• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐TOK Essay 1 / 2012 2. When should we trust our senses to give us the truth? Name: Ashley Tan (1) Class: P5 Supervisor: Eric Lau Word count: 1585 We interact and understand the world?s various facets through our senses. Our sense of sight, smell, taste, hearing and touch allow us to perceive the surrounding environment as well as to gather information and formulate truths about the world. Our senses are the raw data that we absorb, which our brain processes and interprets, forming our own knowledge and truths. However, will we know whether this truth is really the truth? Our senses can only be trusted sometimes and they do have their own limitations and restrictions. Hence we can never be certain of the truths that we conceive. Thus this essay will address certain situations in which we are able to trust our senses, and situations in which we are not. I believe that truth is something that has been thoroughly tested but not falsified. This means that a truth is only a truth when it has been completely examined by comparing and assessing it to other factors of the environment. However the notion of truth varies in the areas of knowledge. ...read more.

Middle

Deserves the name of knowledge.? Thus he believes that our senses are correct and the data that we receive real, but we can never be certain that that is the truth. Even though our senses may be right, interpretations might differ between people, and each person may formulate different truths of their own. The senses are the the direct link between us and the environment, the immediate organs that acquire the raw data. Even so our brain is the organ that interprets the data that we acquire, assembling the data and enabling us to form truths. Therefore even though every person gains the same information, different people, with different ways of thinking, will come up with varying interpretations and truths of their own. Each individual is influenced by cultural and religious factors. This is often seen in history, as everything happened in the past. Thus even with the hard facts that are gained from things such as eyewitness accounts and personalized documents, the rest is up to the speculation and inference of people in the present day, to try and fill in the gaps that are left behind by history. Consequently, history is extremely liable to bias by those who record the events and happenings. ...read more.

Conclusion

In science, we rely on our senses to make observations about a certain condition or stimulus, or the processes of a reaction. Since our senses are unreliable, we require the use of microscopes as our senses are not perceptive enough to see objects at such a level, and these tools help to make up for the weaknesses of our sensory organs. However, science is constantly being improved on as more advanced technology is being invented, and in the future more scientific breakthroughs will be uncovered. Hence as I have stated previously, we cannot say that there is any definite truth in science as the truth is forever being developed on. In history, people have invented gadgets such as cameras that allow them to take a screenshot of the past. Unlike in our minds where the images that we receive from our eyes are temporary, as we could forget what we have seen, cameras allow us to actually turn memories into something tangible. Therefore instruments and devices are essential when our senses are not entirely reliable. All in all, our senses are the ones that allow us to interact with the world around us. Even so, they are inaccurate most of the time, and may not be permanent. Thus we have to use other ways to gain information from our surroundings, and from there on come up with truths of our own. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    after bringing in other ways of knowledge, emotion and reason, leading to divergent opinions which are both undeniably true to each person. Senses in this case has succeeded in providing subjective truth, truth which is not uniform amongst people but invariable within individuals.

  2. Tok History. My thesis is that although history and our ethics will always ...

    I hope that they're mostly truths because even though they have been disproven as of late, I still choose to have faith in God because I've grown to pray to him and venerate him all my life and he is my inspiration in times of despair.

  1. When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?

    If one notices that all roses that they have perceived, without exception, have green stems with thorns and coloured petals and that when smelled, are pleasant, then one is able to induce that all roses will have these characteristics. Therefore when one sees a plant growing with a green stem

  2. when should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    Once during a chemistry lesson we did an experiment about Filtering where we placed in a beaker sugar and water and heated the beaker. I noticed that the water's level in the beaker was decreasing until it disappeared. I saw and believed that water was disappearing.

  1. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    An example of this is the movie Vantage Point. The plot of this movie is that there was an attempt of assassination on the President of America and is told from several different perspectives.

  2. Difference of Truth and knowldge

    History, like science, mainly depends on theories which are highly affected by the person who creates them and how they develop their ideas. When it comes to facts, such as the date someone died, passionate conviction cannot be used. For example a person could be 100% sure that Winston Churchill

  1. Tok Chap 1-3

    The danger of gullibility * No one is willing to believe everything they read. * We all have limits beyond which we conclude the absurdity of a belief. The danger of scepticism * Being too sceptical means closing your mind to new ideas that challenge conventional wisdom.

  2. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    In the first instance no of course not, and more to the point would you believe him; again of no course not! What we could also conclude is that in their time both great thinkers were on the right wavelength, Aristotle with regards to the ever-changing nature of the universe and everything within it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work