• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When can we trust our senses to give us truth?

Extracts from this document...


Kim Baardsen Monday, November 19, 2007 IB 1: Theory of Knowledge When Can We Trust Our Senses to Give Us The Truth? When can we trust our senses to give us the truth? This is a complicated question that requires us to think about how much of what we perceive is reality and how much is created by our minds and beliefs. For us to do this we must do as Bertrand Russell says in his book, "Problems of Philosophy": "the painter has to unlearn the habit of thinking that things seem to have a colour which common sense says they 'really' have and to learn the habit of seeing things as they appear." (Russell, Bertrand) This quote refers only to sight, but it is good to recognize that we must do the same for all our senses: we must learn to make a distinction between 'appearance' and 'reality'. This requires us to look past our prejudices and beliefs and perceive what is really there. The four ways of knowing (logic, perception, emotion and language) all play an important part in this, as our prejudices and beliefs are formed when as we take in information and our minds do their best to organize it so that it is understandable. ...read more.


At the time of a certain experiment, everything could be perfect to make a theory true, and it is disproved not long after by someone else. This could be because the scientist interpreted the information wrong, their equipment was not accurate or they were not aware of the small but important factors that affected their experiment in different ways. At the time of the experiment, the results were pragmatic and cohered with their previous knowledge. The information could even correspond with other people's information, but when there is more justification it is easier to believe that it is true. This gives us an important human trait: justification and evidence are used to prove the validity and reliability of an established "truth" even when it is not necessarily the true. We see it as the truth because we can not see what is wrong with it and there is nothing that contradicts it at the time. As soon as there is some doubt, humans naturally try in some way to make it irrelevant or take it into account and try to find ways of minimizing that doubt. ...read more.


Math is good at giving us the true and is used all the time, in our heads subconsciously, in banks to manage our money, in power-plants so we do not blow out our electrical equipment and the examples go on forever. Math is used everywhere because mathematical answer is the truth. The flaw of math is that it gives us a very simple truth. As soon as you add more variables it just gets more complicated. Math also does not give us useful truths to areas of knowing like psychology, or literature because it is impossible to explain these things using numbers. When trying to see if something is pragmatically true, we must use the same pure logic and reason to limit doubt. Pragmatic testing should be the same for everyone, while correspondence and coherence testing very individual as they test if something is true by checking a claim with something else, be it another person or another sense in the body. There is the problem that one of these sources could not be the truth making the truth not true. In my opinion, we should trust our senses to give us truth when we have eliminated all doubt and there is trusted justification. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. This essay will explore how sense cannot be trusted to give us the whole ...

    However, once the stick is taken out of the water, it is straight again. So as humans we question which one is the 'true' shape of the stick, is it bent or straight, and if what we are seeing is the truth?

  2. Tok History. My thesis is that although history and our ethics will always ...

    Its purpose is to absorb the main idea of what happened in the past and how we will adjust or change to such events. In order for this to take place, we must then just accept certain facts, or myths, that we really aren't sure of because we won't ever

  1. How do the 4 WOKS interact to give a picture of a reality?

    Yet one must note that perception is highly subjective. It is affected by culture, religion, family and environment. Thus different people have different perceptions. In fact, my recent visit to an art gallery lead to an argument with my peer about what a painting was conveying.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    With all these uncertainties and biases in approach to truth, I would argue that if we can't test something correspondently, with our five senses, then its validity is very doubtable. A human being's search for truth begins in the external world surrounding him; and the most active process allowing him to be connected to the surrounding world is through perception.

  1. A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    It is important to note that without rigor and interpretation, the world would have one uniform belief. Without rigor and interpretation, it is clear that history could not be neither interpreted by the historians and therefore nor by the future generations of the world.

  2. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    Nevertheless, there are numerous reasons why and how perceptions change from person to person and culture to culture. Our perceptions are highly influenced by factors such as past experience, spatial familiarity and biological limitations. Our past experiences can often condition us to expect things and we often see or hear what we expect to rather than what really happens.

  1. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    It is more a method of keeping track of emotions. To counter that counterclaim however, I would argue that even though the author isn't communicating what he wanted to, to me, I am still getting information from what he has written.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?

    consists of groups of cells, all individual beings which interact to form what appears to be a single organism, and that the surface of the leaf is far from smooth. A chemist knows that each part of each cell, and thus the entire leaf, is in fact a mesh of molecules, atoms and sub-atomic particles, rather than a whole material.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work