• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula or a more sophisticated version of it actually determine what we believe to be true?

Extracts from this document...


"What I tell you three times is true." (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula - or a more sophisticated version of it - actually determine what we believe to be true? The moment one reads Lewis's quote, they may immediately reject it to the point that it is considered bizarre. They may argue that no matter how many times someone says something about a particular subject, it will not change the 'real' truth and that repetition is not adequate to change ones belief or perception of the 'truth'. The reality of the matter is that a statement must not necessarily have to be true for a person to believe that it is true, rather a statement can be entirely untrue, and yet people can believe in the statement to be true. However in some cases it common to find that what people perceive to be true is simply as a result of them hearing the same thing over and over again. If people were asked whether Muslims eat pork, it may be that the person knows this simply because they have heard it numerous number of times. This brings light to the fact that mere repetition could be a significant way of knowing. ...read more.


In the natural sciences, the 'truth' can be deduced through experimentation and consequently deduction as opposed to simply inducing 'true' knowledge from repetitive secondary information. Deductive reasoning is whereby a 'true' conclusion is drawn as a result of previously given information being true. In physics, students have the opportunity to experiment and arrive at conclusions to determine certain laws and concepts. During these experiments, we usually attempt to acquire the most accurate results by repeating the same experiments through several trails by altering the independent variables. Through this repetition, we obtain the most accurate proof that is required to approve or disprove various theories, laws and concepts. At the same time, the repetition of similar conclusion often formulates what we believe to be true in the natural sciences. In the first trimester of my diploma program, in physics class, one of my projects was to explain Newton's First Law of Motion, which states "The velocity of a body remains constant unless the body is acted upon by an external force". I was required to test this law by experimentation and present my findings to the whole class. In doing so, I was able to confirm Newton's First Law of Motion using a marble and various surfaces of wooden planks. ...read more.


that the war increased tensions in Europe, while the other three sources stated that the increased tensions were as a result of the rise of new ideologies, namely Fascism and Bolshevism. Thus repeated statements were counter productive as one set of repetitions stated one side while another set supported an alternate side. Thus Carroll's statement lacks consistency in its reference to repetition because there is no given solution to when one comes across two contradicting repetitions. We can therefore conclude that Carroll's statement can be applied in history as far as the basic facts are concerned but cannot venture beyond that and delve deeper into history. In conclusion, Lewis's statement has shown occurrences in the natural sciences through repetition resulting from deductive and inductive reasoning that could potentially determine what we believe to be true. However, emotional attachment to specific hypothesis often cause confirmation bias leading to flawed 'truths'. Furthermore, despite our reliance on induced conclusions from repetitive results, induction is a logic that cannot achieve absolute truth. Additionally, in history, while repetition could be an effective method to arrive at induced conclusions of what we believe to be true, the repetition of contradictory views due to emotional bias leads to a lack of complexity and sophistication to determine what we believe to be true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    This would mean that multiple perspectives would not occur. Without multiple perspectives, there is a loss of analysis and understanding of history. This results in a loss of enrichment, seen as though there would be a more restricted way of looking at things.

  2. Tell me how youre conducting your search and Ill tell you what youre looking ...

    are not perfect and that the axioms that we invented could actually be not truthful, which would result in the 'garbage-in, garbage-out' scenario where because of the original axiom being false, all theorems based on this will also be false.

  1. ToK presentation

    The best we can really do is to scan all the pieces of information, and compare them to each other to collect the common facts. This is why it is very hard to sieve through the false predictions on global warming to find the true answer.

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    I believe not, but it does mean that we should never just accept things as fact by rather use many different sources and resources to come up with our own beliefs about what happened. History is very important as is being open-minded and trying not to form preconceived opinions without McMullin 4 all of the facts.

  1. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    If we take the careful observational approach of Aristotle, the slow but endless changing nature of all objects in and around earth could be observed, but to what end? How would Aristotle ever have observed the movement of the stars and galaxy?s away from each other without the benefit of

  2. Defining and Analyzing Mixed Method Johnson and Christensen (2007) describe mixed research as the ...

    To aid in the efforts of effective leadership, researchers may need to alter the methodology used for leadership studies organizational requirements in the 21st century will differ from requirements faced by businesses today. Consequently, research methods used to study the realm of leadership has been based upon the paradigm of how aspects should be managed.

  1. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. Discuss

    This AOK may have the most truth or the most false since we have assumptions in natural sciences. In physics there is an assumption that the amount energy given out is equal to the amount of energy taken. This assumption is actually true in everything we know that is why we still believe this theory.

  2. This essay will attempt to determine whether a point or argument made to an ...

    made, should this not mean that McDonald?s would have gone out of business by now or been shut down by the US Food and Drug Administration? Let us not forget that McDonald?s felt compelled to change its product offering after the release and bad press from Supersize Me Now that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work