people were asked whether Muslims eat pork, it may be that the person knows this simply because they have heard it numerous number of times. This brings light to the fact that mere repetition could be a significant way of knowing. ...read more.


In the natural sciences, the 'truth' can be deduced through experimentation and consequently deduction as opposed to simply inducing 'true' knowledge from repetitive secondary information. Deductive reasoning is whereby a 'true' conclusion is drawn as a result of previously given information being true. In physics, students have the opportunity to experiment and arrive at conclusions to determine certain laws and concepts. During these experiments, we usually attempt to acquire the most accurate results by repeating the same experiments through several trails by altering the independent variables. Through this repetition, we obtain the most accurate proof that is required to approve or disprove various theories, laws and concepts. At the same time, the repetition of similar conclusion often formulates what we believe to be true in the natural sciences. In the first trimester of my diploma program, in physics class, one of my projects was to explain Newton's First Law of Motion, which states "The velocity of a body remains constant unless the body is acted upon by an external force". I was required to test this law by experimentation and present my findings to the whole class. In doing so, I was able to confirm Newton's First Law of Motion using a marble and various surfaces of wooden planks. ...read more.


that the war increased tensions in Europe, while the other three sources stated that the increased tensions were as a result of the rise of new ideologies, namely Fascism and Bolshevism. Thus repeated statements were counter productive as one set of repetitions stated one side while another set supported an alternate side. Thus Carroll's statement lacks consistency in its reference to repetition because there is no given solution to when one comes across two contradicting repetitions. We can therefore conclude that Carroll's statement can be applied in history as far as the basic facts are concerned but cannot venture beyond that and delve deeper into history. In conclusion, Lewis's statement has shown occurrences in the natural sciences through repetition resulting from deductive and inductive reasoning that could potentially determine what we believe to be true. However, emotional attachment to specific hypothesis often cause confirmation bias leading to flawed 'truths'. Furthermore, despite our reliance on induced conclusions from repetitive results, induction is a logic that cannot achieve absolute truth. Additionally, in history, while repetition could be an effective method to arrive at induced conclusions of what we believe to be true, the repetition of contradictory views due to emotional bias leads to a lack of complexity and sophistication to determine what we believe to be true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. If facts themselves never prove or disprove anything, what else is involved in the ...

    What is important is that no further justification (evidence, artifacts, documents, etc.) are needed, nor do we have to believe the claim, we only have to accept the fact, plus the logical argument. From the Natural Sciences, Michelson and Morley's experiment (Fowler, 2006)

  2. ToK presentation

    Since then the glaciers and ice sheets have been retreating and there are few glaciers left, e.g. the Columbian ice field and the glaciers in the Alps. The earth has been through numerous ice ages and dramatic climate changes

  1. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    I believe not, but it does mean that we should never just accept things as fact by rather use many different sources and resources to come up with our own beliefs about what happened. History is very important as is being open-minded and trying not to form preconceived opinions without McMullin 4 all of the facts.

  2. A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    This would mean that either there wouldn't be vast knowledge on previous events or everybody would think the same over a certain event, which is not good for the prosperity of history. If many people would believe that Nazi Germany was the best thing that ever happened, nobody would go into why it was the worst thing.

  1. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    view an objects identically- ideas change in a social, artistic and cultural setting. Basic human principles like morality as well rely on this relativity in the world. This can be substantiated by the quote 'since there is no God to will what is good.

  2. What might be meant by Nietzche's comment that "rational thought is interpretation according to ...

    triangle, and then square root the result, you could work out the length of the hypotenuse of it. The problem was that, when you have a triangle which sides values are 1 (meters, centimetres, it does not matter) the length of the hypotenuse then should be ?2, which is an infinite number.

  1. People Need To Believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events

    Natural scientists seek to find answers and explain questions regarding biology, physics and chemistry.1 This urge to find the answers and finding further knowledge in the sciences implies, not in a too vague way, that not knowing and understanding would make us uncomfortable and unrest which would in this case represent chaos in us.

  2. "What I tell you three times is true." (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula - ...

    this is actually impossible, but devout Christians reject the Darwinian theory of evolution, as they have repeatedly heard in the bible, that the world was created in 7 days. This shows that truth can actually gain validity through repetition; a priest preaching the stories of the bible is telling the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work