• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing?

Extracts from this document...


What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing? Many people don't want to be convinced, no matter how good the evidence and data is. They much prefer to turn away especially if it contradicts a cherished belief and particularly a religious faith. But, many others will be convinced of a theory especially when it is supported with hard evidence from observation, mathematical and scientific processes. Of course, even the good theories are open to being replaced by other related but better theories as observation and evidence accumulate over time, for instance Newton's by Einstein's, so there should always remain an element of doubt as to whether a theory is a complete description, and that all the evidence has been gathered. Usually people won't believe the words of everyone, people commonly belief these theories because a "smart" person such a scientist will state it, and the simple reason of being a scientist gives you much more credibility. Sometimes it's the evidence from which they're derived and by which they are supported or refuted, what makes theories in natural and human sciences so convincing. ...read more.


More recent evidence from genetics has strengthened Darwin's theory, and few would doubt the theory is very strong, unless a religious belief gets in the way. Theories in human and natural sciences used to follow this methodology to finally convert the theory in a fact and convince people about it. But actually, people exploit the media to make consumers buy a specific product such as a shower gel for example, when they use scientific language and statements such as "Scientifically proven" "9 out of 10 people think this product is the best" that are not proven to persuade consumers. Nothing, no matter how scientifically proven, is ever a hundred per cent true. Even the laws of science may be disproved if new facts or evidence contradicts them. Einstein's theory may be disproved at any moment by anyone. This is what gives entrance to doubt which is key to prove theories. The natural science includes subjects such as physics, chemistry and biology which they focus into a different aspect of nature. But I believe that, proving a scientific hypothesis does not require doubt. It requires methodology. ...read more.


If you do not want to believe in God then why would you believe in the creation of science? Anything that says "No God did it" would be appealing to them and would be more convincing. Can you test evolution? Can you test creation? Neither can be done so whichever one you believe is the one you will defend. So, what makes human and natural science theories so convincing? Commonly are, proof, research and evidence the keys to convince people. A theory is only as good as the evidence that supports it. If you want to know how convincing a particular aspect is then have a look in to the research history and see how it is backed up. But it can also depend on the believes of each person as mentioned before, if someone really beliefs on a theory, even if there is no proof, testing or science method supporting the theory they will still strongly belief the theory. For example, if a Spanish person really loves his country and someone states on TV that Francisco Franco was a good dictator and improved the Spanish economy discarding the thousands of people he killed, a lot of Spanish people will agree even without knowing the Franco`s history. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. If facts themselves never prove or disprove anything, what else is involved in the ...

    Do you now have any knowledge? Do you believe it to be true? Do you have evidence that supports the claim? Is it a fact, i.e. is it actually true? Well, it is true, but you still have only my word for it (hopefully that is enough), but as an

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    Hence, the theory becomes convincing. Furthermore, if fellow researchers are able to successfully reproduce the same results when replicating an experiment, theories become further confirmed, as the original hypotheses will be reexamined if different results are obtained. This may lead to new hypotheses and further experimentation.

  1. TOK Essay on Natural Sciences

    to say "hi" to an older Korean and would have to say "hello" unless they know that the older Korean would not mind. This is established as morally correct to be respectful to any older Korean as it is known as a respect and a belief that must be followed.

  2. Capital Punishment and why it should be abolished, with particular regard to the Human ...

    high security prisons that always employ all round security to ensure no one breaks out and are designed in such a way that they can't be escaped from, or once escaped cant go and harm people. Those areas include such ones as Guantamo Bay which itself is an island.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and ...

    Everyone considers his or her language superior. I am no authority against the Nobel laureate but given my experience, observation and reason I think, ?By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth.? Nor do I agree with the words of the business magnate and the founder of the British department store Selfridges, ?that the

  2. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    This allows there to be two opposing theories, as results of a particular occurrence vary based on numerous reasons. For example, the result of an earthquake of the same magnitude has a very different effect on the economy in Japan than that in Haiti.

  1. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    Is how we behave under pressure really a part of who we are at the core? On the other hand, there are those who would claim that one is what one behaves i.e. one?s actions are what gives on a sense of who one is.

  2. Human sciences - the language of questionnaires

    Verb mean of speed estimated (mph) Smashed 40.8 Collided 39.3 Bumped 38.1 Hit 34.0 Contacted 31.8 A similar procedure was used in which 150 students were chosen to participate. They saw a one-minute film which contained a scene in which several cars were involved in an accident.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work