• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When mathematicians, historians and scientists say that they have explained something are they using the word explain in the same way?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TOK Essay When mathematicians, historians and scientists say that they have explained something are they using the word explain in the same way? Word count: 1367 In everyday language the term "explain" can mean many things, and is generally applied to prove something or make it more comprehensible. However on a more complex level it could mean many things, depending on the subject it denotes. It is therefore clear that it is very significant in the Theory of Knowledge. However, one must clearly establish the difference between making an idea easier to understand, and actually proving it. As we have seen in our class discussions, the "truths" acquired by different areas of knowledge are naturally different, it is therefore interesting to see what information is used, and what is meant by the word "explain" in different contexts. What could a mathematician imply by the word explain? Maths is a conceptual science which deals with abstract elements that are strategically arranged, so as to form a mathematical explanation or formula. However maths may also be considered as empirical, for children for example, using arithmetical building blocks to understand basic maths. We know maths is true, an independent of subjective experience, which is called priori. The theorem of Pythagoras works, and is positively "true", in Siberia and Tunisia, it was true in 1957 and will be true in 2010, this kind of math is global, and it isn't influenced by context. ...read more.

Middle

Most sciences, including history, explain something with a theory. Newer theories tend to be based on old ones, thus compounding any fault that may have been there to start with, and making the theory less reliable. For example: the Magnetic Field theory gave convenient, basic information on which one could then base many other explanations. So back to history, a historian is actually only giving a probable guess based upon as many clues as he can find, or has the time to delve into. Another question that should be asked is: what is or is not a science? "A science is considered to be the study of nature in relation to humans and the knowledge that we acquire through its study". This therefore would suggest that history is definitely a science, but that mathematics could be debated as not being. Some people argue that there are different types of sciences, such as social, natural and mechanical, (under which mathematics would fall). Mathematics is said to be a perfect science since there is no margin of error, unlike in history. To relate back to the question, when a mathematician says that he has explained something, he means that he has precisely proved a point based on the arrangement of elements and figures that can be reproduced over and over again. ...read more.

Conclusion

So we don't actually study or discover anything in maths, we apply maths to the physical world. Metaphorically speaking math is a jig-saw puzzle of which we have all the pieces, unlike in natural sciences where we are missing an unknown amount of pieces that are yet to be discovered. Biology as such is closely related to history, as it is strongly based on observation, such as through a microscope, animal behaviour in the field...etc This comes under part of an experiment, if a scientist hasn't witnessed what he is explaining, he has related the experiment of another, which may make it harder to believe him, without considering the eventual possibility that it could very well not be true. Therefore one could say that when a scientist says he has explained something he means he has put together a theory, backed up by his own previous knowledge, which he has used to set up experiments in which certain elements, through his own observation, seem to prove what he was setting out to prove in the first place. This kind of approach is very difficult to accept as a true explanation, as it's a self fulfilling process. He has chosen the experiment that will support his theory. So as any good Theory of Knowledge question, opinion plays a large part in the different definitions of the word "explain", depending on what you personally consider it implies, and what it relates to. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    A rationalist argues that knowledge derives principally from reason where an empiricist claims that knowledge originates from our senses. Without the senses we would not be able to receive any kind of knowledge, as we need to be able to see things and hear what people are telling you.

  2. Determinism. Minority Report is very similar to a book called, Chronicle of a ...

    He was able to change the way the event was shown by the pre-cogs because he was able to forgive the man who was just trying to save his family. Now the subject of fate comes into play, like in many movies and stories, fate always finds a way to align things up the way they were meant to be.

  1. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does ...

    Culture is formed in a slow process. For example the Chinese studied the objects and looked for the characteristics, and they carved the objects using these characteristics, and gradually Chinese characters are formed. Therefore, I believe that culture is formed by experiences.

  2. To what extent is the subjective nature of perception regarded as an advantage to ...

    We came to a conclusion that like other forms of art poetry is aesthetic and it can be analyzed in various ways, we might not know the thoughts of the poet or what the poet meant exactly when he or she wrote the poem.

  1. work based project

    However, when I mentioned this to the ward manager she said it would be a problem because there are two patients that were monitored on a one-to-one basis when they were taking part in activities. *Mrs E who exhibited 'promiscuous behaviour' was always trying to show affection to John during dinner times.

  2. Seven Days: A Brief History. During the week of November 7th to November ...

    On November 11th, the country of Greece has been seen on headlines once again as they choose their new prime minister. Lucas Papademos said that he can put the economy back on track and calm all of the political issues that have happened.8 During the same day, Syria has been

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    Both of these responses were derived from who they were. Heathcliff, the orphan boy not born into a wealthy family couldn?t change the way Catherine felt. Jane, who was pretty much an orphan as well couldn?t oppose Rochester?s marriage because she knew she didn?t have a place to do so.

  2. The historians task is to understand the past the human scientist, by contrast, is ...

    Through this, one can use fewer resources to not only protect his/her present environment but to also create a better future for the upcoming generations. Meanwhile, it can be counterclaimed that human scientists don't always intend to change the future.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work